共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
Jeffrey A. Ellsworth 《International Journal for the Semiotics of Law》2009,22(1):105-122
The author attempts to apply semiotic analysis to a question of family law. By examining the language used by the Supreme
Court in the title case, Michael H. v. Gerald D., along with the case briefs, lower court opinions, other Supreme Court cases and prior legal scholarship, the author attempts
to determine the requisite relationships between father–child and father–mother in order for a legal tie to exist between
a father and his biological child. The author tries to not only determine the necessary circumstances but also the political
ideology that distinguishes these familial ties. The author further attempts to analyze the goals of these underlying political
ideologies. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Hon. Leonard Edwards 《Family Court Review》2005,43(4):544-553
The William H. Rehnquist Award is one of the most celebrated judicial honors in the country. 1 It is given each year to a state court judge who demonstrates the "highest level of judicial excellence, integrity, fairness, and professional ethics." 2 The 2004 recipient, Judge Leonard Edwards, is the Supervising Judge of the Santa Clara County, California juvenile dependency court. 3 He is the first juvenile court judge to receive this prestigious award. During the 24 years he has held his position, Judge Edwards has worked extremely hard to improve how the juvenile court system serves troubled families. He has founded two organizations to achieve this end, the Juvenile Court Judges of California and the Santa Clara County Domestic Violence Council. 4 Judge Edwards serves as a lead judge in San Jose's Model Court, which is one of twenty-five jurisdictions in the country which utilizes new ideas and techniques to improve adoption rates for children in foster care. 5 Moreover, he has worked as president of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. 6 Below is the speech he gave after accepting the award from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy. The speech notes the importance of the award to everyone working in America's juvenile courts. 相似文献
8.
ADEJARE OLADOSU 《Ratio juris》1991,4(2):152-176
Abstract. The author discusses Hart's concept of legal obligation, especially his contention that there is an obligation to obey the law which is peculiarly legal, i.e., non-moral. This view is held to be mistaken. What is denied is that legal rules, merely by their being issued, offer a justification for the use of coercion to ensure compliance with them. Although moral and other social (customary) rules are considered self-justifying, that is not the case of legal rules. Any analogy between these two types of rules in justifying their implementation by force is deemed wrong.** 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Netherlands International Law Review - 相似文献
14.
冯健鹏 《南京大学法律评论》2011,(2):61-69
"反多数难题"是美国宪法学中聚讼纷纭的经典议题,其中有两条重要的线索,即以伊利的"代议增强论"为代表的"程序宪法"论和以却伯的"看不见的宪法"为代表的"高级法论",前者是程序思维的体现,后者是实质思维的体现;而在两者分歧中则展现了这两种法律思维彼此之间的张力。虽然"反多数难题"是美国宪政中的一个独有难题,但其中的程序思维和实质思维及其互相之间的关系命题,却是具有普遍意义和参考价值的。 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Hon. Jonathan Lippman 《Family Court Review》2009,47(2):199-203
The William H. Rehnquist Award is one of the most celebrated judicial honors in the country. It is given each year to a state court judge who demonstrates the “highest level of judicial excellence, integrity, fairness, and professional ethics.” The 2008 recipient, Jonathan Lippman, was recently appointed and confirmed as Chief Judge of the State of New York. Chief Judge Lippman was previously the Presiding Justice of the Appellate Division of the First Judicial Department of the New York State Supreme Court. He was appointed New York's Chief Administrative Judge by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye and served from January 1996 to May 2007 and was responsible for the operation of a court system with a $2.4 billion budget, 1300 state‐paid judges, 2300 town and village judges, and 16,000 nonjudicial personnel. Among his numerous professional activities, Chief Judge Lippman served as president of the Conference of State Court Administrators from 2005 to 2006 and was the vice‐chair of the National Center for State Courts from 2005 to 2006, where he was a member of the Board of Directors from 2003 to 2007. During his tenure, Chief Judge Lippman has been the recipient of numerous awards and recognitions, including the 2006 Fund For Modern Courts Cyrus R. Vance Tribute for Vision, Integrity and Dedication to the Fair Administration of Justice Personified by Cyrus R. Vance (November 27, 2006); the New York County Lawyers’ Association Conspicuous Service Award in Recognition of Many Years of Outstanding Public Service (September 28, 2006); and the Award for Excellence in Public Service of the New York State Bar Association's Committee on Attorneys in Public Service (January 24, 2006). Chief Judge Lippman received a Bachelor of Arts in Government and International Relations from New York University, Washington Square College, where he graduated cum laude in 1965. He also received his J.D. from New York University in 1968. Below is the speech he delivered after accepting the William H. Rehnquist Award from U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts. 相似文献
20.