Criminal responsibility for two consecutive crimes

Criminal legally responsible for responsibility in Israel his crimes unless the is defined in terms of polarity： all or nothing. An individual is court has determined that he is exculpated from criminal responsibility; there is no diminished criminal responsibility. The authors present a unique case where two expert psychiatrists determined that the accused was culpable for the first crime, rape, but was exculpated from criminal responsibility for the second crime, stabbing, which was committed immediately thereafter. As per the court approved plea bargain, the accused was charged only with rape, and was sentenced to incarceration in the psychiatric ward of the prison. The social significance of the expert psychiatric opinion and the court ruling will be examined in this paper.     

单足刑事责任与双足刑事责任--刑事责任的分类问题研究

刑事责任分类问题是刑事责任问题的"枝叶",对它的认识有助于对刑事责任的把握。思考中国本土文化,挖掘有价值的文化内涵是激扬刑事责任生命的催化剂。单(前、后)足刑事责任与双足刑事责任的分类是以犯罪行为人涉足犯罪行为的"深浅"为标准所作的程度类别分类。这种程度类别分式在立法上是得到表现的,对司法实践具有重要意义的。     

Criminal responsibility and cannabis use: psychiatric review and proposed guidelines

An evaluation of the criminal responsibility of an offender who has consumed cannabis necessitates knowledge of the effect of the product on the offender's mental state at the time of the alleged offense. However, the effects induced by cannabis are numerous and the forensic psychiatrist should base his diagnosis and his evaluation on facts which are as objective as possible. A selective literature review, using the computerized databases Medline, Psychlit and Embase, has been carried out to aid evaluation from a forensic psychiatry point of view. Biological means of cannabis detection, and the difficulties associated with using them to understand the clinical effect that the product has on any one user, are shown. Eight major categories which can be used in the domain of forensic psychiatry are detailed in this review: Acute usual effects, acute adverse effects, mood disturbance, acute toxic confusion, acute psychotic reaction, chronic paranoid psychosis, amotivational syndrome or other long term effects, and flashbacks. For each of these categories the effects of cannabis intoxication on cognitive and volitional capacities are analyzed, and guidelines for the evaluation of criminal responsibility are proposed.     

刑事一体化视野中的犯罪心理学

刑事一体化是指刑事立法、刑事司法、刑事科学三方面及其内部各方协调一致,形成有机统二的完整系统。在刑事一体化的视野中,犯罪心理学在关于“犯罪”这一基本概念上,应当与处于规范地位的刑法学保持一致。犯罪心理学是刑事科学的基础理论学科和应用学科,同时,由于其独特的学科性质、研究视觉和研究方法,使其在一体化的刑事科学中,具有不可替代的地位和作用。     

论刑事政策与刑法

刑事政策可表述为:国家或政党基于犯罪态势而制定的控制(预防)犯罪的方略,可分为基本的刑事政策和具体的刑事政策。指导刑法立法的刑事政策是基本刑事政策;影响刑法司法的刑事政策是具体刑事政策。只有在较长时期内涉及全过程的主要的刑事政策才是基本刑事政策。具体刑事政策,它相对于基本刑事政策而言,指在犯罪控制的某一领域或某一阶段中起作用的刑事政策。就刑事政策与刑法立法来讲,刑事政策即基本刑事政策是刑法的灵魂,刑事政策高于刑法;就刑事政策与刑法司法来讲,刑法则高于刑事政策即具体刑事政策,具体的刑事政策只能在刑法的框架内运作,但可以影响定罪与量刑。     

刑法理论与刑事立法

在刑事立法非常活跃的时代,刑法理论不可能只是单纯地解释刑法,而是需要同时关注刑事立法本身.刑法理论不仅要规制司法,而且要规制立法.刑法理论尤其是法益保护主义与有关刑罚的正当化根据的学说,对刑事立法起着重要规制作用;刑法理论必须对刑法条文作出有价值的判断,促进刑事立法的不断完善.但是,如果能够通过修改理论或者重新解释应对社会生活事实的,就不应当修改刑法;任何知识都是一种偏见,都是不完善、不全面的,但刑法学绝不是始终拘泥于条文的形式论解释的枯燥无味的学问;刑法学者应当善于了解社会生活事实的变化,勇于反省自己的前理解,正确对待自己的偏见,从而使旧法条适应新时代.对刑事立法的批判与解释并不是对立关系,批判性解释可以使刑事立法的形式缺陷得到弥补,也能为刑事立法的完善奠定基础.刑事立法也应当善于类型化,从而为解释提供应有的空间,使刑事立法与刑法理论形成良性互动关系.     

主观主义与中国刑法关系论纲--认真对待刑法主观主义

刑法主观主义作为西方刑法学说史上的重要思想,在我国刑法学界的地位却是尴尬的———刑法主观主义往往是作为被批判的对象,其本身所存在的合理内核却被人们所忽视。然而,中国传统法律思想、中国刑事立法的发展以及中国刑法的主客观相统一原则等都与刑法主观主义存在密切的联系,刑法主观主义的合理性不容抹杀,学界需要认真对待刑法主观主义。     

证券犯罪特征的犯罪学分析

证券犯罪是在证券发行与交易的各个必要环节中发生的违法行为 ,同时证券犯罪还具有法定犯罪、白领犯罪、共同犯罪、贪利犯罪等特征 ,对此深入分析可以使我们在预防和惩治证券犯罪时更加具有针对性。