"共产党要接受监督"与党的执政方式的转变

“共产党要接受监督”是党的八大提出和邓小平特别强调的一个重要思想,是对权力监督理论的一项重大发展,同时也是对共产党执政方式转变提出的根本要求。当前最主要的,是要正确处理党的领导与党要接受监督的关系,“党”与“民”的关系,“不搞群众运动”与群众监督的关系,“党的喉舌”与舆论监督的关系等。     

对依法执政的两点宪政思考

宪政是人类社会政治发展的客观规律,其基本原则在中国已经基本确立。“依法执政、依宪执政”是中国共产党领导人民走向社会主义宪政的重要标志。“依法执政、依宪执政”揭示了中国政治体制改革的宪政之路:坚持和发展宪政制度是政治体制改革的正确方向;党接受人民通过宪法法律实施的监督制约,是实现党的执政方式根本转变和中国走向宪政的关键。     

浅论执政方式内涵

执政或参与执政是政党的战略目标。政党取得执政地位后对执政方式的选择是影响其执政能力乃至执政安全的重要因素。中国共产党执政已近60年，要在21世纪适应执政条件和社会环境所发生的深刻变化，加强党的执政能力建设，提高党的执政水平，维护党的执政安全，必须以与时俱进的精神改革和完善党的执政方式，就有必要对执政方式的内涵进行科学界定。     

论中国共产党依法执政的科学内涵与实践要求

依法执政是改革和完善党的执政方式的必然要求。依法执政,必须服从民主法制的基本原则,按照宪法和法律规定的国家政权组织形式和运行方式执政。实行依法执政,要求党必须把依法执政与加强和改善党的领导结合起来,把依法执政与保证人民当家作主结合起来,把依法执政与实现党的科学高效执政结合起来。     

改进党的执政方式的路径选择

执政方式制约执政能力 ,加强党的执政能力建设 ,必须改进党的执政方式。改进党的执政方式 ,是党的执政方式的自我完善和发展 ,其根本目标是要在中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商制度与人民代表大会制度的架构中 ,探寻科学、民主、合法的执政路径。     

关于我国执政党与民间组织关系的思考

政党与民间组织之间的关系是现代社会关系最重要的组成部分之一。妥善处理执政党与民间组织的关系,对于促进经济发展、维护社会稳定、扩大党的社会基础、提高党的执政能力、建构和谐社会具有非常重要的意义。近些年来,中国民间组织的发展势头强劲,数量和作用不断扩大。在提倡吸收世界文明的优秀成果的今天,我们应当研究和借鉴外国政党和政府处理与这类组织的关系的经验教训,使执政党与民间组织之间形成和谐融洽的关系。     

法国社会党执政经验教训及启示

作为法国左翼第一大党,法国社会党在当今法国政治生活中拥有毋庸置疑的地位。但社会党的崛起并不是一帆风顺的,而是与一定的政治制度和社会环境密切相关,更与社会党自身的组织建设和外部社会关系的调整息息相关。法国社会党执政过程中所积累的经验和教训可以给我们如下启示:要立足本源,扩大执政的群众基础;理顺党政关系,提高党的执政能力;吸收进步的社会思潮,丰富和发展党的理论;推动党的组织制度建设,充分发挥党内民主;完善中国共产党领导的多党合作和政治协商制度,建立广泛的统一战线。     

合法性资源与党的执政资源体系

中国共产党的执政资源是指党在科学执政、民主执政和依法执政的前提下 ,为增强执政能力、有效实现执政使命可资利用的各种积极因素与有利条件的总和。党的执政资源构成一个完整的体系 ,其主体部分包括党自身拥有的意识形态资源、组织资源和人才资源以及党在执政活动中产生的政治权力资源与合法性资源等。合法性资源在党的执政资源体系中处于核心地位。发展社会主义民主与法治是不断积累和优化党的合法性资源的根本途径。     

社会结构变迁中执政党的政治权威与公民政治参与

伴随着市场经济的发展和经济体制改革的深入,中国社会正向多元社会结构演化,建立在单一的社会结构和民众＂根本利益＂一致基础上的中国共产党的执政权威面临着前所未有的挑战。这必然要求重构公民与国家权力的关系,改革党的执政方式和执政体制,重树执政党的政治权威,从而使党的执政系统更具有包容力、整合力、弹性纠错力,以适应多元变化的执...     

德国社民党作为一个全民党的未来

一、全民党的角色和任务以民主的方式组织起来并植根于公民社会中的全民党,对于民主至关重要。在所有的政治组织中,全民党在政治体系和政治过程中扮演着关键角色,有以下两个理由为证:一是全民党能为社会整体制定出妥协性的政治纲领,协调各种社会利益、价值、公民社会倡议和公民组织之间的关系。由于全民党致力于争取多数的选民,在政治辩论过程中它们能构想出可     

Centralization in the Marxist and in the Leninist tradition

The very different positions of Marxists and Leninists on the issue of centralization of political and economic institutions show that, though using the same terminology, they were committed to different ideologies. Leninists were modernizing revolutionaries in underdeveloped countries seeking their rapid industrialization. They relied on centralized revolutionary movements, which, in power, formed centralized bureaucracies that advanced industrialization through mass persuasion, regimentation and terror as well as central planning.Marxists, associated with multifarious labor movements in industrialized countries, hoped to advance and empower the working class. Marx and Engels were vague on the subject of centralization, but condemned bureaucracy and came to favor the decentralization identified with the Paris Commune. Karl Kautsky and Otto Bauer advocated the operation of industry by local governments, cooperatives and trade unions and only minimal state ownership and sharply attacked bureaucracy. Policies of centralization were appropriate to the character and goals of Leninist movements but inappropriate to those of Marxist ones.     

寰球同此凉热：2008年国际形势新发展

从评估国际战略形势的视角看,2008年堪称是"9·11"以来最有特点的一年,其在国际关系史上的里程碑意义,可能要超过因"9·11事件"而著称的2001年,堪与冷战结束、苏联解体的1991年相提并论.对这一点,可能还需要经过一代人左右,才能看得更清楚.     

The changes in the migration patterns in the post-Soviet states: the first decade

Following a short-term burst of migration activity after the dissolution of the USSR, the current situation is marked by the unusually low population territorial mobility, defined by both the political and, increasingly, the socioeconomic factors. While this trend indicates some degree of minority accommodation, it also demonstrates the depth of economic crisis and increasing socioeconomic differentiation. Visible also is the disproportionate influence exercised by Russia on the formation of migration flows in the region. Remaining the major recipient of migrants, Russia increasingly plays a role of supplier of labor migrants to the West, and acts as a “bridge” for those attempting to reach Western Europe. Meanwhile, Russia still lacks an effective legislative base, institutional mechanisms, and political will for dealing with the new migration flows.     

Difficult choices in the new post-conflict agenda: the international community in Rwanda after the genocide

Since the genocide, development agencies have spent tens of millions of dollars in Rwanda on justice, governance, security and reconciliation - issues they used to consider far beyond their mandate until very recently. As a result, Rwanda has emerged as one of the countries where the new postconflict agenda is being most strongly implemented, under extremely difficult conditions. An analysis of donor behaviour in two high politics areas - the nature of the government and justice - shows that deep and unresolved ethical problems exist with this post-conflict agenda. Lack of information and understanding, conflicts between goals and principles, the difficulty of associating the people concerned in an equitable manner - all these and other issues render unclear the ethical basis upon which donors can base decisions which often have life and death implications for thousands of people.