共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Anthony D. Woozley 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(1):41-47
George P. Fletcher, Rethinking Criminal Law Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1978, xviii + 898 pp. 相似文献
2.
Barbara Baum Levenbook 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):60-64
Hyman Gross, A Theory of Criminal Justice New York: Oxford University Press, 1979, xviii + 521 pp. 相似文献
3.
Douglas N. Husak 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):58-67
George P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, xi + 223 pp. 相似文献
4.
Andrew von Hirsch 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):88-94
A. W. Brian Simpson, Cannibalism and the Common Law Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984 相似文献
5.
Jerome Neu 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):62-67
Norval Morris, Madness and the Criminal Law Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982, 235 pp. 相似文献
6.
Dirk Van Zyl Smit 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):37-51
Elizabeth Wolgast, Ethics of an Artificial Person: Lost Responsibility in Professions and Organizations Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992, 161 pp. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Joan Ginter 《Criminal Law Forum》1993,4(2):419-423
M.A., University of Tartu 1979; Ph.D., All-Union Institute of Criminology (Moscow) 1986; LL.M., Columbia University 1993. 相似文献
12.
13.
M.B.E. Smith 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):85-97
Judith Jarvis Thomson, The Realm Of Rights Harvard University Press, 1990, viii, 383pp 相似文献
14.
Ernest J. Weinrib 《Law and Philosophy》1983,2(1):37-62
This paper explores how the widely acknowledged conception of tort law as corrective justice is to be applied to the law of negligence. Corrective justice is an ordering of transactions between two parties which restores them to an antecedent equality. It is thus incompatible with the comprehensive aggregation of utilitarianism, and it stands in easy harmony with Kantian moral notions. This conception of negligence law excludes both maximizing theories, such as Holmes' and Posner's, and Fried's risk pool, which combines Kantianism with distributive rather than corrective justice. Central to the Kantian approach is the impermissibility of self-preference. The two types of self-preference, self-preference in conception and self-preference in action can respectively account for the objective standard and the Learned Hand test, which are the two most characteristic features of negligence and which are generally (and wrongly) considered to be inescapably aggregative. This corrective justice conception of the negligence standard can then be compared to Epstein's corrective justice conception of strict liability, and arguments can be offered in favour of the superiority of the former. 相似文献
15.
R. A. Duff 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):51-63
Jeffrie G Murphy & Jean Hampton, Forgiveness and Mercy Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 194 pp. Kathleen Dean Moore, Pardons: Justice, Mercy, and the Public Interest New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, 271 pp. 相似文献
16.
17.
M.B.E. Smith 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(1):75-85
Lloyd Weinreb, Oedipus at Fenway Park: What Rights There Are and Why There Are Any Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994, viii, 221 pp. 相似文献
18.
Diane M. Hartmus 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(2):47-54
Larry W. Yackle, Reform and Regret: The Story of Federal Judicial Involvement in the Alabama Prison System New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, xii+322 pp. 相似文献
19.
Norman L. Cantor 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(1):71-77
Carlos F. Gomez, Regulating Death New Yorrk: Free Press, 1991, xx +172 pp. 相似文献
20.
Stephen Wizner 《Criminal justice ethics》2013,32(1):55-59
Peter S. Prescott, The Child Savers New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1981, 244 pp. 相似文献