Waiver of the psychotherapist-patient privilege: implications for child custody litigation

The psychotherapist-patient privilege, rooted in both common and statutory law, is predicated upon the public policy goal of protecting the reasonable expectation of privacy of individuals seeking psychotherapy. The privilege is not absolute, however. State and federal courts are far from uniform in determining how and when the privilege should be waived, in whole or in part, through implication, inadvertence or the affirmative action of the parties. In the family law context, the law that has evolved around the exercise of this privilege is even more complex as the needs of children add another wrinkle to the goal of balancing the imperative of confidentiality with the need for useful information that may be provided.     

Options of litigation funding in serving the interests of society: a critical evaluation from the viewpoint of access to justice

Litigation funding, over the years, has run reverse from champerty and maintenance and been established as an integral part of mainstream civil justice system with a view to facilitating access to justice. Admittedly, its present standard in the United Kingdom has been impacting considerably on the objective of ensuring access to justice. But how far are the funding options serving the interests of the society is still a matter of debate. In this study, some hypotheses have been drawn to assess how far the options of litigation funding are facilitating the litigants’ satisfaction as to access to justice.     

Employee rights to privacy and access to personnel records: a new look.

Do employees really enjoy a so-called right to privacy in their employment relationship? To what extent are their rights violated by the pre-employment screening process? These are the questions discussed in this article by David F. Linowes, Boeschenstein Professor of Political Economy and Public Policy and Science at the University of Illinois and recently chairman of the Privacy Protection Study Commission. Citing the availability of data to a prospective employer through credit card companies, banks, insurance companies, mailing lists, health records, and investigative reporting agencies, Professor Linowes makes the point that little is left unknoun when the investigative process is completed. There is no clear line separating what is relevant and what is privileged. The Study Commission's report to Congress suggests guidelines that would insure fairness to all parties.     

Medicare program: access to books, documents, and records of subcontractors--Health Care Financing Administration

These regulations implement section 952 of the Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-499), which conditions Medicare reimbursement for the cost of services performed under certain contracts upon compliance with prescribed criteria. If a contract between a provider and a subcontractor covers services valued at or costing $10,000 or more over a 12-month period, Medicare reimbursement cannot be made for the services unless the contract includes a clause allowing the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Comptroller General access to the contract and to the subcontractor's books, documents, and records necessary to verify the costs of the contract. The clause in the contract must also permit similar access top any subcontract between the subcontractor and a related organization of the subcontractor when the subcontract is worth or costs $10,000 or more over a 12-month period. These regulations specify the criteria and procedures that the Department will use to obtain access to affected books, documents, and records. The purpose of the legislation and these proposed regulations is to permit the Secretary and Comptroller General to make an accurate determination of the reasonable costs under these contracts.     

网络安全立法的探讨

伴随着国内网络建设高潮的到来 ,网络已逐渐成为计算机犯罪的最主要犯罪工具 ,有效防止网络犯罪是法制化的必然。