科技型中小企业知识产权质押融资问题研究

科技型中小企业对我国国民经济的发展发挥着重要作用,但科技型中小企业有形资产少,普遍存在着融资难的问题。本文通过对我国科技型中小企业知识产权质押融资存在问题的分析,提出完善科技型中小企业知识产权质押融资的发展建议,以促进科技型中小企业的快速发展,推动创新型国家的建设。     

上海知识产权质押融资探索之路:试点先行,以点带面

金融之乡,企业温床--上海,这座城市当前正处于经济转型时期,自主创新能力逐渐加强,经济增长方式正在转变,科技型企业纷纷成立,逐步将科技成果转化为经济增长动力.     

北京:政府资金引导知识产权质押融资体系的建立与发展

2010年9月9日,"国家知识产权局知识产权投融资服务试点"在中关村正式签约启动,这是国家知识产权局创建知识产权投融资服务试点工作的第一站.中关村,这个北京创新型科技企业最为集中的地方,作为一个以知识产权为核心竞争力和第一生产要素的产业集中地,已经成为国家自主创新示范区,同时也是国家知识产权制度示范园区.     

政府动态

国务院发布多项知识产权措施促进中小企业发展9月22日,国务院公布《关于进一步促进中小企业发展的若干意见》(以下简称《意见》)提出了采取知识产权质押等方式缓解中小企业贷款抵质押不足的矛盾、加快中小企业     

知识产权质押融资中政府支持政策的实施和完善

现行各地知识产权融资贴息、风险补偿等财政支持政策的设置和实施呈现出政策目标单一、支持标准和力度不一、资金保障和政策可持久性不足,法律效力不足、政策支持前景不甚明朗等问题。政府应以政策性融资为主,建立长期稳健的中小企业知识产权融资的政策支持机制,在省一级层次上实现政策支持的统一是必要和可行的。     

法治与政策动向

最高院公布民事案件诉讼时效新制度，北京市海淀区推行知识产权质押贷款贴息政策，日本将对购买家用燃料电池予以补助。     

法治与政策动向

最高院公布民事案件诉讼时效新制度最高人民法院近日公布《关于审理民事案件适用诉讼时效制度若干问题的规定》,并于9月1日起开始实施。该司法解释规定,当事人可以对债权请求权提出诉讼时效抗辩,但对四类债权请求权提出诉讼时效抗辩的,人     

刍议文化产业的知识产权质押融资——兼评律师在知识产权质押业务中的作用

文化产业的投资结构与融资渠道决定着文化产业发展的方向和程度,中国文化产业要实现快速发展,就必须充分运用各种可行的新型融资方式。知识产权质押贷款诞生以来,为文化创意产业的融资带来一股新风。然而,知识产权质押贷款的发展前景真的如此令人乐观吗?现实并非如此。实际上除了实力很强的大型文化集团或者是国际、国内知名的导演偶尔能得到银行的青睐,中小型文化企业由于自有资金不足、缺乏不动产质押物等自身限制因素,基本上很难申请到银行的贷款。由于法律     

知识产权质押融资发展迅猛

正2013年7月30日,北京银行与普天信息技术研究院有限公司共同签署了知识产权融资服务合作协议,普天研究院将以专利权作为抵押,一次性从北京银行获得2亿元的贷款融资,一举刷新了迄今为止北京市单笔专利权质押融资的最高放贷额度。知识产权质押融资对于具有较高资金需求的高新企业,一直是颇具诱惑力的一种融资工具,也是顺应了国家金融政策导向的一种融资方式。尽管模式很美     

知识产权质押融资：路在何方——为专利权质押正名

知识产权质押融资，一个不是很新的概念。在走过几年之后，质押融资究竟面临怎样的现实、机遇和困境？本刊编辑部从这一期开始，将推出《知识产权质押融资：路在何方》系列专题，探究质押融资这些年来的得失。同时工信部电子知识产权中心和本刊将于近期举办质押融资的专题研讨会，为促进质押融资和中小企业的发展出谋划策，详情请关注本刊近期专题。     

国家创新系统中知识产权战略作用机制研究

实施国家知识产权战略,是建设创新型国家、提升综合国力的战略性选择。通过梳理国家创新系统、知识产权战略内涵相关文献,阐释知识产权战略在国家创新系统中的重要地位,并从驱动技术创新、促进产业创新和改善创新环境三方面着重分析知识产权战略的作用机制,探讨完善知识产权作用机制的对策。     

创新战略：企业知识产权与品牌战略

前言21世纪头20年,在世界多极化、经济全球化和新科技革命的背景下,我国在剧烈的经济竞争中,迎来重要的战略机遇期。站在竞争最前线的是企业,决定竞争胜负的是企业的核心竞争力。而企业核心竞争力的决定性因素是自主创新能力。我国企业改革和发展已经取得巨大进展,不少行业和企业依靠自主创新,不断拓展和赢得广阔的发展空间,有的已在国际市场崭露头角。但是,面对大举进入中国市场的跨国公司和外国强势企业集团,我国企业创新能力面临严峻挑战:一是经济实力与跨国公司不在一个档次,无法通过规模经营,兼并科技型企业,在世界范围内实现生产要素…     

国家利益的层次分析与国家在国际法上的行动选择

跟一切利益一样,国家利益具有鲜明的层次性。居于不同层次的国家利益,对于国家的重要性来说也就存在区别,这种区别必然影响国家利益与相关国际法律制度的关系。实际上,无论是国家利益的层次等级,还是国家利益的层次变动,乃至国家利益不同层次之间的复杂关系,都将影响国家在国际法上的态度与行动选择。无疑,对国家利益的层次分析,将是国家利益与国际法的关系研究中不可或缺的一环,也是我们从单位层次观察国内系统如何自下而上或从内至外影响国际法的一个良好窗口。     

Aligning National Bank Priorities with the Public Interest: National Benefit Banks and a New Stakeholder Approach

Banks have particular characteristics that set them apart from other business entities, including being more highly leveraged, benefiting from government safety nets, and generating massive negative externalities when they fail. These attributes mean that in addition to shareholder interests, bank directors should be allowed to carefully consider the interests of nonshareholders, such as creditors, taxpayers, and the overall economy, when making decisions. While directors of banks in states that have enacted constituency statutes may be allowed to consider nonshareholder interests, no federal act expressly allows directors of federally chartered banks to consider such interests. Moreover, to date, thirty‐seven states have enacted legislation to allow for the formation of public benefit corporations that require directors to consider the interests of nonshareholders. No federal law provides a clear path for federally chartered banks to do this. This article proposes dual federal legislation that would (1) enable directors of all federally chartered banks to expressly consider nonshareholder constituents when making decisions and (2) allow for the formation of national benefit banks that would require directors to consider nonshareholder interests in their decision‐making.     

Return on Investment in Innovation: Implications for Institutions and National Agencies*

Commercial success in universities in the USA and Canada has resulted in many other countries taking steps to emulate this performance and major technology transfer and commercialisation support programmes have been launched in UK, Europe, Australia, Japan and many other countries—including South Africa. Unrealistic expectations have, however, been generated by the spectacular successes of a relatively few institutions and it is not always realised that the success from commercialisation is proportional to the magnitude of the investment in research. Without a well funded, high quality research system, it is not possible for technology transfer to make any significant contribution to economic development. The possible economic returns to higher education institutions from commercialisation of research can be estimated using international benchmarks. This forecast uses a combination of an institutional return on investment model and a simple economic projection. The model is generic and can be adapted for use in any institution. As more data becomes available from local (and international) sources, the model will be refined to give better estimates. The model is dynamic and shows, quantitatively, why it can take up to 10 years for an institution, and 20 years nationally, to attain a positive rate of return from an investment in research and technology transfer. The model enables the long-term impact of policy decisions, in an institution and nationally, to be examined and alternative scenarios explored. The performance of individual institutions is, however, highly variable and unpredictable. This is even for those institutions that are comparable in size and maturity. A large portfolio of patents and licences is required to give a reasonable probability of positive returns. This may be possible at a national level, but is problematic in smaller institutions—and smaller countries. Because the benefits of the innovation system are captured largely at national level, with institutions having a high uncertainty, public sector support to reduce the institutional risk is necessary to assist institutions to make the necessary investments. Technology transfer is of course only one element of the overall research and innovation value chain. All elements must be functioning effectively to derive the economic and social benefits from research. In addition to a strong research system, adequate incentives must exist to encourage academics to participate, particularly with regard to the crucial initial step of invention disclosure. After disclosure, sufficient institutional capacity must be in place to take an idea, evaluate it, protect the intellectual property appropriately and then seek a path to commercialisation through either licensing or start-up company formation. *Based on the paper “Return on Investment in Innovation: Implications for Institutions and National Agencies” presented at The First Globelics Conference on Innovation Systems and Development Strategies for the Third Millennium, Rio de Janeiro, November 2003.     

略论国家知识产权战略的基本内涵及其实现途径

在知识经济化、经济全球化和经贸规则国际化的背景下,我国必须从战略的高度,调整和制定新的发展战略——国家知识产权富民强国战略,实施国家知识产权富民强国战略主要通过制度创新和市场机制,优化配置有限的创新资源,在培育知识产权文化的基础上,通过自主创新成果的产权化、知识产权的产业化和市场竞争的优势化,实现建设创新型国家与我国经济和社会发展的中长期目标。     

国家专利发展战略概念辨析

一、问题的提出国务院总理、国家科技教育领导小组组长朱镕基日前在中南海主持召开国家科技教育领导小组第十次会议上强调①,随着WTO《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》的实施,要积极实施专利战略,加快专利审批速度,通过提高我国原始性发明专利的数量和质量,增强我国科技、经济的竞争能力。要强化知识产权管理,抓紧研究制订具体政策和工作方案,提高我国自主知识产权的竞争力。由此可见,专利战略已经上升为国家经济、科技发展战略的高度,而且已经成为我国迎接“入世”挑战的主体应对策略之一。因此,明晰国家专利发展战略的概念及其相关问题,是实施国家专利发展战略的首要问题。     

知识产权战略当中的博弈

2005年7月1日,我国正式启动国家知识产权战略的制定工作。同年11月,《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划的建议》提出“建设刨新型国家”的宏伟目标,这个目标与国家知识产权战略的制定和实施是完全一致的。如何制定一个科学的国家知识产权战略的课题引人关注,笔者试对此问题进行探讨,