This article explores the prospects for the EU’s role as a global leader in a transitional international order, based on the assumption that multilateral principles will remain at the heart of global governance. It focuses in particular upon the EU’s 2016 Global Strategy in the context of three principal trends and challenges for global governance: political and normative challenges, legitimacy challenges, and systemic challenges. It argues that the prospects for the EU’s global role are limited as long as the EU remains committed to traditional forms and norms of global governance, because these are increasingly out of touch with the emerging international order, and the nature of contemporary collective action challenges. 相似文献
Two years have past since September 11 events. Then to what extent has the U. S. global strategy changed? This is still a question in dispute. From the actions taken by U. S. A. and the various American documents published in the past two years, we can find that there have been no much changes in U. S. global strategic objectives. The essence of the disputes over "New Empire" in U. S. A. is how to maintain U. S. hegemonic position as long as possible. Although the pattern of 相似文献
On March 24, 1999, depending on its advanced technology and weapons, theS-led North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) circumvented the Unit-ed Nations and brazenly used military forces against the Republic of Yugoslavia.The continuous bombing for more than two months has brought unprecedentedcatastrophe to Yugoslavia which used to be called the Garden of Eden. On May8, NATO with the US as leader again violated the UN Charter, internationallaws and the Vienna Diplomatic Convention and flagrantly bombed the Chinese 相似文献
Migration did not figure in the European Security Strategy of 2003. Never mentioned as a threat, it was not even mentioned as a risk. Thirteen years later, migration is widely cited in the new European Union Global Strategy. Much richer than the previous security document and global in aspiration, the Global Strategy treats migration as a challenge and an opportunity, recognising the key role it plays in a rapidly changing security landscape. However, this multi-faceted perspective on migration uncovers starkly different political and normative claims, all of which are legitimate in principle. The different narratives on migration present in the new strategic document attest to the Union’s comprehensive approach to the issue but also to critical and possibly competing normative dilemmas. 相似文献
Emerging trends suggest a more inclusive and collaborative approach to addressing international infectious disease issues, but without an overarching governance structure and judicial forum in place, outcomes will remain suboptimal. This essay outlines and analyzes several initiatives currently underway and proposes a new comprehensive global governance structure for infectious disease. This proposed structure has built-in incentives for states—from both the developed and developing world—to meet their regulatory obligations and integrates the myriad non-state actors operating in this space, including NGOs and the private sector. It also incorporates an adjudicative body that is able to enforce compliance and resolve issues of contention. Lastly, this essay identifies innovative funding mechanisms and contemplates the venue best suited to host and administer this new global governance structure for infectious disease with a focus on UN-based models.
