日常生活的悲剧与解救——论《红楼梦》的悲剧主题

<红楼梦>的悲剧是一种日常生活的悲剧.其悲剧的根源在于日常生活总是遵循一般行为图式的安排,从而与个体的生活欲求形成抵触.这一悲剧存在于各个时代的世情小说中,具有普世性,其结果是造成常人作为生活主体.<红楼梦>展示了这种悲剧,同时为悲剧的解除提供了解答.这一解答对于今天现代化进程中的日常生活审美重建,仍然具有积极的启发意义.     

The Value of Art and Culture in Everyday Life: Towards an Expressive Cultural Democracy

ABSTRACT

Ever since the earliest forms of mass media, the dichotomy of mass culture/high culture has been a topic of debate. The concept of cultural democracy has developed as a way to acknowledge a variety of cultural activities. Despite attempts to develop a broader understanding of culture, cultural policy still seems to reproduce the dichotomies, and to value one over the other. In this article, we would argue for an expanded understanding of cultural democracy, which may serve as a starting point for a turn of perspective of arts advocacy and cultural policy—the perspective we call an expressive cultural democracy.     

宪法学的知识转型与方法综合——以20世纪90年代以来的学术争论为素材

20世纪90年代以来,是中国宪法学理论体系和研究范式急速发展与嬗变的历史时期,频繁而热烈的学术争论是其显著标志。基于宪法学本体论、知识论和方法论三个维度的学术史考察发现,这20年的宪法学研究呈现出一条以"反思与重述"为基本特征的学术演进脉络,以及研讨主题和范式的两次转换与嬗变。面对持续的社会转型与国家制度建设,中国宪法学需要立足宪法文本和宪政实践来寻求新的共识,发展出一种能够解释中国问题,弥合事实和规范之间缝隙,指引中国宪政建设的知识体系与研究方法。     

学术与事功平衡——郭秉文高等教育思想蠡测

郭秉文是获得教育学博士学位的中国第一人.他所提出的"四个平衡"广为人知.作为郭秉文大学管理思想的一部分,他所践行的"学术与事功的平衡"堪称是其"第五个平衡"."所学者皆有所用,所用者皆本所学",学以致用、学用一致、用其所学,鼎足而三支撑起第五个平衡.有一种现象既是学术与事功平衡的题中应有之意,又是这一平衡的升华与超越,那就是引领.而引领似可说是与教学、科研、服务等量齐观的高等教育的"第四职能".     

对中国民法学学术路向的初步思考——过分侧重制度性研究的缺陷及其克服

我国以往的民法学研究,呈现出的特点之一就是过分侧重制度性研究。这一研究模式有其存在的必要性,同时也存在一定的缺陷。未来的制度性研究应当是采用了体系化思考方法的制度性研究,应当是面向其他学科的研究方法和研究成果开放的制度性研究,而非单纯采用法律的逻辑分析方法的制度性研究。     

The consequences of respondent attrition in panel studies: A simulation based on the Rochester youth development study

Subject attrition is a potentially serious threat to the validity of inferences drawn from panel studies of delinquency and drug use. Prior assessments of this issue produce somewhat conflicting results, with some finding that respondents who leave the panel have higher rates of delinquency and drug use than those who remain, while other studies report little or no differential attrition. Despite these findings, there has been virtually no examination of the extent to which respondent attrition can bias substantive findings in panel studies of delinquency and drug use. The present article addresses this issue by simulating higher levels of attrition in an ongoing panel study that has a low rate of attrition and little differential attrition. It finds that failure to include more elusive respondents (those who are more mobile) would bias estimates of prevalence and frequency of delinquency and drug use as well as results from basic regression analyses. Failure to include less cooperative respondents (those who require more contacts) produces similar, but somewhat smaller, differences. The methodological implications of the results are discussed.