试论专利申请的本国优先权

试论专利申请的本国优先权○李云苏号朋（一）专利申请的优先权是《保护工业产权巴黎公约》（以下简称《巴黎公约》，中规定的一项重要权利。所谓优先权，是指申请人就某项发明在一个缔约国首次提出申请之后，在一定期限内又向其他缔约国提出申请时，申请人有权要求以第一...     

1993年船舶优先权和抵押权国际公约

本公约各缔约国,认识到改善船舶融资条件和发展国家商船队的必要性,确认宜在船舶优先权和抵押权领域实现国际统一性,因此确信需要制订一项关于船舶优先权和抵押权的国际法律文书,决定为此缔结一项公约,并因此协议如下: 第1条抵押权、“质权”及担保物权的承认和执行对海运船舶的抵押权、“质权”和性质相同的应登记担保物权     

欧洲专利法修订介评

修订后的欧洲专利公约对专利申请语言文本，专利优先权的行使与延长，专利新颖性及专利权利范围更正等内容做了新的规定，公约简化了欧洲专利保护的程序，便利了专利申请人和专利权人，同时保留欧洲专利高质量的审查标准。     

论我国专利优先权制度

优先权原则是《保护工业产权巴黎公约》的基本原则之一,它为国际专利申请提供了便利.本文将以我国专利优先权制度为对象,具体论述我国专利优先权的相关内容,分析建立该制度的价值,说明适用专利优先权原则时应注意的问题并针对我国目前的现状提出完善该制度的建议.     

关于在香港特别行政区知识产权署提出的首次申请的优先权的规定

为方便在香港特别行政区知识产权署首次提出短期专利申请或者外观设计注册申请的申请人在国家知识产权局专利局提出专利申请,特规定如下:申请人自其短期专利申请在香港特别行政区知识产权署第一次提出之日起十二个月内,或者自其外观设计注册申请在香港特别行政区知识产权署第一次提出之日起六个月内,又在国家知识产权局专利局就相同主题提出专利申请的,可以享有优先权。申请人要求上述短期专利申请或者外观设计注册申请的优先权的,应当在申请的时候提出书面声明,并且在三个月内提交第一次提出的上述短期专利申请或者外观设计注册申请(以下称…     

论涉台海事案件直接适用国际海事公约

中国涉台海事案件类比涉外案件处理。当中国为国际海事公约缔约国时,公约在涉台海事案件中有直接适用之余地。国际海事公约的直接适用以该公约与国内法存在冲突或者国内法缺失相关规定为前提,当公约与国内法规定相一致时,则适用国内法。同时,应区分私法和公法性质的国际海事公约,私法性质的国际海事公约能够直接适用,而公法性质的国际海事公约其直接适用的范围以技术条款为限。当中国为非公约缔约国之时,因国际海事公约的效力及于非缔约国,因此通过冲突规范的指引,国际海事公约也可以适用于涉台海事案件。     

论《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》的适用——析CISG第一条第一款b项

《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》（以下简称《公约》）是目前国际货物销售合同领域一部最重要的国际统一实体法。到目前为止,共有76个国家成为了CISG的缔约国,而且公约缔约国所占的贸易份额也已经超过了世界贸易总量的三分之二。虽然《公约》在世界范围内受到广泛推崇,但《公约》在适用中也存在着不可避免的局限性。《公约》作为国际条约,其管辖的是国际经济法领域内的国际货物销售,而在该领域内各缔约国都有其各自的国内法规定,《公约》的适用在一定程度上会对各缔约国的国内法产生一定的冲击,使得原先由国内法规定的事项划归公约管辖。因此,在司法实践中,不少缔约国的法院会直接适用国内法对国际货物贸易纠纷作出裁判,而不考虑《公约》的适用。此外《公约》第一条（1）（b）本身的模糊性和不确定性以及第一条（1）（b）与地九十五条之间的关系等,这些问题都给《公约》的适用造成了较大障碍。     

论专利法中的优先权

纵观专利制度,我们会发现:制定专利法的根本目的是为了鼓励发明创造,使发明人早日将其发明公之于世,更新技术,促进经济发展。而发明要取得专利的首要条件就是必须具有新颖性,新颖性的判断应该根据申请日(或发明日),这种日期的确定很自然地涉及优先权问题。早在1883乍,优先权就已成为保护工业产权巴黎公约三大原则之一。优先权与国民待遇原则一起,构成了巴黎公约所建立的国际工业产权保护制度的两     

船舶优先权和抵押权国际公约在日内瓦通过

1993年4月19日至5月6日,联合国贸易与发展会议和国际海事组织在日内瓦联合召开了船舶优先权和抵押权外交大会,审议并通过了《1993年船舶优先权和抵押权国际公约》。该公约旨在改善船舶的融资条件,鼓励各国发展自己的商船队,促进有关船舶优先权和抵押权方面的法律统一。公约没有给“船舶优先权”下定义,但其真实含义是指海事索赔人通过法律诉讼程序向船舶所有人,光船承租人,船舶经营人提出的海事索赔,     

国内申请人对我国商标优行权制度应用的探讨

优先权制度是由《保护工业产权巴黎公约》确立的。根据《巴黎公约》,优先权的定义可以表述为:以申请人在一成员国提出一项工业产权的正式申请为基础,在一定期限内该申请人可以在其他任何一个成员国提出对该工业产权的申请,这些在后的申请被认为是与第一次申请同一天提出的。     

A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness

A brief self-report is described that assesses propensity for male abusiveness of a female partner in intimate relationships. The Propensity for Abusiveness Scale (PAS) items is nonreactive and contains no explicit reference to abusive behavior. The scale has good psychometric properties, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 and three distinct factors. Data were provided by 140 men in treatment for wife assault and by 63 of their female partners. In addition, 44 demographically matched men and 33 of their partners were evaluated. The scale was validated against reports of abuse victimization by men's female partners using the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1988). The scale correlated 0.51 with women's reports of male Domination/Isolation tactics, and 0.47 with Emotional Abuse scale scores. A discriminant function for high versus low abusiveness indicated that the PAS correctly classified 82.2% of men into high (one standard deviation below) abusiveness. Social desirability corrections do not significantly change the trend of correlations of the PAS with criterion variables. A cross validation of the scale supported the initial results. The scale also correlates significantly with physical abuse.     

Ethics for Lawyers or Ethics for Citizens? New Directions for Legal Education

The Lord Chancellor's Advisory Committee on Legal Education andConduct (ACLEC) has called for the reconstruction of the ethicalfoundations of legal education. However, it has not justified its premisethat teaching legal values at the initial stage will enhance professionallegal ethics. It is argued that the present system of education, given itstechnocratic, individualistic, and authoritarian tendencies, cannot meetACLEC's challenge. A more ethical legal education can be envisagedwithin a neo-Aristotelian framework. This perspective emphasizes thereflexivity between micro and macro ethics, and utilizes the active andparticipatory learning approaches which should enable students to engagein meaningful moral discourse and problem solving.     

外观设计专利授权的实质要件探讨

外观设计专利新颖性有绝对新颖性、相对新颖性和缓和新颖性三种。我国正在修订的专利法宜继续坚持混合新颖性标准,其比较对象原则上应限于产品外观设计.抵触申请也可破坏外观设计专利申请的新颖性。我国外观设计专利应引入创造性标准,对同一申请人同日在相同产品上中请的多个相似外观设计,不宜被认定为重复授权。此外,我国外观设计专利应继续坚持“美感”标准。     

Challenges for teaching interaction skills for law students

Abstract

Are lawyers witty courtroom heroes or professionals working with and for people? Is law only universal judgements and afterthoughts or could it also be preventive and proactive individual planning and dialogue? The traditional legal education could be seen to have been based on the first assumptions. The course “Interaction skills for lawyers”, in the Faculty of Law at the University of Helsinki (Finland), evolves instead from the latter assumptions. In this article we relate our starting points in planning the course and evaluate our challenges and experiences in developing it.     

Cooperation Challenges for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon

While the Agreement between the United Nations and Lebanon providesa solid framework for cooperation between the Special Tribunaland Lebanon, Security Council Resolution 1757 (2007) is silenton the duty of third states to assist the Tribunal. As a result,the Special Tribunal will be confronted with a variety of obstaclesand problems in obtaining their cooperation, which may seriouslyhamper its functioning.     

论刑事审判监督程序的理论基础

对我国刑事审判监督程序进行改革和完善 ,就要对刑事再审制度的理论基础进行深入研究。对于西方国家既判力理论、避免双重危险理论等原则中所体现的有益价值观 ,也应从我国的实际出发 ,在构建我国刑事再审制度的理论基础中加以吸收。通过研究刑事再审制度的理论基础 ,推动刑事诉讼改革 ,逐步建立和完善中国特色的刑事再审制度 ,努力促进在全社会实现公平和正义的目标。     

Association for Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordinators

On November 6, 2014, the AFCC Board of Directors endorsed the Association for Conflict Resolution (ACR) Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordination, including ethical principles for Eldercaring Coordinators, training protocols, and court pilot project template. The collaboration between Task Forces created by ACR and the Florida Chapter of AFCC, composed of twenty U.S./Canadian and twenty Florida‐wide organizations, produced both an overarching guide to assist in the development of programs and a more detailed model addressing state/province‐specific needs and characteristics. Eldercaring coordination is a dispute resolution option specifically for high‐conflict cases involving the care, needs, and safety of elders.

Key Points for the Family Court Community:
• There are currently no dispute resolution options for parties involved in high‐conflict cases regarding the care, needs, and safety of an elder.
• The ACR Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordination address the discrepancies between dispute resolution options available for parents in conflict regarding their minor children and mature families with unresolved concerns about the care, needs, and safety of an elder.
• The ACR Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordination provide information regarding the ethical practice of eldercaring coordination including a specific definition, recommended qualifications, ethical practices, grievance procedures, training protocols, and a court pilot project template.
• The practice of eldercaring coordination will address the influx of court cases expected as baby boomers continue to age, reducing delays in court hearings, as parties will have the opportunity to resolve their concerns without continuous court attention.
• As of June 2015, five states began Pilot Projects on Eldercaring Coordination, which will be studied by an independent research group to enhance the progress of the process and to develop the best practices for initiating the programs elsewhere.

     

永远怀念郑成思老师

2006年9月10日,当全中国的教师们还在以各自的方式感受第22个教师节的时候,你走了。我们只是感到突然,但并不意外。因为从你的病情被确诊的那一刻起我们就知道,这一天,正在一步一步向我们逼近。一年多来,每当星期二上班或有其他聚会的时候,我们总是小心翼翼地谈到你,三言两语而已。因为我们深怕对你的健康的担忧和牵挂会让我们没有办法若无其事地工作和生活。我们一直有一种凄然的默契:没有你的消息就是