Attitudes of new entrants to the credit marketAttitudes of banks and new regulatory standardsDeveloping loan indices and service providersThe LCDS documentationMotivation of market participants   Callability/cancelabilityRestructuringReference ObligationDeliverable ObligationSubstitution of the Reference EntitySubstitution of the Reference Obligation or Deliverable ObligationSyndicated Secured Dispute Event and Syndicated Secured ResolutionSettlement    相似文献   

2.
  The Italian torpedo is dead: long live the Italian torpedo.A recently published decision of the Milan Court of First Instancenot only confirms that a cross-border claim for a declarationof non-infringement of a European patent is unlikely to succeedbefore an Italian court unless it is brought against an Italiandomiciled party, but also shows that the longstanding traditionof Italian torpedoes is not yet defunct, contrary to predictionsafter a landmark decision of the Italian Supreme Court in 2003.(p. 6) Wilfulness redefined: In re Seagate. In In re Seagate Tech.LLC, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit redefinedwilfulness relating to patent infringement, altered how wilfulnesswill be litigated,  相似文献   

3.
Emissions trading in the European Union     
Roberts  Rhian; Staples  Chris 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):5-17
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The EU ETS will undergo a number of changes consequentupon the commencement of the first Kyoto Commitment Period on1 January 2008.
  • This article considers the existing EU ETSframework and also the key developments that are anticipatedin the European emissions market for 2008–2012.
  • A secondarymarket for trading EUAs has already developed and this market,together with the standard-form documentation used, is discussed.
  • Inconclusion, the article questions the future of emissions tradingin Europe—particularly after the current Kyoto targetsexpire in 2012.
  European businesses entered a carbon-constrained economic environmenton 1 January 2005. For some, the impacts were immediate anddirect in the form of caps on their emissions. The majorityfelt it indirectly and more slowly through increased energycosts as the perceived cost of compliance was passed on by generators.The full impacts are not yet clear, but a quiet revolution is. . . [Full Text of this Article]
                  CDM projectsJI projects                      相似文献   

4.
Complex financial histories--a problem solved?     
Desmond  Kevin 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(1):79-87
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Recognizing the importance of ensuring that the financialhistory presented in a prospectus appropriately reflects thesubstance of an issuer's operations, the European Commissionhas brought forward an amendment to the Prospectus Directiveimplementing Regulation (809/2004) which will take effect fromJanuary 2007. The new law defines two new terms, namely a ‘complexfinancial history’ and a ‘significant financialcommitment’, which if applicable will require an issuerto consider including additional historical financial informationto that of its own.
  • Following the Committee of European SecuritiesRegulators' advice on this subject, as well as the views ofmarket participants, the new law does not prescribe the financialreporting solutions to be followed. Rather, it sets out theprinciples to be applied and then allows competent authoritiesflexibility to accommodate solutions that reflect the particularcircumstances of an issuer. Notably, the competent authoritiesare required to take into account the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                   相似文献   

5.
How to compare regulatory regimes     
Wood  Philip R. 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):332-344
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
It is the policy of this Journal to only publish material thathas not been published previously. However, an exception hasbeen made with this article as the work from which it has beendrawn has only recently published. This article is taken fromPhilip Wood's Regulation of International Finance, one of aseries of nine works by Philip Wood on the law of practice ofInternational Finance, published by Sweet & Maxwell in 2007.Philip Wood is a member of the Editorial Board of Capital MarketsLaw Journal. Many readers of Capital Markets Law Journal aroundthe world will not have had the chance to read this very topicalarticle which is of exceptional quality and Capital MarketsLaw Journal is very pleased to make it available to the widercapital markets community.                 TheEditors
Key points
  • This article examines the criteria which might usefullybe . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                Identity and independence of regulatorsCodification of the lawCriminalization of the lawXenophobia and protectionismDegree of investor protectionFreedom index      相似文献   

6.
Hedge fund regulation, market discipline and the Hedge Fund Working Group     
McVea  Harry 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2009,4(1):63-84
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Against a general background of suspicion, criticismand even hostility, the recently formed Hedge Fund Working Group(HFWG), comprising 14 leading fund managers based mainly inthe United Kingdom, published their Final Report in January2008.
  • The Report is based on standards of best practice (the‘Standards’ of which there are 28) that are, inthe final analysis, to be administered by a newly establishedHedge Fund Standards Board (HFSB)—a self-regulatory bodycharged with the responsibility of keeping the Standards up-to-dateand ‘fit for purpose’.
  • Borrowing from both theFinancial Services Authority's Principles for Business, whichrepresent bold statements of good business practice within theUK's financial services sector, and the Combined Code on CorporateGovernance's voluntary approach of ‘comply or explain’,the Standards are heralded by the HFWG as ‘an exercisein market discipline, based on disclosure’.
  • The unprecedentednature of recent financial market . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                   相似文献   

7.
Which law applies? A reply to Professor Torremans     
Johnson  Phillip 《Jnl of Intellectual Property Law & Pract》2005,1(1):71-76
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
‘A book may be good for nothing; or there may be onlyone thing in it worth knowing; are we to read it all through?’(Samuel Johnson) This section is dedicated to the review ofideas, articles, books, films and other media. It will includereplies (and rejoinders) to articles, the evaluation of newideas or proposals, and reviews of books and articles both directlyand indirectly related to intellectual property law.
In a recent article,1 Professor Torremans argues that the countryof origin (sometimes called the lex originis) should be thelaw applied to authorship and ownership of copyright.2 There is no doubt that several countries do apply the countryof origin to initial ownership and authorship of copyright works.Citing both the Austrian and Belgian Codes on Private InternationalLaw as examples,3 Professor Torremans also mentions the decisionof the US Second Circuit of Appeals in . . . [Full Text of this Article]
    Application to other countriesQualification        相似文献   

8.
  Steven L. Schwarcz Structured finance lawyers increasingly are being scrutinizedwhen companies fail, but there is confusion as to the standardsby which they should be judged. Society benefits where such lawyers are permitted to help facilitatematters in which neither the lawyer's actions nor the underlyingtransaction is, at the time, illegal as a matter of positivelaw. In these matters, the company's managers, not its structuredfinance counsel, should be responsible for ensuring that thecompany's investors are benefited, not harmed. This article focuses on the public responsibility of lawyerswho represent originators of structured finance transactions.It looks critically at the traditional view of such responsibilityand considers what it should be.   Simon Firth Credit derivatives  相似文献   

9.
Foreign trading screens in the United States     
Jackson  Howell E.; Fleckner  Andreas M.; Gurevich  Mark 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2006,1(1):54-76
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Remote trading screens allow investors to trade onexchanges located in other jurisdictions. The Securities andExchange Commission (‘SEC’) has generally prohibitedthe placement of foreign trading screens in the United Statesunless the associated exchange complies with US regulatory requirements.While the SEC defends its position as an essential investorprotection, European officials complain that SEC requirementsconstitute an unfair barrier to trade.
  • This article arguesthat technological advances have largely mooted this contro-versy.Current requirements do not protect US investors as much asthe SEC claims nor do they inhibit competition as much as theSEC's critics assert.
  • To the extent that alternative tradingmechanisms already give US investors de facto access to unregulatedforeign exchanges, the SEC may well choose to revisit its positionon foreign trading screens, particularly as US and Europeanfinancial markets become more integrated and disclosure requirementson both sides of . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
    The US viewRegulation of stock exchangesRegulation of Alternative Trading SystemsRegulation of foreign marketsThe Tradepoint releaseThe Commodity futures trading commission's approach       Public statementsUS concernsEuropean interests   Order routing channels
  首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The market for Loan Only Credit Default Swaps (LCDS)is expected to develop rapidly, but the market documentationfor this product is proving to be a difficult issue as a resultof differing views by users of the product and divergent approachesbetween the US and European markets.
  • The International Swapsand Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) has, on 4 May 2007,released a long-awaited revised draft of the European LCDS.The finalization of this draft is not far off, but certain importantissues are yet to be finalized.
  • Rather than speculate on theoutcome of such discussions, this article looks at the developmentof the European LCDS market, the motivation and needs of itsparticipants and takes stock of the European documentation beforeit underwent the recent almost year-long consultation process.It therefore compares the European LCDS of May 2006 againstthe US LCDS of June 2006 (ignoring . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
   1. Introduction    2. Growth in the underlying–syndicated secured loan market    3. Factors influencing the decision to hold physical or synthetic positions    4. Key documentation issues    5. Conclusion    Current intelligence    1. Sector coverage    2. Allocation    3. Treatment of new entrants    4. Installation closure    5. Auctioning    6. Trading    7. The Kyoto Protocol    8. Linking to the Kyoto Mechanisms    9. Buying from clean development and joint implementation projects    10. The primary market    11. The secondary market    12. Existing documentation for trading EUAs    13. Deliverability issues for Kyoto Credits    14. Eligibility requirements for emissions trading    15. The International Transaction Log    16. Commitment period reserves    17. The impact on secondary trading documentation    18. The voluntary market for CERs    19. The future for emissions trading    1. Introduction    2. What is meant by a complex financial history?    3. A significant financial commitment    4. The test of significance    5. Deciding what to disclose    6. By way of illustration    7. Interaction with domestic requirements    8. When is a year not a year?    9. What issuers need to do?    1. Jurisdictions of the world    2. Legal families for the purposes of financial law    3. Characteristics of measurement criteria    4. General financial law criteria    5. Application of general criteria to legal systems    6. Legal and political infrastructure as a criterion    7. Commonality of underlying regulatory law    8. Criteria for measuring regulatory law    9. Comparison of the US and the UK    10. Background influences on the regulatory regime    1. Introduction    2. Disclosure (including ‘side letters’)    3. Valuation concerns    4. Risk management    5. Fund governance    6. Market abuse    7. Activism    8. An assessment    9. Conclusion    1. The convention    2. The statute    3. Case law    4. Moral rights    5. Conclusion    The public responsibility of structured finance lawyers (see p. 6)    Self-referenced credit derivatives – are they enforceable under English law? (see p. 21)    1. Introduction    2. US and EU perspectives on the regulation of foreign exchanges    The EU view    The Member State view    The US–EU conflict    3. Industry practices and the controversy over foreign trading screens