恒大地产长沙引爆行业潜规则

在房价高企的中国，住房公积金一度拉近了老百姓与商品房的距离，但是地产商与银行勾结排斥住房公积金贷款的现实说明一切都是美丽的泡影，连恒大地产这样的所谓优质地产商都在拒绝公积金贷款，老百姓还能指望谁来实现“居者有其屋的梦想”？     

“官员公民”值得期待

湖南省临湘市政府副市长姜宗福,曾因写工作检讨,实名发帖炮轰张艺谋＂印象＂演出,引起网民的关注。4月18日他在红网发帖炮轰房价。不过他这次署名＂姜宗福＂,而不是上次炮轰张艺谋时所用的＂临湘市人民政府副市长姜宗福＂。＂个性官员＂的＂个性＂仍在,而＂官员＂身份却自我卸掉了。（北方网4月19日）     

南宁市政府“开门”清理红头文件

近日，广西壮族自治区南宁市人民政府开始对现行有效法规文件进行清理。与以往不同的是这次以“开门”清理的方式，邀请包括普通市民在内的社会各界人士参与政府红头文件的清理工作。     

长沙市民送“截访先进单位”锦旗

今年3月26日，浣铁军等多名房屋被拆迁居民集体到长沙市信访局赠送特制一面锦旗。锦旗的文字内容为“授予：长沙市人民政府二0一二年维稳工作、截访先进单位”。     

铲除“黑老大”演绎“无间道”

近来，重庆掀起一场“打黑除恶”风暴：一方面向涉枪、涉毒、涉赌等黑恶势力发起猛烈攻击，让众多横行已久的黑恶团伙呈雪崩式瓦解，一方面在政法队伍中展开肃清“内鬼”的行动，多名涉嫌充当“保护伞”的人员被调查。     

邱大志：演绎“双重角色”

“卷起春泥翻作浪．俯首奋蹄勤耕耘。”这是人们对农村“老黄牛”的美赞。今天,在他身上可以清晰地看到具有时代特色的“老黄牛”精神。他,始终不忘人大代表身份,积极履行代表职责．热心为百姓鼓与呼;他,为人低调,不事张扬,     

安防技术演绎“平安奥运”

“科技奥运”从理念到实现的过程，是对“平安奥运”的强有力支撑，推动了许多安防科技成果的转化。更重要的是，要做好后安防科技成果在奥运之后的推广，为后奥运时期安防科技成果的产业化打好基础。     

“照妖镜”演绎探案传奇

霍山县公安局刑警大队教导队员、痕检高级工程师张寅甲，26年的刑警征途中，先后9次受到县公安局的嘉奖，4次被霍山县委评为优秀共产党员，3次荣立个人三等功，被六安市委和市公安局授予“全市优秀思想政治工作者”和“优秀刑警”称号。2007年5月被公安部授予“全国优秀人民警察”称号。     

黑心窑主演绎当代“包身工”

张徐波，1986年出生于陕西省长安县斗门镇牛角村一个清贫的农户家里，因为是家里的第一个男孩，所以家里人特别疼爱他，在全家人的精心呵护下，他不但身强力壮，而且活泼可爱。     

论“非法演绎作品”的保护

对于非法演绎作品是否应受法律保护,其演绎者是否享有著作权,演绎者是否具有独立使用该作品的权利,是否有权对第三方的使用进行控制包括禁止?对这些问题目前仍有争论,一直以来,在立法、司法、学理上都存在比较严重的分歧。一、非法演绎作品的界定在讨论这些问题之前,我们首先应明确什么是非法演绎作品。按郑成思先生对演绎作品和原作品的关系的界定,所谓演绎作品,是指“从原作品中派生出的新作品。这种派生作品虽有后一创作者的精神成果在内,但又并未改变原作之创作思想的基本表达形式。”①。按这一观点,演绎作品和原作品的关系可以概括为…     

Russian Public Opinion in the Aftermath of the Ukraine Crisis

This article discusses changes in public opinion in Russia in 2014. The “anti-Putin minority” (about 20 percent of the population) have merged with the conservative pro-Putin majority and opted for loyalty to the Kremlin leadership. The main reason for this shift is rising uncertainty and insecurity, as well as fear of losing the relative prosperity gained in previous years.     

The Aftermath of Cyberstalking: School,Work, Social,and Health Costs of Victimization

American Journal of Criminal Justice - The harms crime victims experience extend far beyond the initial victimization and can have severe negative impacts on daily life. Using data collected via a...     

The Aftermath of 11 September 2001: Liberty vs. Security before the Supreme Court of Canada

The terrorist acts of 11 September 2001 and the war on terrorismthat followed have induced a pervasive sense of insecurity inCanada, as elsewhere, and brought about a shift of public policytowards a confinement of security risks in a global era. Inthe polity, as in the legal sphere, there has been an obviousshift of paradigm, from liberty to security. In December 2001,Canada passed an Anti-Terrorism Act. As far as human rightsand freedoms are concerned, the Anti-Terrorism Act is a farcry from the draconian measures of the American Patriot Act,with its military tribunals, incommunicado confinement, preventivedetention without charge, and potentially expeditious applicationof the death penalty. Nevertheless, the Canadian Anti-TerrorismAct remains, in nature, an emergency legislation. In particular,as will be seen here, there has been a clear change of mind,within the Supreme Court of Canada, regarding the authorityof international human rights law, at least where highly sensitivesecurity matters are involved, such as deportation of politicalrefugees suspected of being linked with terrorist organisations. To emphasize this shift in attitude, an analytical framework,allowing us to distinguish between various types of constitutionalreasoning, is needed. This heuristic device must also be sophisticatedenough to single out the emergency situation from the normalstate of affairs. This may not be apparent in day-to-day life,but, since 11 September, the concept of emergency, and the notionthat an exceptional state of affair exists, have been a majorinfluence on our political world.     

Protecting the Right to Housing in the Aftermath of Natural Disaster: Standards in International Human Rights Law

In 2006, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees reportedthat an average of 211 million people each year were directlyaffected by the accumulated impact of natural disasters.¹ Thisis approximately five times the number of people thought tohave been affected by conflict over the past decade.² It iscommonly expected that, as a result of climate change, populationgrowth and inappropriate urbanisation, the incidence, severityand impact of natural disasters will continue to rise. And yetwhile the obligations of states in situations of armed conflicthave been extensively debated, the applicability of human rightslaw in the aftermath of natural disaster has not been so widelyexamined by regional or international human rights bodies. Thispaper considers the obligations of governments in the aftermathof natural disasters, with a particular focus on the right tohousing. The applicability of human rights law (and specificallyeconomic, social and cultural rights) in the aftermath of naturaldisaster is considered in a general sense, followed by a discussionof the content of the right to housing, and the obligationsof governments to respect, protect and fulfil this right inthe course of responding to disaster. The question of whetherstates have an obligation to provide restitution, compensationor other form of reparation to those who have lost homes, landand property by reason of natural disaster is also discussed.The paper draws on examples from the Indian Ocean tsunami (2004),the Pakistan earthquake (2005) and the South Asian floods (2007),and identifies specific elements of government obligations thatare of particular importance in ensuring the right to adequatehousing in the aftermath of natural disaster.