共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
安乐死是一项非常复杂的社会问题与法律问题。当前,随着社会发展的需求和欧洲国家安乐死合法化运动的推动,公众要求在我国承认安乐死合法化的呼声也越来越高。但是,目前我国对待安乐死合法化仍是采取审慎的态度,而且安乐死合法化在我国开展确实存在着诸多困难。在我国现有法律规定范围内,安乐死在我国不仅没有合法化,而且由于它在形式上符合故意杀人罪的构成要件,出现了实施安乐死涉嫌故意杀人罪的状况。这都是我国盲目以犯罪构成四要件理论套用安乐死造成的。因此,要通过着重在刑法理论上论证安乐死非犯罪化的同时,提出一些适合我国安乐死合法化实行的制度构想,以推动安乐死合法化在我国的进程。相信在大家不懈的努力下,安乐死合法化最终一定会在我国得到宽容与认可。 相似文献
2.
犯罪化与非犯罪化论纲 总被引:16,自引:0,他引:16
在人以为本的社会系统中,刑法作为社会的调控手段,其政策定位必须与社会政策保持应有的良好的衔接;刑法的触角不宜伸得太长,其出入罪机制及其向度必须以和谐社会的建构为基本标志、判断标准和生存规则。虽然和谐社会的建构最终需要从源头上协调各种冲突,刑法调控只是其中的一个环节。但是,深入研究犯罪化与非犯罪化问题,对于有效协调刑法与社会的关系,仍然具有重要意义。 相似文献
3.
4.
贿赂的手段变化无穷,其中以"性交易"为内容的一种贿赂方式正在日益引起社会公众的关注,俗称:性贿赂;在政治经济体制转轨的今天,性贿赂严重地败坏了民风、政风、党风、社风,正成为严重腐败社会的一种公害,但现行刑法却对其不闻不问。我们应从界定性贿赂概念产分析立法现状入手,从性贿赂的社会危害性和关于性贿赂的世界立法趋势两个方面探讨性贿赂犯罪化的必要性。 相似文献
5.
6.
非犯罪化、非刑罚化之理性分析——报应刑刑事政策视角的观察 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
非犯罪化、非刑罚化是现代刑法改革的重要议题之一。但是,关于非犯罪化、非刑罚化的合理性问题仍需进一步加以研究。过去,学者们往往从某些行为是否具有社会危害性的角度,来论证使这些行为非犯罪化的合理性问题。本文认为,使一些行为非犯罪化的主要不是因为这些行为具有社会危害性,而是因为刑法能否对这些行为进行有效干预。另外,有些学者认为报应刑理念是与非犯罪化、非刑罚化相冲突的,要实现犯罪化、非刑罚化必须放弃报应性理念。本文认为,非犯罪化、非刑罚化与报应刑理念并不冲突,用报应刑理念完全可以解释非犯罪化、非刑罚化的合理性问题。 相似文献
7.
犯罪危害性是我国传统刑法理论的核心概念.历来的学说对犯罪危害性评价缺乏系统、全面的分析,致使犯罪危害性评价晚近以来多受诟病.实际上,犯罪危害性评价不仅具有深刻的理论内涵,而且也蕴含着丰富的辩证思想.运用辩证思维把握犯罪危害性评价的属性不仅有助于犯罪危害性评价的科学化与合理化,而且对于进一步明确犯罪的危害性的学科地位也大有裨益. 相似文献
8.
群体性考试舞弊现象之风严重冲击了统一考试的严肃性和权威性,已经在全国造成了恶劣的影响。群体性考试舞弊行为的防范和惩治机制应以"内外兼顾、多管齐下、防控并举"为基本原则,从考试舞弊行为的防范和惩治两方面探讨遏制群体性考试舞弊行为切实可行、具有可操作性的对策及措施。 相似文献
9.
高校学生考试舞弊现象的调查分析与对策探讨 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
《法制与社会》2008,(13)
本文通过对高校学生考试舞弊行为的问卷调查,具体分析了考生舞弊的动机、舞弊的方式、舞弊的危害性,并从如何加强考试管理、改进教学方式等方面着手进行调整从而有效减少舞弊行为进行了探讨。 相似文献
10.
毛玲玲 《华东政法大学学报》2011,14(4):25-33
犯罪化与非犯罪化都有其各自独立的价值。在立法的犯罪化趋势不可逆转之际,对某种危害性行为的入罪与设刑、定性与定量必须探寻最为适当的设置模式。目前在犯罪化与非犯罪化的进程中,我国刑法理论学说对于犯罪构成、刑法解释的方法等问题,可谓百花齐放、聚讼纷纭,亟需创建合理的司法技术规则,并以严密的推断及论证过程确立司法规则的科学性与权威性。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
公证作为一项预防性的法律制度,我国在建国初期即已建立。1996年,我国颁布了《公证法》,取代了1982年的《公证暂行条例》。《公证法》构筑了我国公证制度的基本框架,初步确立了公证机构和公证人员进行虚假公证行为的民事、行政制裁体系。与此相对,虚假公证的刑事制裁规范仍是目前缺失的一环,而西安“宝马”彩票案等虚假公证有关案件的发生,更凸显了深入思索此类行为人罪化的必要性和紧迫性。 相似文献
14.
François Tanguay-Renaud 《Criminal Law and Philosophy》2013,7(2):255-284
In this article, I ask whether the state, as opposed to its individual members, can intelligibly and legitimately be criminalized, with a focus on the possibility of its domestic criminalization. I proceed by identifying what I take to be the core objections to such criminalization, and then investigate ways in which they can be challenged. First, I address the claim that the state is not a kind of entity that can intelligibly perpetrate domestic criminal wrongs. I argue against it by building upon an account of the modern state as a moral agent proper, capable of both culpable moral and legal wrongdoing. I then consider objections to the intelligibility and legitimacy of subjecting states to domestic criminal processes, which primarily find their source in the assumption that such subjection would necessarily involve the state prosecuting, judging, and punishing itself. I argue that whether this (questionable) assumption is sound or not, it does not create the kinds of unsolvable quandaries its exponents think it does. I then move on to reject the distinct, yet related, objection that, at least in aspiring liberal jurisdictions, treating the state as a criminal objectionably involves extending to it various substantive and procedural guarantees that, given its nature and raison d’être, it should not have. Finally, I discuss three central objections to punishing the state. First, that organizations like states do not have the phenomenal consciousness required to suffer punishment. Second, that the constant possibility of dispersion of state punishment amongst individual members stands in the way of its justification. Lastly, that whatever justification there may be for making things harder for the state in response to its culpable wrongdoing, such treatment need not be understood as punishment. While partially conceding the strength of these objections, I strive to loosen their grip in ways that show that justified punishment of the state, meaningfully understood as such, remains a distinct possibility. I conclude by contrasting supposed alternatives to the criminalization of states, and by contending that my analysis leaves us with enough to keep the possibility of state criminalization on the table as a justifiable response to state wrongdoing. 相似文献
15.
This article begins with the widespread expectation that followingthe money trail would be an effective means of hamperingterrorist activity. So far, however, that effectiveness hasbeen less than certain, and financial services providers arguethat, at most, they would be able to check names against lists(they are adamant that the risk-based approach does not applyhere). Legal difficulties deepen the factual problems: boldstatements in international Conventions that terrorist activitiesare not political crimes, do not really solve the fundamentaldilemma that a distinction needs to be made between freedomfighters and terrorists if combatants are merely aiming at therestoration of the democratic order. On a more practical level,international organizations (namely the United Nations and theFinancial Action Task Force on Money Laundering) have createda system of mechanisms to freeze suspected funds of terrorism.So far, the procedures for freezing and de-freezing do not meetthe generally accepted standards of a fair hearing (as definedby the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rightsor the European Convention on Human Rights). The author concludesthat the current way of dealing with the issue of financingof terrorism is far from convincing. 相似文献
16.
“欺诈市场理论”研究 总被引:15,自引:0,他引:15
本文紧紧围绕因果关系的确定这一证券民事责任的核心问题 ,详细介绍了美国“欺诈市场理论”产生和发展的过程、“欺诈市场理论”所依据的金融学理论基础以及适用这一理论的市场条件 ,指出我国目前尚不具备全面引入“欺诈市场理论”的客观条件。作者还分析了最高人民法院《1 9规定》第 18、19及 2 0条所体现的制度创新及其存在的不足 ,初步提出了弥补这些不足的措施 相似文献
17.
我国网络游戏(以下简称“网游”)产业链延伸广泛,网游市场商机巨大。围绕网游形成的庞大的利益网络,是以运营商为核心的产业链(如图l所示)。运营商连接了游戏开发商和销售网络。电信公司和设备供应商也与网游运营商产生商业关系:电信公司提供IDC(联网数据中心)服务,设备供应商提供服务器用以存储网游程序(包括数据)。与游戏衍生产品和服务相关的网站、网吧和传统出版业也处在网游产业链中。我国特有的“外挂产业”也依存于网游产业链。其利益网络也形成了一个产业链(如图2所示)。 相似文献
18.
19.
Critical Criminology - There is an emergent interest by criminologists in theorising problems that arise when states breach conventional legal norms. This article considers the criminalisation of... 相似文献
20.
诈骗罪的理论通说一般认为,实施欺诈的行为人通过虚假意思说明引起了被害人的错误认识。因此,诈骗罪中的欺诈必须是以虚假信息为前提的行为。但如果根据正常的社会交往经验和规则,从行为人的意思说明中间接得出的结论表明,他作出了符合事实的意思说明,在引起被害人错误认识的前提下,该行为同样构成欺诈。由此可见,诈骗罪中的欺诈行为并不必然以虚假信息为前提。对行为人这种作出事实性说明的欺诈,无论认知优势理论还是危险支配理论,都不能合理地理解这种行为。因此,必须从理论上对这种欺诈作出新的论证。 相似文献