垫付责任的立法选择研究

垫付责任是我国司法解释所创设的一种特殊的民事责任承担方式,属于他人责任,但并非替代责任。垫付责任不具有正当性,背离民事责任能力原理,不合公平观念,忽视社会保险等在侵权损害填补中的作用。现行的垫付责任存在责任主体不明以及责任期限、条件、范围不当等缺陷,引发适用上的困难。应当废除现行垫付责任之规定。     

试论现代国际法上的过失与国际责任

随着国际法不加禁止行为造成损害后果的国际责任制度的确立,过失责任原则作为国际责任的归责原则以及过失作为国际责任的构成要件开始受到理论界的质疑.本文全面阐述了国际法上的过失的内涵,系统地分析了过失与国际责任的构成、责任性质与责任程度的关系,认为过失是国际责任的构成要件,直接影响国际责任的形式、性质和程度,只是由于现代国际法上的过失与行为违背国际义务在概念上具有同一性,因此,没有必要将过失单列出来作为国际责任的构成要件.     

To Discipline and Publish: Scottsboro and Narratives of Delinquency

With the economics of racism of the 1930s and 1950s American South in mind, our essay explores the relationship between the act of writing and institutional penology. Taking an obscure, but visceral autobiographical account by Paterson and Conrad (Scottsboro Boy, Garden City Doubleday, 1950), we examine how discipline, punishment, and institutional identity emerge out of publishing, or, as Foucault put it, “the power of writing.” Narratives of delinquency born out of a racialized penal economy tend to resist attempts to tame the criminal, making institutional survival a productive discourse, and its articulation, a unique revolutionary act.

---

中学校园犯罪原因及预防机制研究——以广东地区部分中学为视角

青少年是祖国的未来，教育是关乎国家发展的百年大计，预防和减少未成年人犯罪是当今世界各国十分重视的重大社会问题。广东地处东南沿海，经济发达，比邻香港、澳门特区，与全国其他地方的中学校园犯罪相比而言表现出诸多不同特征，本文通过大量的社会调查与分析，提出了符合广东特色的中学校园犯罪预防机制，从而为我们预防、减少校园犯罪、构建和谐校园提供了可资借鉴的依据。     

略论构建我国未成年人犯罪暂缓起诉制度的必要性与可行性

暂缓起诉制度在降低司法机关的诉讼压力,提高诉讼效率,预防犯罪等方面具有较好的实践效果。从我国检察机关关于暂缓起诉相关制度的实践状况及未成年人的身心特点而言,构建我国未成年人犯罪暂缓起诉制度既具必要性又具可行性。我国引入暂缓起诉制度,为未成年人营造良好的社会环境,符合刑罚人性化的刑事理论,有助于刑罚教育功能的实现,有利于实现与世界法治文明接轨。我国现行宽严相济、轻轻重重的刑事政策为暂缓起诉制度的施行提供了政策依据。     

Self-Reported Delinquency in India: A Study of High School and Approved School Boys in Tamil Nadu

Findings from a self-reported delinquency survey among high school (N = 517) and institutionalized (N = 306) boys in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu are reported as part of a larger study designed to tap several aspects of delinquency phenomena in a developing society. The present research suggests that self-reported delinquency in India resembles that of juveniles in economically developed nations in several respects but differs from it in other ways. Specifically, as found elsewhere, self-reported delinquency in Tamil Nadu largely consists of minor property offenses or status-technical violations. Also, institutionalized boys (official delinquents) more frequently report delinquency involvement compared to high school boys. However, while a general inverse relationship was found between the SES rank of boys in various high schools and institutions and their reported delinquency involvement, it appears that this is not necessarily a direct linear relationship. In contrast to the findings of self-report research in developed nations, both the volume and frequency of self-admitted involvement in delinquency is comparatively low for Tamil Nadu boys, reflecting the comparatively low offense and arrest rates for juveniles reported in official crime data in India. The implications of these findings are discussed.     

危机应对与财税法的有效发展

我国为应对经济危机所采行的大量财税政策成效甚为显著,但在财税的立法体制、权力行使、透明度、程序保障、法律意识和法治观念方面却存在突出问题,已直接影响财税法的有效发展,必须系统解决;危机应对与财税法的有效发展之间具有内在关联,尤其要求加强财税法领域的风险防控、信息披露、情事变更、财税调控等理论的研究,以更好地推进财税法治,促进经济与社会的良性运行和协调发展。     

地役权与相邻关系

地役权与相邻关系是相似的两种法律制度,都涉及对他人不动产的利用。相邻关系属于最小限度不动产利用的调整,是实现相邻不动产和谐利用的必要前提,认识相邻关系的关键在于如何判断最小限度利用。从妨害相邻关系的判断标准入手论证凡是属于最小限度利用的情形,必然构成相邻关系,除此以外的不动产利用应以地役权约定实现,所以相邻关系属于对不动产权利的限制或延伸,地役权则是一种约定权利,属于用益物权。     

An Apologia To Radical Dissent And A Supreme Court Test To Protect It

Some framers of the Constitution of the United States, scholars and Supreme Court justices have argued that protection and encouragement of democratic deliberation are at the core purpose of the First Amendment. Most of these individuals would, nevertheless, exclude radical political dissent from constitutional protection. They seem to disagree with Thomas Jefferson, who believed in the salutary effects of revolutionary speech and even the occasional revolution. Government action targeting terrorist speech and association extends from this reasoning. This article argues that extreme political speech has benefit to society. Building on a varied body of First Amendment opinions, the author proposes a five-part test to better protect the radical speech vital to self-government and the search for truth.     

虚假广告规制缺失的原因及治理路径

虚假广告的危害很大,它不仅侵犯了消费者的合法权益、扰乱市场交易活动,而且引发了公众对广告市场的信任危机。本文在对虚假广告规制缺失原因分析的基础上,提出追究名人代言广告的法律责任、建立举证责任倒置原则、双倍损害赔偿制度、加大对违法主体处罚力度、理顺广告监管机构与媒体之间关系等设想。     

提高公众参与度 完善公共政策的形成机制

公众参与公共政策制定是公众影响公共政策的重要途径之一,也是实现自身利益的最直接、最有效的参与方式。随着我国市场经济体制的完善和民主法制建设的推进,公众作为公共政策制定主体的重要组成部分,其参与的意识和要求也随之增强。因此,明确公众参与的意义,正确引导公众有序参与公共政策的制定,已成为现代政府迫切需要解决的问题。     

侵害患者知情同意权的损害赔偿研究

侵害患者知情同意权是一种独立的侵权行为。侵害患者知情同意权的法律责任有四个构成要件,侵害患者知情同意权的损害赔偿以《民法通则》和最高人民法院的相关司法解释为主,同时参照《条例》关于医疗事故损害赔偿的规定。     

论国际私法对维护和促进中国和平与发展的作用

中国的和平与发展是促进中国经济腾飞、提升中国综合国力、实现中华民族伟大复兴的重要进程。然而,中国威胁论却对中国的和平与发展产生了严重的负面影响。在当代国际安全背景下中国国际私法能否通过调整涉外民商事关系在一定程度上对消除中国威胁论和维护中国和平与发展有所作为?中国国际私法具有哪些维护和促进中国和平与发展的功能和作用?它又是如何在立法与司法实践上发挥维护和促进中国和平与发展的作用的?我国学界对上述问题的认识尚不够深入,对上述问题的深入探讨将有益于完善中国国际私法和促进中国的和平与发展。     

Chapter 2: Pay Now So You Won't Pay Later: The Effectiveness of Prevention Programming in the Fight to Reduce Delinquency

Community-based delinquency prevention programs, designed to work with youth and families before they become involved with the official court process, are relatively rare. Likewise, few studies have been published concerninge valuative research on such programs. This article reviews some background on program concepts, describes the operations of the Oakland County Probate Court Youth Assistance casework services program, and reports the results of a comprehensive program evaluation project. The findings suggest that prevention programming is one effective strategy to aid in reducing the likelihood of more costly court interventions. Recommendations for program development are offered.