中外走私犯罪立法比较分析

走私犯罪直接危及国家政治、经济安全,对国家危害极大,因此各国一般作为重大犯罪予以规定。走私犯罪立法的科学性对打击走私犯罪起到非常重要作用。我国目前对走私犯罪的立法还不完善,要通过研究国外走私犯罪的立法,借鉴其科学、先进的东西,促进我国走私犯罪立法的完善。     

广东黑社会问题再探：近年来广东反黑工作的回顾与思考

当前，黑社会性质犯罪已在广东省部分地区形成一定的势力，为非作恶、贻害一方，严重地扰乱了当地的社会管理秩序和危及了人民生命财产安全。针对日趋猖獗的黑社会性质犯罪，广东各级公安机关都将”打黑除恶”作为重要的日常业务工作来抓，坚持日常业务和专项行动相结合的反黑工作原则，从严从重、适时及时地打击黑恶犯罪。我们在查证黑社会性质组织时，应具体地内看其组织特征，外看其行为特征，在此基础上，抽象出其属性特征。     

试论反腐败中的洗钱控制

腐败和洗钱问题已成为当今世界的两大毒瘤，当腐败和洗钱相互勾结起来，给社会带来的破坏就更难防范和控制。必须控制洗钱打击腐败现象，促进控制洗钱和反腐败的机制的完善。     

《澳美自由贸易协定》对复制权保护的强化

背景:澳大利亚政府于2004年2月与美国政府就《澳大利亚--美国自由贸易协定》的文本达成了协定,该协定一经公布,在澳大利亚国内掀起了轩然大波。协定涉及的知识产权问题,更是引起了澳大利亚国内各界的强烈不满,民众普遍认为由此对知识产权保护的强化将会更多地保护美国大公司的利益,而压制了     

“关税—走私联动说”质疑──从走私涨消规律看转变海关工作方针的必然性

中国历史上曾数次出现过走私势头涨消的情况。有人因此提出“关税—走私联动说”,认为关税的高低是走私涨消的主要原因。作者对此提出质疑,认为走私涨消的关键在于“缉私效能”上。     

进一步完善上海关区“打防结合、重在防范”缉私机制的构想

针对当前走私态势的变化,上海关区缉私工作要以“打防结合、重在防范”为指导原则,既立足于打,又着眼于防,不断提升对走私活动的打击力和控制力,着力构筑关区内部(口岸海关、区域海关和职能部门)的防范联动机制,进一步完善缉私工作的社会综合治理、关区各条线管辖职能和缉私部门三个层面的防范责任机制。在思想业务素质、人力资源、人员培训等项工作上也要围绕和体现“重在防范”,改革和建立绩效考核综合评估机制,全面提升缉私工作水平。     

论海上抗拒缉私突发性事件的处置

广东边防总队在海上缉私工作中遇到的阻挠、围攻、抗拒缉私等突发事件,广东沿海海上抗拒缉私有四种类型。对处置此类海上突发性事件的应有五条措施:一是要制定成完善海上缉私工作预案和建全应急机制;二是要把握好处置突发事件的原则,防止矛盾激发;三是要充分发挥各级指挥中心建设作用,提高部队快速反应和协调作战能力;四是要充发发挥边防全线设防、联动配合的现役体制优势;五是要紧紧依靠地方党委政府和公安机关,加强与其他缉私、涉海职能部门的协作配合。     

The Struggle against Violations of Labor Law - One of the Most Important Tasks of the Courts

In the last several years, the Central Committee of the CPSU and the Soviet Government have carried out a number of exceedingly important measures to expand substantially the labor rights of workers and office employees. The working day has been reduced, the wages of the lower income brackets in both manual and white collar employment have been increased, and there has been an extension of pregnancy and postnatal leave. In addition, a number of legal measures have been adopted to expand socialist democracy and to reinforce the role and significance of the trade unions as schools of management, schools of communism.     

Exploitation in Human Trafficking and Smuggling

This article explores the mechanisms that underpin human smuggling and trafficking. It argues for the continued analytical relevance of the distinction between “trafficking” and “smuggling”, as posited by the 2000 UN Protocols. While this distinction has come under sustained criticism from several authors over the last 15 years, it nonetheless continues to capture the essential features of two distinct phenomena (control over a human being vs. illegal entry into a country), and acknowledges the role of agency in smuggling. The paper goes on to discuss three different scenarios that may emerge as a result of the interplay between smugglers and smuggled persons, and it specifies the role of exploitation in each scenario. In addition, the paper offers empirical evidence of the key building blocks of smuggling — namely the search for reliable information and the reaching of an agreement in regard to the service offered — and of how smuggling can turn into trafficking. This work concludes by drawing out the relevant policy implications.     

走私犯罪若干疑难问题研究

走私犯罪的主体身份、主观要件及走私犯罪与相关犯罪的区别问题,一直是刑法学研究的重点,走私犯罪中身份犯的认定、主观故意及走私犯罪的认定具有复杂性的特点,要具体问题具体分析.     

浅谈缉私案件中电子证据的提取与固定

电子证据的特殊性使其在刑事诉讼中占有重要地位,本文通过对海关缉私案件中电子证据提取与固定方面存在问题的分析,阐述了电子证据提取与固定的方法,以及应注意的问题。     

走私犯罪的立法现状与司法困境

从目前打击走私犯罪的司法实践来看,我国刑法关于走私犯罪的规定存在诸多不尽完善之处,表现为体例上的不统一、罪刑设置模式的不完善、刑罚配置的不均衡和犯罪构成设计上的疏漏.立法缺陷直接影响司法运作,导致违法不能究、有罪不能罚、罚无适当罪等现象的存在.因此,为避免司法解释越权,通过立法手段解决立法疏漏,促进司法有效运作,保证刑法功能的良好实现,已势在必然.     

近期涉外毒品走私犯罪案件审理情况分析

内容提要:今年1至5月份,上海市第一中级人民法院受理的涉外毒品走私案件数量骤增,这反映了该类毒品犯罪案件呈多发态势,给案件的审判工作带来一些新的难点。针对审判工作中出现的该情况,对近期一中院受理的走私毒品案件的特点、成因、审理中的问题进行分析,才能提出综合治理的相关对策,以确保案件审理的质量和效果,有效遏制该类案件的上升态势。     

正确认识当前海关缉私工作面临的八个关系，保持缉私工作持续发展

“科学发展观”是缉私工作在现代海关制度总体框架下的战略选择,要求缉私警察工作必须更全面、准确地把握快速通关与监管安全、税收任务与缉私责任、绩效意识与指标观念、专项行动与长效机制、打防结合与重打轻防、精品谋略与速战速决、人性执法与严格执法以及海关缉私与综合治理等八个相对关系,切实充分地发挥缉私整体效应,保持缉私工作的持续稳定发展。     

扫黑除恶中公安民警执法权威维护机制与对策

在扫黑除恶中对警察执法权威的维护是否得力,直接关系到国家法律的权威和国家稳定的底线。黑恶势力组织化程度提高,与公安机关的对抗性增强;侵害警察执法权威的暴力化、组织化增强,打击处理的难度加大;黑恶势力中高危人口构成社会安全的重大隐患;黑恶势力敌对心理、报复心理、侥幸心理较重。需要从反恐的视角处置黑恶势力暴力袭警,对暴力袭警行为实行零容忍;完善立法保障警察权威;建立完善维权机制,增加维权的厚度与宽度;健全完善黑恶势力暴力袭警案件的快速处置机制;强化管制刀具的管理;建立完善及时、规范的舆情引导管控机制;组织开展心理疏导和抚慰工作。     

Convict Criminology and the Struggle for Inclusion

Convict Criminology (CC) began in the early 1990s as a reaction to the then current state of academic criminology that did not adequately reflect the voices of convicted felons. Since its beginnings, CC has attempted to draw attention to a range of problems created by the criminal justice apparatus and defenders of the status quo. Dr. Joanne Belknap’s 2014 ASC presidential address and subsequent article presented an argument that stressed the importance of activism to be considered as part of criminological research. In the process, she reviewed her career and then criticized the field of Critical Criminology, in particular Convict Criminology. The article, however, ignored the numerous efforts that CC has engaged in to build an inclusive group school, movement, organization and network that includes the diverse voices of Ph.D. educated convicts and excons, and overall reflected a superficial understanding of the history and intent of Convict Criminology. This article attempts to explain the shortcomings of Belknap’s article and clarifies misunderstandings.