略论跨国并购的审查监管

近年来,伴随着经济全球化的发展,跨国并购成为国际投资的主要形式之一,随着我国改革开放的不断深入,跨国并购也逐渐成为我国企业"走出去"和跨国公司"走进来"的主要方式,但我国对跨国并购的法律规制却存在着很多不足,需要健全相关法律制度。本文主要从跨国并购审查监管的角度,通过分析我国及欧美的相关法律制度,对完善我国跨国并购的相关法律制度提出一些建议。     

从法律的视角浅谈中国应对跨国并购之策

随着经济全球化、金融自由化趋势的迅猛发展,跨国并购成为当今国际直接投资的重要方式。跨国并购兴起的原因耐人寻味,值得深思。同时,它对中国经济的发展也产生了深远的影响,我国对西方国家有关企业跨国并购的法律规则应该取其精华,去其糟粕。通过法律的手段来进一步完善我国现有规制企业跨国并购的法律体系在国际贸易中通过与跨过企业互利互惠的经贸合作,促进我国的综合经济实力。     

论企业跨国并购的国内法调整

企业跨国并购作为一种外资进入模式,在其日益盛行的今天给东道国的国内法律制度带来了一定程度的冲击与挑战。入世的中国应当及时建立起完善的跨国并购法律体系,积极融入世界经济一体化进程中。本文首先对企业跨国并购法律关系的基本概念进行界定;然后,通过我国企业跨国并购立法的现状分析,提出存在问题;针对存在问题并结合外国立法实践,对企业跨国并购的法律规制提出建议。     

谈跨国并购合同中应注意的法律问题

跨国并购活动是一项非常复杂、风险极高的投资活动，因此，借鉴和研究发达国家的跨国并购经验、完善我国的相关法律制度，提高我国企业跨国并购的成功率，是国际经济法领域值得研究的重要课题。在跨国并购的过程中，要选择好适当的并购形式，做好井购前的准备，签订并购合同并处理好相关的法律问题。     

我国外资并购法律制度研究

跨国并购已成为国际直接投资的一种重要方式,我国应当利用这一契机,鼓励和发展外国企业以并 购方式对我国进行投资。从法律角度而言,我国外资并购立法应紧密结合政策导向,一方面消除现有对外资并购的不合理限制,为促进和发展外资并购服务,另一方面又要完善对外资并购的管理,规范外资并购行为     

我国关于企业并购准入和待遇制度解析

企业并购是复杂的商业行为和法律行为,跨国并购尤其如此。在跨国并购大环境下,我国该如何对待外资来华并购,该赋予并购方何种待遇？本文从我国企业并购的法律环境出发,试图分析并解决以上问题,对中国涉外并购的市场准入和国民待遇制度作出分析。     

我国加入WTO后补贴与反补贴问题法律对策研究

随着我国市场经济体制的建立和出口贸易的发展,西方国家将会很快把反补贴法适用于我国。本文在阐述外国对我国的反补贴形势和我国补贴与反补贴的立法与实践及其与WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协议》的差距的基础上,全面、系统地论述了我国的法律对策。     

跨国并购的反垄断规制——兼评《反垄断法》(征求意见稿)

我国加入WTO后 ,市场经济环境的改善以及利用外资渠道的扩宽将为外商的跨国并购提供更多的发展机会。跨国并购在促进国内产业发展的同时 ,也会带来一些负面影响 ,如垄断。因此 ,尽快构建我国的并购反垄断规制法律制度 ,将跨国并购纳入该制度框架成为当务之急。本文借鉴美、德的立法和司法实践 ,并结合已公开的《反垄断法》(征求意见稿 ) ,提出了构建和完善建立起我国并购的反垄断规制法律制度的实体和程序方面的思路和建议。     

WTO《SCM协议》下补贴问题法律对策研究

本文在阐述外国对我国的反补贴形势和我国关于补贴的立法与实践及其与ＷＴＯ《ＳＣＭ协议》的差距的基础上,提出了我国的法律对策,即依据《协议》调整、完善我国的补贴立法;充分利用发展中国家的特殊待遇以及积极进行反补贴应诉等。     

WTO下的反补贴机制研究

随着我国经济体制改革的不断深入和对外贸易的全面发展,补贴和反补贴已逐渐为人们所熟悉;而且,随着我国《反倾销反补贴条例》的出台,补贴和反补贴的法律观念正在从更深的层次上影响我国的经济生活和法律生活。然而,究竟何为反补贴,其运行机制怎样,这是理论上和立法上都需要澄清和回答的问题。随着中国的成功加入WTO,我国经贸、法律界人士更有必要深入研究有关反补贴的理论和立法问题,特别是 WTO 反补贴机制的相关问题,以顺应经济一体化、法律全球化的国际大趋势。     

流浪乞讨与管制--从贫困救助看中央与地方权限的界定

随着《收容遣送办法》的废止,个人自由权利与社会治安秩序之间的现实冲突比过去更为突显。应转变中央和地方关系的传统思维,在允许地方更多自主权和选择权的同时,更充分地保障公民个人的宪法基本权利。无论是中央和地方关系的法律界定,还是公民权利的宪法保障,都要求建立独立的司法机构以审查地方立法的有效性。     

Implementing and evaluating crime prevention and control programs and policies

The history of crime prevention and control efforts in the United States has demonstrated little progressive improvement in our ability to deter crime. The major obstacles to implementing effective interventions and policies have been a weak scientific knowledge base about how to prevent crime, the research community's inability to effectively disseminate what is known about the causes of crime and to translate this knowledge into operational programs and policies, and a resistance on the part of practitioners and policy makers to evaluate programs and policies and to use this information in the development of new programs and policies. In the last decade, there have been major advances in our understanding about the causes of crime and we have now demonstrated the effectiveness of selected prevention programs. But there is little evidence that this scientific knowledge is informing current practice or policy. Problems in the dissemination of this information and the resistance to utilizing it remain. These problems are discussed and suggestions are made for addressing them. Our knowledge base remains modest, but it is now sufficient to inform policy and practice. The research community must work to do a better job of disseminating this information and overcoming the resistance to utilizing it before we will be successful in implementing effective crime prevention programs and policies. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

International aid,trade and investment and access and allocation

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics - The access to goods and their allocation (who gets what, when, where and how) is one of the analytical problems of the 2009...     

Accommodation and Satisfaction: Women and Men Lawyers and the Balance of Work and Family

This study of graduates of the University of Michigan Law School from the late 1970s reports on the differing ways that women and men have responded to the conflicting claims of work and family. It finds that women with children who have entered the profession have indeed continued to bear the principal responsibilities for the care of children, but it also finds that these women, with all their burdens, are more satisfied with their careers and with the balance of their family and professional lives than other women and than men.     

真相与正义，探究与辩护，科学与法律

在美国法律文化塑造下的对抗制诉讼制度和科学的调查程序之间存在着紧张关系（tension），在法律所关注的裁决终局性（finality）和科学所追求的持续性纠错（oven—minded fallibilism）之间存在着紧张关系。长期以来，法律界都试图通过可采性法律规则归化科学证言，结果导致联邦法官担负起广泛的审查职责；近期，法庭指定专家的制度实践导致对抗制度做出某些修正，这种制度实践已经被批评为“带有纠问色彩”（inquisitorial），甚至“违背了民主的要求”（undemocratic）。在分析这些制度利弊的过程中，我们有必要考察其他法律系统的经验教训。     

油气储运防火安全分析及预防措施

本文主要从设备故障与维护、防静电、动火作业、执行操作规程等几个方面引起的爆炸和火灾进行分析,制定对应的防护措施。提出了以做好设备维护保养、防静电处理、做好防火设计及安全装置、落实动火作业措施及强化安全培训等方面进行综合防控,消除油气储运过程中引起的爆炸和火灾,以实现安全生产。     

Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law

Abstract. There is tension between the adversarialism of the U.S. legal culture and the investigative procedures of the sciences, and between the law's concern for finality and the open‐ended fallibilism of science. A long history of attempts to domesticate scientific testimony by legal rules of admissibility has left federal judges with broad screening responsibilities; recent adaptations of adversarialism in the form of court‐appointed experts have been criticized as “inquisitorial,” even “undemocratic.” In exploring their benefits and disadvantages, it would make sense to look to the experience of other legal systems.