共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 515 毫秒
1.
2.
亲友一关,不太好过,尤其是对于握有一定权力的人。旧时代,一人得道,鸡犬升天,随处可见,不足为怪;新时代,权力是人民给的,用以谋私,令人不齿,用以徇情,何以服众?但是,要铁面 相似文献
3.
4.
习近平 《思想政治工作研究》2018,(6)
正(2018年5月2日)各位同学,各位老师,同志们:今天,有机会同大家一起座谈,感到非常高兴。再过两天,就是五四青年节,也是北大建校120周年校庆日。首先,我代表党中央,向北大全体师生员工和海内外校友,向全国各族青年,向全国青年工作者,致以节日的问候!近年来,北大继承光荣传统,坚持社会主义办学方向,立德树人成果丰硕,双一流建设成效显著,服务经济社会发展成绩突出,学校发展思路清晰,办学实力和影响力显著增强,令 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
水权与水权的界定--水资源利用的产权经济学分析 总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8
马晓强 《北京行政学院学报》2002,(1):37-41
在公有水权基础上实行可交易水权制度涉及到三个重要环节,即水权的界定、水价以及水权运作规则和水资源管理,其中水权的界定是水资源市场形成和运行的前提条件,没有排他性水权的确立,水权的让渡和交易是不可能的.本文从产权经济学的理论出发,分析水权的清晰界定与水资源市场的关系,并在此基础上分析水资源利用中的各种水权关系,指出进一步界定和明晰水资源的配水量权是实现水权制度创新的前提条件. 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
B. Delworth Gardner 《政策研究评论》1985,5(2):353-363
Current water institutions were developed for conditions of water penty rather than scarcity and are unable to allocate water resources efficiently under conditions such as those in the arid West. This paper reviews riparian, appropriation and correlative water law as well as existing admin- istrative rules governing water use in California and finds that all of these institutions violate norms of economic efficiency. The review suggests that decentralized water systems such as mutual irrigation companies with their appropriate laws are more flexible than centralized federal or state systems in promoting water movement to higher valued use. The paper concludes that institutional mechanisms which promote rather than inhibit water trades and transfers are more appropriate to arid areas and that these institutions will become increasingly popular as water becomes increasingly scarce. 相似文献
18.
19.
The article takes the case of protest against water privatization in Ireland to show that protestors with high levels of instrumental motivation as opposed to ideological motivation are more likely to protest. In order to explain this we uniquely combine Klandermans’ social psychology of protest with Gramsci’s theory of hegemony. By bridging these two bodies of theory, we provide an interdisciplinary account of the reason why protestors serve to uphold the exact power structures they intend to challenge. We argue that for water movements to be successful they must focus equally on both their instrumental and ideological motivations to ensure that power structures are confronted. This would enable movements to devise a coherent counter-hegemonic discourse, which is essential to contest the dominant global hegemony of water marketization. 相似文献