珠海地区汉族人群10个Y-STR基因座的多态性

目的 调查珠海地区汉族人群10个Y-STR基因座及其单倍型的遗传多态性，探讨其法医学应用价值。方法 应用Y-PLEX荧光标记复合扩增系统，对珠海地区汉族200名无关男性个体进行10个Y-STR基因座的复合扩增，用ABI310型基因分析仪对扩增产物进行检测，统计10个Y-STR基因座的群体遗传学参数。结果 9个Y-STR基因座分别检出5、6、6、5、4、5、5、5、7个等位基因，DYS385基因座检出44种单倍型；GD值最低为0.3904(DYS391)，最高为0.9497(DYS385)；10个Y-STR基因座共同构成的单倍型161种，其中134种单倍型只出现1次，20种单倍型出现2次，3种单倍型出现3次，3种单倍型出现4次，1种单倍型出现5次，累计GD值为0.9948。结论 10个Y-STR基因座具有较高的个体识别能力，可应用于法庭科学中的个体识别与亲权鉴定。     

浙江汉族人群16个Y-STR基因座遗传多态性调查

目的进一步完善浙江省汉族人群Y-STR基因座遗传多态性研究,为其法医学应用提供基础数据。方法应用Y-filer荧光标记复合扩增系统,对浙江汉族203名无关男性个体进行16个STR基因座的复合扩增,统计各基因座的群体遗传学参数。结果其中15个Y-STR基因座分别检出4~13个等位基因,DYS385基因座检出47种单倍型,GD值为0.3918~0.9609;观察到16个Y-STR基因座共同构成的单倍型199种,其中196种单倍型出现1次,2种出现2次,1种出现3次,累计GD值为0.9998。结论16个Y-STR基因座具有较强的个体识别能力,适合浙江法庭科学应用。     

云南汉族人群11个Y-STR基因座遗传多态性调查及法医学应用

目的调查11个Y-STR基因座及其单倍型在云南汉族人群中的遗传多态性分布,探讨其法医学应用价值,为法医学应用提供基础数据。方法应用Powerplex!Y系统对云南汉族201名无关男性个体进行11个Y-STR基因座的复合扩增,用ABI310型基因分析仪对扩增产物进行检测,统计其群体遗传学参数。结果Powerplex!Y系统前10个Y-STR基因座分别检出3、5、6、8、5、4、5、8、4、7个等位基因,DYS385a/b基因座检出56种单倍型;GD值最低为0.4273(DYS438),最高为0.9747(DYS385a/b);观察到11个Y-STR基因座共同构成的单倍型175种,其中有154种单倍型只出现1次,16种出现2次,5种出现3次,累计GD值为0.9984。结论11个Y-STR基因座具有较强的个体识别能力,可应用于云南地区汉族人群的个体识别与亲权鉴定。     

浙江汉族人群6个Y—STR基因座的遗传多态性调查及法医学应用

目的获得6个Y-STR基因座及其单倍型在浙江汉族人群中的遗传多态性分布,并探讨其法医学应用价值。方法应用Y-plex荧光标记复合扩增系统,对浙江汉族200名无关男性个体进行6个STR基因座的复合扩增,用ABI3100型基因分析仪对扩增产物进行检测,统计6个Y-STR基因座的群体遗传学参数。结果其中5个Y-STR基因座分别检出5、7、6、6、5个等位基因,DYS385基因座检出47种单倍型,GD值最低为0.4275(DYS391),最高为0.9584(DYS385);观察到6个Y-STR基因座共同构成的单倍型159种,其中有132种单倍型只出现1次,16种出现2次,6种出现3次,2种出现4次,2种出现5次,累计GD值为0.9967。结论6个Y-STR基因座具有较强的个体识别能力,可应用于浙江法庭科学中的个体识别与亲权鉴定。     

天津汉族人群12个Y-STR基因座的遗传多态性

目的　建立天津汉族 2 10名无关男性人群 12个Y STR基因座单倍型分布基础遗传数据库。探讨其法医学应用价值。方法　应用PowerPlex YSystem (PromegeCorporation ,USA)荧光标记复合扩增系统、ABI 310 /377型基因分析仪进行检测 ,统计各基因座的单倍体基因频率 ,计算其GD值即基因差异性 (GeneDiversi ty)。结果　 12个Y STR基因座中共检出 2 0 8种单倍型。其中 ,2 0 6种单倍型均出现 1次 ,2种单倍型出现 2次。GD值在 0 32 5 9～ 0 8810之间 ,累计GD值 (TGD)为 0 9999988。另对 2 8个父性家系调查显示 :同一家系(2～ 7名男性 ) 12个Y STR基因座单倍型一致。结论　天津汉族 12个Y STR基因座多态性分布良好 ,父系遗传稳定 ,适用于法庭科学中的个体识别和亲权鉴定     

北京汉族人群三个Y染色体STR基因座的遗传多态性研究

目的　获得DYS4 37,A7 1,H4三个Y染色体STR基因座及其单倍型在北京汉族人群中的遗传多态性分布 ,并探讨其法医学应用价值。方法　应用自行建立的Y STR 15 plex复合扩增体系 ,对用酚 /氯仿法提取的 132份北京地区汉族无关男性个体血样DNA样品进行复合扩增 ,用ABI310型遗传分析仪对扩增产物进行检测 ,统计分析 3个Y STR基因座的群体遗传学参数。结果　DYS4 37,A7 1,H4三个Y STR基因座在该群体中分别检出 4 ,5 ,4个等位基因 ,GD值分别为 0 4 977,0 6 731,0 5 42 0 ;观察到 32种单倍型 ,其中 17种单倍型出现 1次 ,最多 1种单倍型出现 2 0次 ,单倍型累积GD值为 0 9118。结论　 3个Y STR基因座具有较强的个体识别能力 ,在法医学个体识别和亲权鉴定中具有很高的应用价值     

4个STR基因座在广东汉族人群的单倍型分布

调查DYS19、DYS390和DYS389Ⅰ/Ⅱ基因座在广东汉族群体的单倍型分布。PCR扩增后,用不连续PAGE电泳系统分型。在130名无关男性个体中,共检出81种不同的单倍型,其中52种只出现过1次。4个基因座单倍型的遗传多样性、个体识别率和非父排除率分别为0.9989,0.9824,0.9824,结果表明,4个STR基因座的单倍型检测在法医学个体识别和亲权鉴定方面有较高的应用价值。     

河南汉族人群9个Y-STR基因座遗传多态性

本文对中国河南地区汉族102个健康无关个体进行9个Y-STR(DYS626、DYS504、DYS505、DYS576、DYS532、DYS594、DYS522、DYS540)基因座遗传多态性调查。采用苯酚-氯仿提取样本DNA,用2×Taq PCR MasterMix进行扩增及检测。结果在102个Y-STR基因座共检出101种单倍型,其中100种单倍型是唯一的,单倍型基因多样性为0.999 4。其分布符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡定律(P0.05)。所调查的河南汉族人群9个Y-STR基因座具有较好识别能力。     

中国汉族人群46个Y-STR基因座多态性与突变调查

目的调查分析46个Y-STR基因座在中国汉族人群中的遗传多态性与突变情况。方法收集中国汉族人群1 008名无关男性个体、1 124对父子共2 165份男性血样。采用Yfiler PlusTM、AGCU Y-24、GFS 24Y 3种复合扩增试剂盒进行46个Y-STR基因座分型,统计各基因座群体遗传学参数与突变情况。结果 1 008名中国汉族无关男性个体,共检出1 001种单倍型,其中994种仅出现1次,总体单倍型多样性值(HD)和识别能力(DC)分别为0.999 986和0.993 1。46个基因座共检出548个等位基因,基因多样性值(GD)在0.432 0~0.953 2之间,37个基因座GD值大于0.6。1 124对父子共检测出51 739次等位基因传递,193对父子41个基因座共观察到214次突变,平均突变率为4.1×10-3(95%CI 3.6~4.7×10-3)。其中一步突变209次(97.7%),两步突变5次(2.3%);175对仅1个基因座发生突变(90.7%)。结论本文46个Y-STR基因座中大多数在中国汉族人群中具有较高的遗传多态性,适合法医学应用,高突变率基因座在Y-STR数据库家系查询与父系鉴定应用中应予以关注。     

辽宁汉族27个Y-STR基因座的遗传多态性

<正>在法医学亲子鉴定和个体识别中,Y染色体STR基因座(Y-STR)具有独特的优势,主要是由于其男性伴性遗传的特点[1-2]。在一些强奸案件的鉴定中,YSTR分型可以提供男性嫌疑人的遗传信息,并且基因分型结果不受女性成分的影响[3]。此外,Y-STR基因座缺乏重组,具有独特的单倍型特征,在了解人类群体特征和进化等方面具有重要的作用[4]。本研究拟调查获得中国辽宁汉族群体27个Y-STR基因座的遗     

癫痫的神经病理学研究进展

癫是一种常见的脑疾病,可引起猝死,以往人们侧重于对癫脑电活动的研究,而近年来癫的神经病理学研究已成为临床和法医工作者的一个研究热点。本文依据一系列文献资料分别从癫的发育障碍、瘤性异常增殖、海马硬化、双重病理改变、苔藓纤维发芽等神经病理学变化方面进行综述,进而探讨其法医学意义,希望对癫猝死的法医病理学诊断提供一定的帮助。     

Drugs in injured drivers in Denmark

As part of the project Impaired Motorists, Methods of Roadside Testing and Assessment for Licensing (IMMORTAL) under the European Commission's Transport RTD Programme of the 5th Framework Programme [I.M. Bernhoft, Drugs in accidents involved drivers in Denmark, D-R4.3 of the project Impaired Motorists, Methods Of Roadside Testing and Assessment for Licensing (IMMORTAL), www.immortal.or.at, 2005], a study regarding drugs in accident-involved drivers was carried out in Denmark. The main objectives of this study were: (1) to collect and analyse samples from injured drivers for the presence of drugs; (2) to give an indication whether drugs may have contributed to traffic accidents; and (3) to get information on the drug-positive drivers and their drug use. This paper focuses on objective 1. Injured drivers who were treated in hospital were asked to give a saliva sample, a blood sample or both. The samples were screened for the following substances: opiates, amphetamines, methamphetamines, incl. MDMA (ecstasy), cannabinoids and metabolites, cocaine and metabolites and benzodiazepines. Screenings were carried out by means of Cozart Microplate EIA kit. Positive screenings were confirmation analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) or liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). In total, 26 out of 330 patients were confirmed positive for one or more of the six drug groups. However, three patients were excluded from the survey for various reasons. Of the remaining 23 drug-positive patients 15 were found positive for one drug group, and in five of these cases alcohol was present in a concentration over the legal limit in Denmark (0.05%). The other eight patients were found positive for two drug groups, and in four of these cases, alcohol was also present in a concentration over the legal limit. Alcohol was found both in combinations with medicinal drugs, with illegal drugs and with both. Based on the saliva or blood concentrations, we estimate that there is a strong suspicion of impairment in 9 out of 23 cases, and in another six cases it was likely that the drivers were impaired.     

当代国际行刑领域正在发生的变革

20世纪70年代由于监狱人满为患,重新犯罪率持续不降,很多国家开始在行刑领域进行改革。其基本内容包括:拓宽行刑目的,从矫正目的论发展到矫正、惩罚、帮助罪犯重返社会与剥夺多元目的论;改革监狱管理制度,从实施累进处遇制发展到推行危险管理制度;变革矫正制度,将"传统矫正"制度发展为"项目矫正"。我国需要研究国际社会在行刑领域的行刑变革理论与实践。     

德国土地征收中的公共利益

德国《基本法》第14条将所有权作为宪法基本权利予以保护。该条公共利益条款的本质出发点是保护私人所有权。公共利益概念在德国土地征收法上依据通说认为应作狭义理解,非所有公共利益均可满足征收法上的要件。部门法对公共利益有明确规定。学说和实务界对公共利益概念主要在负面达成了一致。就所谓的商业征收并未一般性否定。公共利益本身也与征收的必要性紧密相关。     

科学与法律领域的真相

审判过程并非仅仅是为了"查明真相"。自从美国的法律系统开始使用科学证人以来,法律领域就面临着混乱的局面。自从Frye规则到Daubert标准再到Kumho Tire标准,乃至发展为修改后的《联邦证据规则》702条,尽管法律系统经历了上述诸多努力,人们仍然不会相信法律系统能够从科学信息中获得预期的收益。科学主张和理论或真或假,它们的真或假是一个客观的问题。法律裁决可以断定法律真理为真,也可以断定"所谓的科学真理"为真。只有科学命题所描述的自然界现象和事件的性质——而非有关证据可靠性的法律裁决,也非法庭上的论证和交叉询问——能够证明真的科学命题为真,证明假的科学命题为假。     

Fatal poisoning in drug addicts in the Nordic countries in 2007

The frequency of medico-legally examined fatal poisonings in 2007 among drug addicts was investigated in five Nordic countries; Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. The number of deaths, age, sex, place of death, main intoxicant, and other drugs present in blood samples were recorded to obtain national and comparable Nordic data, as well as data to compare with earlier studies in 2002, 1997, and 1991. Norway had the highest incidence of drug addict deaths by poisoning followed by Denmark, with 8.24 and 6.92 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively. The death rates in Finland (4.02), Iceland (4.56), and Sweden (3.53) were about half that of Norway and Denmark. Compared with earlier studies, the death rates were unchanged in Denmark and Norway, but increased in Finland, Iceland, and Sweden. In all countries, fewer deaths (29-35%) were recorded in the capital area compared with earlier studies. Females accounted for 11-19% of the fatal poisonings. Iceland deviates with a more equal distribution between men and women (40%). Deaths from methadone overdoses increased in all Nordic countries, and methadone was the main intoxicant in Denmark in 2007, accounting for 51% of the poisonings. In Norway and Sweden, heroin/morphine was still the main intoxicant with a frequency of 68% and 48%, respectively. In Iceland, 3 deaths each were due to heroin/morphine and methadone, respectively. Finland differs from other Nordic countries in having a high number of poisonings caused by buprenorphine and very few caused by heroin/morphine. The total number of buprenorphine deaths in Finland doubled from 16 in 2002 to 32 in 2007, where it constituted 25% of deaths. The general toxicological screening program showed widespread multi-drug use in all countries. The median number of drugs per case varied from 3 to 5. The most frequently detected substances were heroin/morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, tramadol, amphetamine, cocaine, tetrahydrocannabinol, benzodiazepines and ethanol.     

2008年中国法治亮点巡礼

2008年，是中国法治进程稳步推进和稳健发展的一年，也是法治亮点频频闪现的一年。2008年的立法景观依然多姿多彩，科学立法、民主立法继续推进，公民对立法工作的有序参与进一步扩大，已出台的十一届全国人大常委会立法规划值得人们期待。此外，实施不久的《政府信息公开条例》、全面开展的监狱体制改革，以及此起彼伏的问责风暴等都是值得我们关注的法治亮点。     

Developments in cybercrime law and practice in Ethiopia

With increasing access to information and communication technologies such as the Internet, Ethiopia has recently taken responsive legislative measures. One such legislative measure is enactment of cybercrime rules as part of the Criminal Code of 2004. These rules penalize three items of computer crimes namely hacking, dissemination of malware and denial of service attacks. The cybercrime rules are however slightly outdated due to changes that have occurred in the field of cybercrime since the enactment of the Code. The surge of new varieties of cybercrimes previously uncovered under the Code and the need to legislate tailored evidentiary and procedural rules for investigation and prosecution of cybercrimes have recently prompted the Ethiopian government to draft modern and comprehensive cybercrime legislation, but the draft law still needs further work on cybercrimes in light of other major legislative developments at regional and national levels. This article closely examines major developments in cybercrime law and practice in Ethiopia since the enactment of the first set of cybercrime rules and proffers recommendations towards a unified cybercrime regime.     

Recent Trends in Sentencing Policies in the Netherlands

This article considers sentencing in the Netherlands and in particular the changes that have been introduced since the 1980s, both in the adult and in the juvenile justice system. Several questions will be treated in the article. Sentencing in the Netherlands in the last two decades is analysed and some explanations for the changing trends are presented. Results indicate that the Netherlands is following a general pattern, prevalent in Europe and the US, of more punitive and repressive punishment. Also, the extent to which new sentencing options, such as community sanctions have made a difference to the upward trend in imprisonment, will be analysed. In an effort to reduce the costs of the system new policies are being developed, introducing both 'front door' and 'back door' varieties in sentencing. These will lead to some important and radical changes in the criminal justice system.     

日本国家赔偿特别领域要论

国会立法的内容被法院认定违反宪法时 ,属于国家赔偿法上的违法 ;立法不作为时 ,法院承认国会有广泛的立法裁量权 ,但也认为存在违法性不作为的情形。因行政权限不行使发生损害时 ,成立国家的赔偿责任 ,但受到国民法益的性质、违反的义务的性质、注意义务的基准等因素的影响。关于非权力作用 ,理论与判例均未形成一致认识 ,但在学校事故事件、行政指导及信息提供等方面 ,已有适用国家赔偿法的倾向。