Attitudes of new entrants to the credit marketAttitudes of banks and new regulatory standardsDeveloping loan indices and service providersThe LCDS documentationMotivation of market participants   Callability/cancelabilityRestructuringReference ObligationDeliverable ObligationSubstitution of the Reference EntitySubstitution of the Reference Obligation or Deliverable ObligationSyndicated Secured Dispute Event and Syndicated Secured ResolutionSettlement    相似文献   

2.
The pan-European retail market are we there yet?     
Burn  Lachlan; Wells  Boyan 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(3):263-280
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • When the EU Prospectus Directive was introduced inlate 2003, there was great optimism that it would finally leadto the long awaited pan-EEA retail capital market.
  • This articleasks whether the Directive has achieved this result and looks,in particular, at the disclosure regime relating to the admissionof debt securities to EEA-regulated markets and the public offeringof such securities in the EEA.
  • A number of impediments to thecross-border retail market, that are completely separate fromdisclosure, are examined.
  • In conclusion, the article discusseswhether, in fact, expectations for the Prospectus Directivein this area were set too high and could never be met and looksat what more needs to be done in order to achieve the goal ofa single retail debt market in the EEA.
 
  The EU Prospectus Directive1 (the ‘PD’) was introducedin late 2003 amid a flurry of optimism and . . . [Full Text of this Article]       (a) Use of programmes(b) Derogation         Unfair contractsFinancial promotionAdvertising regime    相似文献   

3.
Hedge fund regulation, market discipline and the Hedge Fund Working Group     
McVea  Harry 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2009,4(1):63-84
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Against a general background of suspicion, criticismand even hostility, the recently formed Hedge Fund Working Group(HFWG), comprising 14 leading fund managers based mainly inthe United Kingdom, published their Final Report in January2008.
  • The Report is based on standards of best practice (the‘Standards’ of which there are 28) that are, inthe final analysis, to be administered by a newly establishedHedge Fund Standards Board (HFSB)—a self-regulatory bodycharged with the responsibility of keeping the Standards up-to-dateand ‘fit for purpose’.
  • Borrowing from both theFinancial Services Authority's Principles for Business, whichrepresent bold statements of good business practice within theUK's financial services sector, and the Combined Code on CorporateGovernance's voluntary approach of ‘comply or explain’,the Standards are heralded by the HFWG as ‘an exercisein market discipline, based on disclosure’.
  • The unprecedentednature of recent financial market . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                   相似文献   

4.
Lessons from Cukurova     
Benjamin  Joanna; Maher  Felicity 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(2):126-138
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The recent decision of the High Court of the BritishVirgin Islands in Alfa v Cukurova has caused a stir among lawyersserving the international financial markets based in London.
  • Thedecision concerns the meaning of ‘appropriation’.Appropriation is a new remedy for collateral takers introducedby the Financial Collateral Arrangements (No. 2) Regulations2003, which implement the Financial Collateral Directive.
  • Thedecision holds that effective appropriation requires the collateraltaker to take over from the collateral giver the ability todeal with the collateral as its own.
  • In Cukurova, where anequitable mortgage was taken over directly held shares, thisrequired that the collateral taker become the registered ownerof the shares.
  • The decision was appealed to the BVI Court ofAppeal in late January 2008 and may go further. In the meantime,this article provides an overview of the decision and considersits wider significance.
 
  . . . [Full Text of this Article]   The factsThe decisionThe ratioAppeals     Nature of security interestContrast title transfer collateral arrangementsMeaning of appropriationThe issue in the case          相似文献   

5.
Disclosure in the EEA securities markets--making sense of the puzzle     
Burn  Lachlan 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(2):139-153
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • This article looks at the various elements of thedisclosure regimes for issuers that are admitted to EEA-regulatedmarkets, including the initial requirement for the productionof a prospectus on admission and on-going requirements to discloseprice sensitive information as it arises and to make regularreports to the market.
  • After a brief analysis of some of thesimilarities and differences between the various regimes, thearticle makes an attempt to reconcile the differences by lookingat each regime in the context of the others and viewing themas a continuum.
  • Finally, remaining problems concerning multi-jurisdictionliability for disclosure in the EEA and potential liabilityfor forward-looking disclosure are discussed.
 
  With a sly dig at the abusive market practices of his time,Oscar Wilde wrote that ‘private information is practicallythe source of every large modern fortune’.1 For some,it still is, despite the efforts of legislators and . . . [Full Text of this Article]     PurposeRetrospective disclosureDisclosure of future events   Improving the quality of disclosureAvoidance of time-wastingAvoidance of vexatious litigation   Sensible liability regimeSensible interpretation   Multi-jurisdiction liabilityForward-looking disclosure—foresight, hindsight and second sight    相似文献   

6.
Complex financial histories--a problem solved?     
Desmond  Kevin 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(1):79-87
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Recognizing the importance of ensuring that the financialhistory presented in a prospectus appropriately reflects thesubstance of an issuer's operations, the European Commissionhas brought forward an amendment to the Prospectus Directiveimplementing Regulation (809/2004) which will take effect fromJanuary 2007. The new law defines two new terms, namely a ‘complexfinancial history’ and a ‘significant financialcommitment’, which if applicable will require an issuerto consider including additional historical financial informationto that of its own.
  • Following the Committee of European SecuritiesRegulators' advice on this subject, as well as the views ofmarket participants, the new law does not prescribe the financialreporting solutions to be followed. Rather, it sets out theprinciples to be applied and then allows competent authoritiesflexibility to accommodate solutions that reflect the particularcircumstances of an issuer. Notably, the competent authoritiesare required to take into account the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                   相似文献   

7.
Emissions trading in the European Union     
Roberts  Rhian; Staples  Chris 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):5-17
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The EU ETS will undergo a number of changes consequentupon the commencement of the first Kyoto Commitment Period on1 January 2008.
  • This article considers the existing EU ETSframework and also the key developments that are anticipatedin the European emissions market for 2008–2012.
  • A secondarymarket for trading EUAs has already developed and this market,together with the standard-form documentation used, is discussed.
  • Inconclusion, the article questions the future of emissions tradingin Europe—particularly after the current Kyoto targetsexpire in 2012.
  European businesses entered a carbon-constrained economic environmenton 1 January 2005. For some, the impacts were immediate anddirect in the form of caps on their emissions. The majorityfelt it indirectly and more slowly through increased energycosts as the perceived cost of compliance was passed on by generators.The full impacts are not yet clear, but a quiet revolution is. . . [Full Text of this Article]
                  CDM projectsJI projects                      相似文献   

8.
Retail cascading in Germany a model for a revision of the PD?     
Schneider  Hannes; Haag  Hendrik 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):370-380
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The EU Prospectus Directive (the ‘PD’),as implemented in several EEA member states, including the UnitedKingdom, and the Regulation accompanying the PD (the ‘Regulation’)render difficult or even inhibit public offers of debt securitiesto retail investors.
  • Market participants and their advisors,trade associations such as the International Capital MarketAssociation (‘ICMA’), as well as the United KingdomListing Authority (‘UKLA’) and the Committee ofEuropean Securities Regulators (‘CESR’) have beendealing with the issues. UKLA and ICMA have come forward byproposing a solution regarding the information requirementsof Annex V.5 of the Regulation. The proposal is to utilize Article23.4 of the Regulation allowing information required by theRegulation to be omitted if the information is not pertinentto the offer. CESR may take a wider approach. It has indicatedits willingness to assess whether further Level 2 work is appropriateand legislative action will . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
        The legislative history of Section 3 (1) WpPGNon-conforming transposition?DiscussionValidity of prospectus, supplements to the prospectus and publication of inside informationProspectus liabilityAnnex V.5 of the RegulationDebt issuance programmes in particular    相似文献   

9.
Construction of contracts and the role of 'entire agreement' clauses     
McMeel  Gerard 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):58-78
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The construction of commercial contracts has seena shift from a strict to a liberal philosophy of constructionand this has had an impact on commercial agreements and actors.
  • Thereis an ongoing debate concerning the widening background or matrixevidence to include prior negotiations, reflecting the desireof parties to insulate commercial agreements from collateralterm arguments or other recourse to wider materials.
  • This hasin part led to the emergence of ‘entire agreement’and ‘non-reliance’ clauses.
  • This article considersthe construction of such clauses and whether such clauses takeeffect through construction or estoppel reasoning. It also looksat the merits of estoppel by representation and ‘estoppelby contract’, the impact of Unfair Contract Terms Act1977 and Misrepresentation Act 1967, and the effect of waiverof clause.
  The law of contract is fundamental to all markets, and participantsin wholesale markets are wedded to the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
      What does an ‘entire agreement’ clause look like?The issues         The Misrepresentation Act  相似文献   

10.
The evolution of regulatory enforcement action in the UK capital markets: a case of 'less is more'?     
MacNeil  Iain 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):345-369
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Formal enforcement action is a relatively rare occurrencewithin the UK capital markets regulatory framework. This characteristicdistinguishes the UK from the US, where there is a more intensefocus on enforcement, both public and private.
  • Several featuresof the UK regulatory system contribute towards a low incidenceof enforcement. Some of these features are embedded in the statutoryframework, but the FSA has played a key role in the developmentof enforcement policy, while the continuing presence of self-regulationin the form of the Combined Code has also played a part.
  • Thefocus on risk-based regulation in the UK has been a major influencefor enforcement policy. The move to more principles-based regulationhas also been a factor but one that is more difficult to interpret.If it is correct to assume that principles-based regulationdoes not affect the intensity of regulation, then the effecton the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
      The move towards more principles-based regulationThe enforcement implications of principles-based regulation       Public enforcementPrivate enforcement   Sanctions: the statutory optionsSettlements: process and incentivesProcedural complications      相似文献   

11.
Deregistration issues in the US for foreign private issuers     
Greene  Edward F.; Underhill  Robert 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(2):115-132
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • While the passage of Sarbanes–Oxley in the USwas just one of the many causes for the lack of competitivenessof the US capital markets recently, it served to focus the attentionof foreign private issuers in the US on the difficulty and sometimesimpossibility of exiting the US capital markets.
  • Unlike manyother jurisdictions, the process of deregistering in the USis distinct from process of delisting. The current rules forderegistration of foreign private issuers focus on the numberof US shareholders, regardless of how or where those shareholderspurchased their shares. In addition, foreign private issuers,were subject to complicated rules for counting US shareholders,and deregistration often would only suspend (not terminate)their reporting obligations.
  • As a result of pressure from foreignprivate issuers, the SEC proposed new rules at the end of 2005to liberalize the existing deregistration regime for foreignprivate issuers. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
      Delisting and deregistration in the USDelisting and deregistration in EU   Deregistration of equity securitiesDeregistration of debt securitiesRules for counting shareholders        相似文献   

12.
Private equity: the UK regulatory response     
MacNeil  Iain 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):18-31
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Rapid growth in private equity in recent years hasgenerated a public debate over the possibility of regulation.The Financial Services Authority (FSA), British Venture CapitalAssociation (BVCA), Treasury and the Treasury Select Committeehave all been active on this front in recent months.
  • This briefingnote provides an overview of the current state of play in theUK, taking account of the final guidelines published by SirDavid Walker and the changes to capital gains tax that havebeen announced by the Treasury.
  • The BVCA guidelines will bringwithin its enhanced disclosure regime around 65 portfolio companiesand will operate on a ‘comply or explain’ basis.
  • TheFSA has indicated that it will focus on the risks of marketabuse and conflicts of interest arising from private equitytransactions, but it does not envisage a discrete regulatoryregime for the sector.
 
  The rapid growth in private equity . . . [Full Text of this Article]              相似文献   

13.
Foreign trading screens in the United States     
Jackson  Howell E.; Fleckner  Andreas M.; Gurevich  Mark 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2006,1(1):54-76
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Remote trading screens allow investors to trade onexchanges located in other jurisdictions. The Securities andExchange Commission (‘SEC’) has generally prohibitedthe placement of foreign trading screens in the United Statesunless the associated exchange complies with US regulatory requirements.While the SEC defends its position as an essential investorprotection, European officials complain that SEC requirementsconstitute an unfair barrier to trade.
  • This article arguesthat technological advances have largely mooted this contro-versy.Current requirements do not protect US investors as much asthe SEC claims nor do they inhibit competition as much as theSEC's critics assert.
  • To the extent that alternative tradingmechanisms already give US investors de facto access to unregulatedforeign exchanges, the SEC may well choose to revisit its positionon foreign trading screens, particularly as US and Europeanfinancial markets become more integrated and disclosure requirementson both sides of . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
    The US viewRegulation of stock exchangesRegulation of Alternative Trading SystemsRegulation of foreign marketsThe Tradepoint releaseThe Commodity futures trading commission's approach       Public statementsUS concernsEuropean interests   Order routing channels
  首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The market for Loan Only Credit Default Swaps (LCDS)is expected to develop rapidly, but the market documentationfor this product is proving to be a difficult issue as a resultof differing views by users of the product and divergent approachesbetween the US and European markets.
  • The International Swapsand Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) has, on 4 May 2007,released a long-awaited revised draft of the European LCDS.The finalization of this draft is not far off, but certain importantissues are yet to be finalized.
  • Rather than speculate on theoutcome of such discussions, this article looks at the developmentof the European LCDS market, the motivation and needs of itsparticipants and takes stock of the European documentation beforeit underwent the recent almost year-long consultation process.It therefore compares the European LCDS of May 2006 againstthe US LCDS of June 2006 (ignoring . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
   1. Introduction    2. Growth in the underlying–syndicated secured loan market    3. Factors influencing the decision to hold physical or synthetic positions    4. Key documentation issues    5. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. The Prospectus Directive    3. Different implementation across the EEA    4. Mismatch between law and market practice—Retail cascades    5. Liability    6. Final terms or supplements?    7. Passporting    8. Impact of other laws    9. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. Disclosure (including ‘side letters’)    3. Valuation concerns    4. Risk management    5. Fund governance    6. Market abuse    7. Activism    8. An assessment    9. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. Overview of the case    3. Significance of the case    4. Nature of appropriation    5. Indirectly held securities    6. The Financial Collateral Directive regime    7. Interpretation of UK provisions implementing EU legislation    8. Doctrine versus pragmatism    1. Introduction    2. The pieces    3. Some analysis    4. Why does it matter?    5. Resolving the problem    6. Remaining problems    7. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. What is meant by a complex financial history?    3. A significant financial commitment    4. The test of significance    5. Deciding what to disclose    6. By way of illustration    7. Interaction with domestic requirements    8. When is a year not a year?    9. What issuers need to do?    1. Sector coverage    2. Allocation    3. Treatment of new entrants    4. Installation closure    5. Auctioning    6. Trading    7. The Kyoto Protocol    8. Linking to the Kyoto Mechanisms    9. Buying from clean development and joint implementation projects    10. The primary market    11. The secondary market    12. Existing documentation for trading EUAs    13. Deliverability issues for Kyoto Credits    14. Eligibility requirements for emissions trading    15. The International Transaction Log    16. Commitment period reserves    17. The impact on secondary trading documentation    18. The voluntary market for CERs    19. The future for emissions trading    1. Introduction    2. The regime preceding the PD: the Public Offer Directive    3. The Prospectus Directive    4. Retail cascades in Germany    5. A model for a revision of the PD?    1. The modern approach to contractual construction    2. ‘Wider still and wider’?: prior negotiations    3. ‘Entire agreement’ and ‘non-reliance’ clauses    4. Construction of entire agreement clauses    5. Waiver    6. Estoppel and non-reliance clauses    7. Statutory regulation    1. Introduction    2. Risk-based regulation    3. Principles-based regulation    4. Self-regulation and market discipline    5. The allocation of responsibility for regulatory contraventions    6. Public and private enforcement    7. Settlement and sanctions    8. Synthesis and speculation    9. Conclusions    1. Introduction    2. Importance of liberalizing the US deregistration rules    3. US and EU perspectives on deregistration    4. SEC's first proposal to amend the deregistration rules    5. Response to the first deregistration proposal    6. The Second Deregistration Proposal and The Final Deregistration Adoption    7. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. The regulatory debate    3. The FSA response––risk    4. The FSA response—regulation?    5. The industry response    6. The Treasury Select Committee Report    7. Conclusion    1. Introduction    2. US and EU perspectives on the regulation of foreign exchanges    The EU view    The Member State view    The US–EU conflict    3. Industry practices and the controversy over foreign trading screens