北京市下发《关于切实加强社区矫正和安置帮教工作风险管理的通知》

去年,北京市矫正帮教办结合形势和工作实际,制定下发了《关于切实加强社区矫正和安置帮教工作风险管理的通知》(以下简称《通知》),在全市全面实施风险管理,深化社区矫正和安置帮教工作。《通知》对社区矫正和安置帮教工作风险管理做出界定,即在对社区服刑人员和刑释解教人员实施社区矫正和安置帮     

高宗泽、于宁谈中国律师将致力于开拓法律服务的业务领域和市场空闻

党中央、国务院高度重视安置帮教工作。罗干、周永康同志多次作出重要批示,各级党委政府也对这项工作给予了大力支持;安置帮教工作机构进一步健全,工作制度进一步完善,围绕党和国家工作大局,深入开展工作,为减少重新违法犯罪、维护社会稳定做出了重要贡献。 各级安置帮教工作机构努力探索创新安置帮教工作思路,形成以政府为主导、社会各方面力量共同参与的工作格局,逐步实现帮教社会化、就     

做好帮教安置工作维护鹤城稳定

黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市是闻名中外的鹤城。近年来．市司法局对于刑释解教人员帮教安置工作认真贯彻执行“教育、感化、挽救”工作方针,采取切实有力措施．取得较好的工作效果。近三年来,全市共接收释解人员1352人。书面衔接、综合安置率、落实帮教率均达98％以上．无一人重新犯罪．为维护社会稳定和促进经济发展做出了积极贡献。市司法局先后被省委政法委评为社会治安综合治理先进单位．被省司法厅评为帮教安置工作先进集体等。     

出台安置帮教办法 降低重新犯罪率

今年1月1日,江西省鹰潭市发布了《鹰潭市刑释解教人员安置帮教办法》的政府令。据悉,该《办法》是江西省首部针对各有关部门和社会力量对刑满释放后5年内、解除劳教后3年内的刑释解教人员进行就业安置和教育帮助的管理办法。该《办法》共五章31条,对安置帮教工作的性质、内容、主要任务、工作原则、工作机构及职责、衔接与帮教、就业安置及政府扶持、奖惩等做出了具体规定。     

积极探索帮教工作社会化的新方法

近年来,广州市的安置帮教工作通过构建社会帮教网络,建立社会帮教制度,不断开拓帮教工作新领域,努力摸索新时期帮教社会化的模式和途径,帮教社会化工作取得明显成效。尽管社会帮教的效果和质量逐年上升,安置帮教的环境逐步得到优化,但就当前来说,也存在着困难和问题。如由于世俗观念的碰撞,社会上还有相当一部分的人对刑释解教人员的歧视和偏见挥之不去,对他们退避三舍,更谈不上为他们提供帮助和服务;个别帮教成员单位对自己应肩负的帮教责任有推诿现象;各社会团体、群众组织和各界人士参与帮教工作的热情还未充分调动起来;帮教经费匮乏,阻碍了工作向纵深发展等。鉴于此,笔者建议从以下几方面开拓帮教社会化工作:     

关口前移 拓展安置帮教新内涵——长沙市岳麓区积极推进安置帮教工作向监所延伸

近年来,湖南省长沙市岳麓区司法局在按常规做好安置帮教工作的基础上,积极探索将安置帮教工作向监所延伸,初步形成了监所和社会资源共享、双向互动的安置帮教新格局,拓展了安置帮教工作新内涵。     

关于我区安置帮教工作存在的问题及对策

最近,重庆市黔江区司法局深入片区作了一次关于刑释解教人员安置帮教工作的专项调查,通过听、查、访、看等形式,基本摸清了辖区刑释解教人员安置帮教工作的现状。一、困难和问题(一)安置帮教工作缺乏法律法规依据。因为安置帮教工作缺乏法律法规依据,所以在开展工作中碰到具体问题时,安置帮教工作主管部门指导工作的依据不足,导致对刑释解教人员的安置不是靠法律法规,而是凭感情和工作责任感来开展,使得安置帮教工作不稳     

创新帮教载体 丰富帮教形式

河北省石家庄市深泽县安置帮教工作创新帮教载体．丰富帮教形式．强化帮教措施．不断推动安置帮教工作取得新进展和新成效。全县共有刑释解教人员151名．全部得到安置．帮教率和安置率达100％．重新犯罪率控制在1％以下。     

拓展社会帮教应注重『四性』

社会帮教是劳教教育工作的组成部分。我所长期以来重视社会帮教工作,近几年更是在拓展社会帮教形式、途径、教育面的同时,注重“四性”,为提高社会帮教效果作了有益探索,并取得突破。     

如何充分发挥安置帮教各职能部门的作用

在安置帮教实际工作中,经常出现职能部门把参与安置帮教工作看作额外负担,对承担这项任务的积极性不高,司法行政部门在工作中唱“独角戏”的现象。如何提高各职能部门参与安置帮教工作的主动性和积极性,充分发挥其职能作用?笔者结合扬州市安置帮教工作的实践,谈几点看法:     

流浪乞讨与管制--从贫困救助看中央与地方权限的界定

随着《收容遣送办法》的废止,个人自由权利与社会治安秩序之间的现实冲突比过去更为突显。应转变中央和地方关系的传统思维,在允许地方更多自主权和选择权的同时,更充分地保障公民个人的宪法基本权利。无论是中央和地方关系的法律界定,还是公民权利的宪法保障,都要求建立独立的司法机构以审查地方立法的有效性。     

Implementing and evaluating crime prevention and control programs and policies

The history of crime prevention and control efforts in the United States has demonstrated little progressive improvement in our ability to deter crime. The major obstacles to implementing effective interventions and policies have been a weak scientific knowledge base about how to prevent crime, the research community's inability to effectively disseminate what is known about the causes of crime and to translate this knowledge into operational programs and policies, and a resistance on the part of practitioners and policy makers to evaluate programs and policies and to use this information in the development of new programs and policies. In the last decade, there have been major advances in our understanding about the causes of crime and we have now demonstrated the effectiveness of selected prevention programs. But there is little evidence that this scientific knowledge is informing current practice or policy. Problems in the dissemination of this information and the resistance to utilizing it remain. These problems are discussed and suggestions are made for addressing them. Our knowledge base remains modest, but it is now sufficient to inform policy and practice. The research community must work to do a better job of disseminating this information and overcoming the resistance to utilizing it before we will be successful in implementing effective crime prevention programs and policies. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

International aid,trade and investment and access and allocation

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics - The access to goods and their allocation (who gets what, when, where and how) is one of the analytical problems of the 2009...     

Accommodation and Satisfaction: Women and Men Lawyers and the Balance of Work and Family

This study of graduates of the University of Michigan Law School from the late 1970s reports on the differing ways that women and men have responded to the conflicting claims of work and family. It finds that women with children who have entered the profession have indeed continued to bear the principal responsibilities for the care of children, but it also finds that these women, with all their burdens, are more satisfied with their careers and with the balance of their family and professional lives than other women and than men.     

真相与正义，探究与辩护，科学与法律

在美国法律文化塑造下的对抗制诉讼制度和科学的调查程序之间存在着紧张关系（tension），在法律所关注的裁决终局性（finality）和科学所追求的持续性纠错（oven—minded fallibilism）之间存在着紧张关系。长期以来，法律界都试图通过可采性法律规则归化科学证言，结果导致联邦法官担负起广泛的审查职责；近期，法庭指定专家的制度实践导致对抗制度做出某些修正，这种制度实践已经被批评为“带有纠问色彩”（inquisitorial），甚至“违背了民主的要求”（undemocratic）。在分析这些制度利弊的过程中，我们有必要考察其他法律系统的经验教训。     

油气储运防火安全分析及预防措施

本文主要从设备故障与维护、防静电、动火作业、执行操作规程等几个方面引起的爆炸和火灾进行分析,制定对应的防护措施。提出了以做好设备维护保养、防静电处理、做好防火设计及安全装置、落实动火作业措施及强化安全培训等方面进行综合防控,消除油气储运过程中引起的爆炸和火灾,以实现安全生产。     

Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law

Abstract. There is tension between the adversarialism of the U.S. legal culture and the investigative procedures of the sciences, and between the law's concern for finality and the open‐ended fallibilism of science. A long history of attempts to domesticate scientific testimony by legal rules of admissibility has left federal judges with broad screening responsibilities; recent adaptations of adversarialism in the form of court‐appointed experts have been criticized as “inquisitorial,” even “undemocratic.” In exploring their benefits and disadvantages, it would make sense to look to the experience of other legal systems.