Special report on reimbursement. Medicare program abandons 1986 malpractice rule

Hospitals with claims "properly pending" before fiscal intermediaries or in the courts need do nothing in order to obtain corrected reimbursement for fiscal years so pending. However, to speed processing of corrected reimbursements for fiscal years pending in appeals before the PRRB, hospitals should request that the Board determine its jurisdiction and remand to the fiscal intermediary for payment as soon as possible. It will be helpful to include with any such request a copy of the notice of program reimbursement and the original appeal letter for each fiscal year under appeal. Despite the fact that HCFA Ruling 91-1 effectively concedes that HCFA has applied an invalid regulation to all fiscal years since May 1, 1986, HCFA counsel have stated that HCFA will not permit reopening of closed cost reports to correct the inappropriate apportionment of malpractice insurance costs. Nevertheless, hospitals that do not presently have a claim or appeal pending have several options. Under the Provider Reimbursement Manual, HIM-15, sections 2930-2931, fiscal intermediaries are required to reopen cost reports filed within the three-year reopening period to correct errors. Accordingly, should a fiscal intermediary deny a provider's reopening request, the provider should seriously consider taking an appeal to the PRRB. The PRRB's jurisdiction to review fiscal intermediary denials of requests to reopen cost reports was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, see State of Oregon v. Bowen, 854 F.2d 346 (9th Cir. 1988), a decision that is controlling in California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Arizona, Montana, Idaho, Hawaii, Alaska, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Medicare program; changes to the Medicare+Choice program. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule

The purpose of this final rule is to set forth limited changes to the Medicare+Choice regulations published in our June 26, 1998 interim final rule (63 FR 34968). Those regulations implemented section 4001 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), which established the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program. This final rule addresses selected issues raised by commenters on the June 26, 1998 interim final rule where we have identified the need for changes or where we believe that clarifications are needed as soon as possible. Among these issues are provider participation procedures, beneficiary enrollment options, and several access-related issues, including initial care assessment requirements, notification requirements when specialists are terminated from an M+C plan, and several coordination of care requirements.     

Medicare program; Medicare+Choice program. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period

This final rule with comment period responds to comments on the June 26, 1998 interim final rule that implemented the Medicare+Choice (M+C) program and makes revisions to those regulations where warranted. We also are making revisions to the regulations that are necessary to reflect the changes to the M+C program resulting from the Balanced Budget Refinement Act of 1999 (BBRA). Revisions to the regulations reflecting changes in the law made by the BBRA are subject to public comment. Issues discussed in this rule include eligibility, election, and enrollment policies; marketing requirements; access requirements; service area and benefit policy; quality improvement standards; payment rates, risk adjustment methodology, and encounter data submission; provider participation rules; beneficiary appeals and grievances; contractual requirements; and preemption of State law by Federal law. This final rule also addresses comments on the interim final rule published on December 2, 1997, which implemented user fees for section 1876 risk contractors for 1998, and formed the basis for the M+C user fee provisions in the June 26, 1998 interim final rule, and the provider-sponsored organization (PSO) interim final rule published April 14, 1998.     

Medicare program; suggestion program on methods to improve Medicare efficiency. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule with comment period

This final rule with comment period establishes a program to encourage individuals to submit suggestions that could improve the efficiency of the Medicare program. The rule implements section 203(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. The intent of this rule is to encourage suggestions and to award, if we deem appropriate, monetary payments to individuals for suggestions that improve efficiency and produce monetary savings to the Medicare program.     

Medicare program; solvency standards for provider-sponsored organizations. Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS. Final rule

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established a new Medicare+Choice (M+C) program that offers eligible individuals Medicare benefits through enrollment in one of an array of private health plans that contract with us. Among the new options available to Medicare beneficiaries is enrollment in a provider-sponsored organization (PSO). This final rule revises and responds to comments on solvency standards that certain entities must meet to contract as PSOs under the new M+C program. These standards, originally established in an interim final rule published on May 7, 1998, apply to PSOs that have received a waiver of the requirement that M+C organizations must be licensed by a State as risk-bearing entities.