"接触"DNA在法医STR检验中的研究

目前,在获得法庭DNA证据过程中,经常遇到衣物和床单上提取的混合斑迹分型结果.经由穿着或睡觉者与衣物、床单的接触,含有微量DNA的上皮细胞会遗留在上述物品上.为了评估这些微量"接触"DNA的意义,作者研究了这种正常条件下使用的衣物上微量DNA的转移程度,给实际办案提供参考.     

子弹击发对弹壳接触DNA提取检验效率的影响

正在涉枪类等恐怖分子犯罪中,弹壳是最重要生物物证之一,这类生物检材的DNA提取和检验存在一定的难度。此外子弹击发的瞬间高温可能使得接触DNA破坏以及子弹击发过程的剧烈震动使得弹壳上粘附的细胞脱落,也导致弹壳接触DNA的有效提取难度加大,成为困扰广大检验人员的难点。本文拟通     

葡萄胎的DNA检验

本文利用STR复合扩增技术对1例强奸致孕案件中的胚胎组织进行了检验,结果获得了一种罕见的DNA分型（见图1）,其15个STR基因座均表现为纯合子。结合临床与病理检验结果,确定为葡萄胎。     

人体接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响

目的比较3种常见的接触检材前处理方式对磁珠法提取DNA效果的影响。方法收集烟蒂、牙刷、纱线手套各10份;分别采用95℃、70℃直接裂解和TNE、SDS、PK预消化方式进行前处理,再用磁珠法提取纯化DNA,并进行DNA定量,统计提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值;同时用Sinofiler复合扩增系统进行STR分型检测。结果 3种方法前处理后用磁珠提取的DNA纯度均较高I,PC CT值在26.63～27.19之间。用预消化法获得的DNA量高于裂解法,而95℃裂解与70℃裂解方法提取的DNA量无显著性差异。STR扩增检测结果亦表明,采用预消化法处理的样品STR分型成功率高于裂解法9,5℃与70℃裂解方法处理的样品STR分型成功率无显著性差异。结论人体接触检材采用预消化磁珠法提取DNA,有助于提高STR检验成功率。     

从打火机上提取DNA成功分型1例

2009年8月在某市发生一起盗窃保险柜案件，勘查人员在勘查现场时在被撬开的保险柜中发现一支一次性打火机，怀疑是犯罪嫌疑人所留。为明确案情，将打火机送检，并成功对其表面提取的DNA进行了STR分型。     

梨核上检出DNA确定嫌疑人1例

1案例资料 某年8月某日，在某市发生一起入室盗窃案件，勘查人员在勘查现场时在地面发现一个吃剩的梨核，确定是犯罪嫌疑人所留。为明确案情，将梨核送检。笔者采用干棉签擦拭牙印和果皮部咬痕边缘部位，     

光滑载体上接触DNA的检验

接触DNA是指通过皮肤接触而遗留在客体表面人体皮肤脱落上皮细胞的DNA[1].通常遗留在光滑载体（如刀柄、手枪等）表面接触DNA较少,检验难度较大.对于这类检材,较常采用硅珠法、磁珠法或Chelex-100法进行DNA提取,但成功率不高.本文尝试采用直接扩增法（简称直扩法）进行检验,收到了很好的效果,报道如下.     

DNA IQ磁珠法结合Maxwell~（TM） 16自动仪提取接触DNA

目的研究DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪对接触DNA提取的应用价值。方法 151份案件接触DNA检材95℃裂解后,采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪提取DNA,然后进行DNA定量和STR分型检测,统计各种类型的接触DNA含量I、PC CT值和STR分型成功率。结果 151份案件接触DNA检材中,除果核平均DNA获得量为9.51ng以外,其它接触检材的平均DNA获得量均大于10ng,烟蒂检验成功率最高为93%,果核检验成功率较低,为60%。所有DNA样品的IPC CT值均在27左右,纯度高。结论大部分接触DNA检材采用DNA IQ磁珠法结合MaxwellTM 16自动仪可提取到足以进行STR分型的DNA。     

头盔上附着微量DNA的检验1例

1材料与方法1·1案例某地发生的系列抢劫案中,提取到现场遗留的摩托车头盔1顶,其上未见明显斑迹。1·2方法(1)采用棉签二步法[1]擦拭头盔上与口鼻相对应的内侧部位。(2)剪取擦拭后棉签放入0·5ml Eppendorf管中,加400μl纯水清洗,离心,去上清,保留约20μl液体和沉淀物。(3)加5%Chelex-100 200μl、PK(5mg/ml)10μl,56℃温育1hr。(4)振荡,100℃8min,振荡,13000r/min离心3min。(5)取上清液150μl,采用DNA IQTM系统(Promega Cat.#DC6700)浓缩纯化。(6)在Applied Biosystems公司的9700型Ge-neAmp PCR System上进行10μl体系的Identifi…     

Chelex法和两种磁珠法提取接触DNA效果的比较

目的比较Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对接触DNA的提取效果。方法将稀释为10ng、100ng的标准品DNA,分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法处理;对30例烟蒂和30例牙刷分别采用Chelex法、DNA IQ磁珠法和EQ国产磁珠法提取DNA,然后进行PCR定量和STR检测。结果Chelex法对DNA的提取无损失,DNA IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法对DNA的提取均有不同程度的损失;烟蒂、牙刷等检材采用Chelex法提取的接触DNA量和IPC CT值显著高于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法,但STR检验成功率却低于IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法。2种磁珠法提取的DNA量、IPC CT值和STR检验成功率无显著性差异。结论污染轻、杂质少的接触DNA检材,用Chelex法提取最为方便快捷;IQ磁珠法、EQ国产磁珠法更适合污染接触DNA检材的提取及自动化操作。     

Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis

Touch DNA has become increasingly important evidence in todays' forensic casework. However, due to its invisible nature and typically minute amounts of DNA, the collection of biological material from touched objects remains a particular challenge that underscores the importance of the best collection methods for maximum recovery efficiency. So far, swabs moistened with water are often utilized in forensic crime scene investigations for touch DNA sampling, even though an aqueous solution provokes osmosis, endangering the cell's integrity. The aim of the research presented here was to systematically determine whether DNA recovery from touched glass items can be significantly increased by varying swabbing solutions and volumes compared with water-moistened swabs and dry swabbing. A second objective was to investigate the possible effects of storage of swab solutions prior to genetic analysis on DNA yield and profile quality when stored for 3 and 12 months, as is often the case with crime scene samples. Overall, the results indicate that adapting volumes of the sampling solutions had no significant effect on DNA yield, while the detergent-based solutions performed better than water and dry removal, with the SDS reagent yielding statistically significant results. Further, stored samples showed an increase in degradation indices for all solutions tested, but no deterioration in DNA content and profile quality, allowing for unrestricted processing of touch DNA samples stored for at least 12 months. One further finding was a strong intraindividual change in DNA amounts observed over the 23 deposition days which may be related to the donor's menstrual cycle.     

接触DNA在法医实践中的应用研究进展

人体在接触物体后,会在其表面留下少量接触DNA。对接触DNA的检验是目前法医DNA检验技术的热点和难点。接触DNA的检验成功率差异较大,受各环节多重因素影响。影响接触DNA检验成功率的主要因素有接触DNA检材的准确发现、接触DNA的提取与纯化以及扩增策略的选择和结果分析等。本文详述了接触DNA检验过程的进展及研究展望。     

制定我国罪犯DNA数据库管理规范的探讨

在司法鉴定领域,基因遗传分析技术已广泛地应用于个体识别和亲权鉴定检案之中,特别是利用DNA分型技术建立罪犯DNA数据库作为刑事案件侦破手段的设想,就其技术而言已逐步走向成熟和现实.近几年来美国和西欧一些国家相继建立了以PCR-STR分型技术为基础的罪犯DNA数据库,并且也已制定了相关的法律法规以此规范数据库的整个运作过程.1999年我国司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所开展和完成了"中国罪犯DNA数据库模式库"的研究工作,可以预计正式建立我国国家罪犯DNA数据库只是个时间问题,因此进行有关罪犯DNA数据库法律法规制定的研究工作是必须的,它是我国国家罪犯DNA数据库得以顺利建立和高效运作的重要保障之一.     

3种提取胶带粘面汗潜指印中DNA的方法比较

目的比较胶带粘面汗潜指印中DNA提取的方法。方法分别采用硅珠法、QIAMicrokit法、硅珠-QIAMicrokit法提取胶带粘面的汗潜指印中DNA,STR复合扩增,荧光电泳检测。结果用QIAMicrokit法、硅珠-QIAMicrokit法提取胶带粘面汗潜指印中DNA,检测成功率分别为21%和36%。硅珠法检测未获成功。结论硅珠-QIAMicrokit法提取胶带粘面汗潜指印中的DNA比QIAMicrokit法,检验时间更短,检测成功率更高。     

Optimization of the collection and analysis of touch DNA traces

The aim of this work was to optimize a strategy for detection, collection, and analysis of touch DNA traces. 4N6FLOWSwabs™ and cotton swabs were compared by collecting touch DNA traces from glass slides and gun shell casings. Shed cells were visualized using Diamond™ nucleic acid dye and a digital fluorescent microscope. Different collection and extraction methods were tested. Collected samples were amplified with the AmpFlSTR® NGMSElect™ kit and the Precision ID mtDNA Whole Genome Panel.     

96孔过滤板在接触性DNA自动化检验中的应用

目的将96孔过滤板用于自动化工作站,对接触性DNA进行检验。方法收集553份现场提取的附着在烟蒂、饮料瓶、门窗把手、电源网线头、作案工具、手套上的微量接触性生物检材,在96孔过滤板上进行裂解后整体离心,分离载体与裂解液;应用自动化核酸提取纯化仪结合M48磁珠纯化试剂盒提取纯化DNA,采用IdentifilerPlus试剂盒进行扩增,3500XL测序仪电泳分型,ID-X专家系统分析结果。结果在553份检材中,成功获得STR分型的有271份,检验成功率在31.6%~97.3%之间,烟蒂、饮料瓶检材的成功率均在90%以上,提取纯化过程约90min。结论将96孔过滤板用于自动化工作站,可在实现批量接触性DNA的快速、自动化提取的同时,有效提高接触性DNA检出率。     

Use of a Spray Device to Locate Touch DNA on Casework Samples

The use of a fluorescent dye to visualize cellular material on surfaces offers a targeted sampling approach for locating touch DNA on casework items. However, the current application of such dye is not feasible for examination of relatively large items. As a result, development of an efficient dye application system is required to translate this approach into practice. Here, the spray pattern (area covered, intensity, and evenness) of 15 different commercial spray devices was examined visually using food coloring. From this, five devices were selected to apply Diamond Nucleic Acid Dye (DD) to three substrates (glass slide, plastic sheet, and brown packing tape) seeded with saliva and touch DNA. The cellular material was visualized using the Dino-lite Microscope and Polilight. The inhibitory effects of DD afforded by each spray device were examined using Identifiler Plus^® DNA profiling kit and a DNA input of 800 pg. The two most promising devices were further tested on a range of mock casework items seeded with touch DNA. The results presented demonstrate the feasibility of a spray system to apply DD to large surfaces and subsequently detect cellular material at both micro and macroscale. Specifically, the data suggest that a pressurized continuous-spray system is favorable and that droplet size influences the intensity of fluorescence and surface coverage. Furthermore, this study indicates that full STR profiles can be obtained following spraying with DD solution, even with excessive application, which is essential for the widespread use of these devices in casework.