读者

本栏目发表读者对本刊的建议、对某篇文章的意见、对某种现象的观点或对某个问题的疑问……欢迎您的参与,精彩内容择优刊登。一经录用,赠法律图书一本。来信请留下联系电话。来信请寄:北京市丰台区莲花池西里甲7号法律出版社302室读者栏目收(100073)或发电子邮件至:cindyhzx007@163.com谁来为肆虐的毒气负责进入冬季以来,雾霾一直笼罩我国中东部地区,气象台已将霾预警升级为橙色。监测显示,2012年1月13日10时左右,北京地区的能见度在600米～800米,东部地区能见度更差,部分路段能见度小于500米。     

读者

本栏发表读者对本刊的建议、对某篇文章的意见、对某种现象的观点或对某个问题的疑问……欢迎来信,精彩内容,择优刊登,一经录用,赠法律图书一本。来信请寄:北京市丰台区莲花池西里甲7号法律出版社302室读者栏目收(100073)电子邮件:qingb02006@hotmail.com站起来的少年们就90后某少年在实习单位拒订盒饭事件,愚以为:一个不敢说对不起,我拒绝的民族是可悲的,一个把这当作一种耻辱的民族是没独立性的,一代敢于对权力说N0的少年则恰恰意味着这个民族从几十年的沉睡中开始渐渐醒来。     

读者

“幼小衔接班”火爆背后的忧思还有半个月的时间就要开学了,一批本该升入幼儿园大班的孩子提前结束了幼儿园生活,背着书包进入了幼小衔接班。月均2000多元的学费未能挡住家长追捧幼小衔接班的脚步。     

读者

本栏发表读者对某篇文章的意见、对某种现象的观点或对某个问题的疑问……欢迎来信,精彩内容,择优刊登。来信请寄:北京市丰台区莲花池西里甲 7 号法律出版社 302 室读者栏目收(100073)     

读者

本栏发表读者对本刊的建议、对某篇文章的意见、对某种现象的观点或对某个问题的疑问……欢迎来信,精彩内容,择优刊登,一经录用,赠法律图书一本。来信请寄:北京市丰台区莲花池西里甲7号法律出版社302室读者栏目收(100073)电子邮件:qingbo2006@hotmail.com警示牌不是挡箭牌     

To Our Readers

After sending this issue to the press, the editorial team passed a resolution to establish the journal Svobodnaia mysl'. The name Kommunist will appear on the cover one last time because, for technical reasons, it was printed in advance and could no longer be changed. We are not changing one word in the material in the issue, which was prepared earlier. In subsequent issues of the journal, we plan a serious discussion of what is taking place in the country. The editorial team asks the readers to support the theoretical and political journal Svobodnaia mysl', an open tribune of the left-wing democratic forces.     

法律的读者

法律一旦制定,并生效,则对其管辖内所有读者都具有一种强制阅读的力量。法律的读者如何阅读和解释法律,文章认为民众从行动中阅读和解释,法律家(法官、律师、检察官)从应用中阅读和解释,法学家从批判中阅读和解释。但人们在法律阅读中往往误解乃至曲解法律,其原因有三:1.法律文本的复杂性;2.法律阅读者的主观性;3.法律背景因素的遮蔽性。人们阅读法律只能尽量地减少误解和曲解,但不可能消灭对法律误解和曲解。     

作者·读者·编者——刊庆寄语精选

在《中国司法鉴定》创刊10周年之际,我们收到了主管部门,兄弟省市的司法鉴定协会和管理机构的领导,司法鉴定领域的专家、教授和学者,以及从事司法鉴定科学研究和实务界的朋友们撰写的许多寄语。这些来自四面八方的,洋溢着对《中国司法鉴定》关心、热诚和厚爱之情的寄语中,对进一步办好期刊提出了积极的建议,寄予了殷切的期望,表达了作者、读者与编者相携而行历程中的真情厚谊。对于不吝给予我们赐教,为《中国司法鉴定》刊庆而撰写寄语、感言,我们表示衷心的感谢!编辑部将分期遴选刊登。     

A Word to the Readers

Dear Comrades: These are difficult times—no doubt about it. They are difficult for everyday work and life, and tormenting for the mind, memory, and conscience. And they are extremely difficult for our journal as well. Like other Party publications, it too has been abandoned (of course not by us) to the caprice of fate. But it is not merely our fate or the fate of some other individual. It is essentially the fate of the entire Party. It is now obvious that the captains of this ship were the first to abandon it. Whatever ship it was, it was kept afloat thanks to millions of honest people, far from any center of power and the wielding of it, who believed in the ideals of social justice. Just yesterday they were needed, appeals were made for their help and support, but today they do not merit even parting words of appreciation and gratitude.     

读者与图书馆关系的法律适用分析

读者行使使用图书资料权时与图书馆结成的关系是管理与被管理、教育与被教育的关系。图书馆行使的管理权、教育权 是行政管理权,而不是民事权利。图书馆与读者的关系不是平等的民事法律关系,不是消费法所调整的法律关系。     

论明清时期读者与通俗小说评点的关系

明清时期,读者与通俗小说评点的关系相当密切。读者尤其是下层民众读者的介入推动了明清通俗小说评点的普及;在小说作者与读者之间,评点起到重要的沟通作用,为读者揭示了小说的创作主旨、人物塑造特点及小说文法;明清通俗小说评点中出现的假托风气也与读者关系紧密。可以说,读者是明清时期通俗小说评点形成与发展的重要推动力。     

2007年度《读者意见调查表》意见反馈综述

《中国司法》杂志于2007年第12期刊发了读者意见调查表之后，陆续收到了许多热心读者的反馈意见，对广大读者给予杂志的关心与爱护我们表示诚挚的谢意。此次参与填写调查意见表的读者有部机关的同志，有各省市司法厅（局）的干部，而更多的是来自基层的司法行政系统的一线干警。这些同志们对《中国司法》杂志寄予了深厚的期望，在充分肯定的前提下又提出了很多很好的意见和建议，对我们继续办好杂志具有积极的意义。现将读者们对2007年《中国司法》杂志的办刊意见和建议汇总分析如下：     

Judges as Readers,Authors and Dialecticians: Legal Interpretation in the EC<Emphasis Type="Italic">t</Emphasis>HR Cases on Mental Disability

The wording of major human rights texts—constitutions and international treaties—is very similar in those provisions, which guarantee everyone the right to family, privacy, protection against discrimination and arbitrary detention, and the right to access the court. However, judges of lower national courts, constitutional judges and judges of the European Court of Human Rights often read the same or seemingly the same texts differently. This difference in interpretation gives rise not only to disputes about the hierarchy of interpretative authorities, but to more general disputes about limits of judicial construction and validity of legal arguments. How it may happen, that the national courts, which apply constitutional provisions or provisions of national legislative acts, which are seemingly in compliance with the international human rights standards, come to different results with the international judges? Do they employ different interpretative techniques, share different values or develop different legal concepts? Do international judges ‘write’ rather than ‘read’ the text of the Convention? Who is, in Plato’s terms, a name-giver and who has a power to define the ‘correctness’ of names? The answers to these questions from the rhetorical and semiotic perspectives are exemplified by the texts of the judicial decisions on the rights of persons with mental disabilities.