试论精神病鉴定的启动

精神病鉴定的启动权归属问题一直颇具争议,针对目前精神病鉴定启动程序的现状与问题,对国外相关法律制度进行考察与借鉴,不难发现,当事人启动模式在我国当前的司法环境中不适宜推行,会遇到某些难以逾越的现实障碍,其可行路径是在现有公检法机关启动的模式基础上稍加完善,适当限制公检法机关启动精神病鉴定的自由裁量权,以保障当事人的合法权利.     

精神疾病重新鉴定分析

目的探索精神疾病司法鉴定中重新鉴定的相关问题,为提高鉴定质量提出一定建议。方法对司法部司法鉴定中心2001度进行的精神疾病司法鉴定重新鉴定案例进行回顾性统计分析,对重新鉴定的发生率、一致性等问题进行研究。结果重新鉴定的发生率为15.79%,一致性为42%,其中仅精神疾病诊断不一致者10例,仅法律相关问题评定不一致者12例,两者均不一致者18例。结论重新鉴定的一致性较差,需要进一步完善鉴定工作,提高鉴定质量。     

精神科医患法律关系初探

精神病人在病发时缺乏判断力,同时也会丧失自我控制力,住院治疗期间易发生自伤、自杀、伤人、外逃等状况,由此往往会导致一系列的医患纠纷。由于我国目前尚无针对精神病人的专项法律法规,导致人们对此类医患纠纷中具体法律责任问题的认定与解决莫衷一是。笔者试图分析精神病人住院期间与精神病院的医患法律关系、精神疾病治疗过程中涉及的精神病人的重要权利以及相关纠纷问题的法律责任,以期为我国未来的精神卫生立法提供参考。     

关于自杀的司法精神医学鉴定的若干问题

针对涉案自杀行为司法精神鉴定的必要性、操作要件及“标准”等问题,提出了自己的看法,并就各种涉案的自杀行为的责任能力鉴定进行简单的阐述。     

Market Darwinism vs. Market Creationism: Adaptability and Fairness in the Design of Greenhouse Gas Trading Mechanisms

International rule-making and compliance routines with respect to the Kyoto Protocol are evolving rapidly. This paper examines potential designs of emissions-trading programs by comparing the emissions credit trading (ECT) and cap-and-trade models for achieving cost-effective reductions in atmospheric greenhouse-gas (GHG) loading in terms of their adaptability and fairness. Adaptability is a valuable attribute when markets and their governing institutions are evolving rapidly or when regulated entities do not yet have well-established and predictable compliance routines. Fairness in both procedures and outcomes is central to efforts to establish and maintain institutions of international governance. The key difference concerns the awarding of tradable emission rights, which occurs at the launch of a cap-and-trade program but following when firms reduce emissions below baselines in an ECT scheme. Implications of this difference are explored in terms of institutional adaptability and fairness during program-design stages. By not locking in emission rights at the outset, and by being amenable to incremental roll-out, ECT appears to have superior adaptive and fairness qualities during periods of rapid institutional evolution.     

质疑对犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定期间的规定

我国刑事诉讼法和相关解释将对犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定的期间不计入羁押期限,是值得商榷的。应该认识到犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定在性质上类似于羁押,在德国和我国台湾等国家和地区,其是鉴定留置的一种类型,法律对其规定严格的实施要件,以防止对相对人权利不当的干涉。我国应从人权保障出发,在刑事诉讼法修改时,重新定位对犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定,并完善相关制度设置。     

关于精神疾病司法鉴定执业规范的探讨

前言 司法部2007年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目：《精神疾病司法鉴定执业规定》在立项近一年之后拟出了初稿，近日在司法部司鉴局的指导下，在郑瞻培等司法精神病学专家和法学专家的帮助下，经过课题组成员数年的潜心研究和努力，经十余次征求专家意见和修改，形成了《精神疾病司法鉴定执业规定（草案）》，供业内专家共同探讨。     

关于进一步规范精神疾病司法鉴定执业活动的几点思考

精神疾病司法鉴定问题一直以来备受公众责难,处理不好将影响社会公共安全和秩序,并对精神疾病患者的合法权益造成损害。解决此问题的关键是要认清精神疾病司法鉴定的特点,进一步规范精神疾病司法鉴定的执业活动,并在此基础之上正确厘清审判职能与鉴定功能的关系,以确保精神疾病司法鉴定活动的顺利进行。     

脑震荡后综合征伤残评定研究进展

由于症状表现的主观性以及当前客观检查方法所能提供证据的匮乏,加之赔偿伴生的症状伪装和夸大等问题,脑震荡后综合征患者的伤残评定鉴定意见一致性不高.在人体损伤赔偿纠纷中,脑震荡后综合征患者的伤残评定成为法医精神病鉴定的争议点和难题.通过对脑震荡及相关术语变化、脑震荡后综合征的发生率、症状表现及诊断标准、脑震荡后综合征客观评...     

Psychiatric assessment after every six years of the TBS order in the Netherlands

Protecting the public from dangerous mentally ill offenders is an important issue in may countries. The UK, Scotland and Germany for example are looking for new ways to deal with this issue and some have looked at the Dutch system of first sending the offender to prison for a number of years and then for treatment to a secure clinical facility. Dutch law uses the term TBS: detention at the government's pleasure. Legal rights of the patient under the TBS-order are protected by regular evaluations to help the court determine if the patient still poses a danger to society. These evaluations take place every two years, at the end of each extension period. Every six years an extra assessment by independent experts is obligatory. In this same period other types of assessment occur too, such as for transferral to a long-stay unit. A complicated succession of experts may visit the patient, asking the same questions and using the same files, distracting his or her attention and motivation from the treatment process. This system is threatened by the qualitative and quantitative scarcity of properly qualified experts. Measures have been taken to counteract these difficulties, but will they suffice?     

"It's Darwinism – Survival of the Fittest:" How Markets and Reputations Shape the Ways in Which Plaintiffs' Lawyers Obtain Clients

The survival of a plaintiffs' lawyer's practice depends upon the generation of an ongoing flow of clients with injuries that the civil justice system will compensate adequately. If this requirement is not met, lawyers will leave this aspect of the legal market for more promising ones. If they do, legal services for injured people will be diminished as a result. In order to find out how this personal services legal market is defined and developed, we interviewed ninety‐five plaintiffs' lawyers in Texas. These lawyers use four major strategies to get clients: client referrals, lawyer referrals, direct marketing, and other referrals. What any particular lawyer does is shaped by the geographic market from which clients are drawn, and by the lawyer's reputation. Our findings provide fresh insights for the empirical literature on plaintiffs' lawyers, and they provide an empirical context for assessing the potential impact of changes in the civil justice system, like tort reform, on the ability of plaintiffs' lawyers to obtain clients.     

汉、藏、回族司法精神病鉴定对比分析

目的:汉、藏、回族存在文化和生活习俗的差异,本研究旨在探讨汉、藏、回族人群在司法精神病鉴定中的差异。方法:在本中心1982年至2004年接受的司法精神病案例中,选择其中汉、藏、回族案例进行回顾性分析。结果:三组均以男性为主,且藏、回族男性比例高于汉族:汉族以工人、农民为主,藏、回族绝大多数为农民,并且比例高于汉族,汉族除初中文化程度比例高于藏、回族外,其余文化程度无显著差异。暴力案比例藏族高于汉、回族,经济案比例回族高于汉、藏族,其它案件类型无显著差异。疾病诊断中汉族诊断为精神分裂症者为著,其构成比最高(21.3%);诊断为精神发育迟滞藏族最低,其构成比为10.0%;无精神病者中藏族比例最高。汉、藏、回族三组责任能力之间无显著差异。结论:本资料显示,司法精神病鉴定中,汉、藏、回族其一般人口学特征、案件类型、案件特征、疾病种类等方面存在有一定的差异。     

制订《精神疾病司法鉴定执业规定（草案）》的重要意义

目前在司法机关审理案件的过程中，精神疾病司法鉴定正愈益受到重视。同时社会各界也对此给予了较多的关注。本文就制订精神疾病司法鉴定执业规范的规定，对当前司法鉴定工作的重要指导作用及其意义。发表自己的见解。