共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
刑法主观主义与中国刑法 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
一、刑法主观主义与中国当代刑法理论翻开历史画卷 ,不难发现这样一个朴素的真理———人类社会自从建立刑事法律制度以来 ,对犯罪者科以刑事责任 ,一般都是通过刑罚的力量来实现的 ,“然而科人以刑责 ,何以能实现正义 ,亦即刑事责任之理论根据如何 ,是乃刑法思想之根本问题 ,每因时代不同而异其见解。”①一般认为 ,在刑事责任之理论根据问题上 ,西方刑法学说史上最经典的对立是刑事古典学派与刑事近代学派之间的论战 ,两派争论很大程度上就是主观主义 (又称行为人主义 )与客观主义 (又称行为主义 )的对立。② 客观主义学派和主观主义学派… 相似文献
5.
6.
Shachar Eldar 《Criminal Law and Philosophy》2018,12(4):695-705
In the recently published collection, Criminal Law and the Authority of the State, two contributions allude to an analogy with parental authority as a means to a better understanding of the institution of criminal punishment, but reach different conclusions. Malcolm Thorburn uses the parental authority analogy to justify the institution of state punishment as an assertion of robust authority over offenders. Antje du Bois-Pedain uses the same analogy to advocate the idea of punishment as an inclusionary practice, designed to reintegrate offenders into society. I argue that Thorburn’s theory of robust authority is inconsistent if not self-contradictory when it tries to assume a liberal posture, and that du Bois-Pedain’s reintegrative model provides a better account of the justification and objectives of state punishment. 相似文献
7.
8.
就目前而言,中国刑法学的表面繁荣的背后暴露出理论创新的贫乏与回应实践问题乏力的危机。所以刑法学人的首要任务,就是建立刑法学科的属于自己“专业槽”,刑法学只有成为“最精确的法律科学”,①才能有自己的核心技术与工艺流程的“专业槽”,只有最精确的刑法学,才能最精当地解决实践中棘手的刑法问题。陈兴良教授和周光权教授合作完成的《刑法学的现代展开》一书正是对此的回应。作者站在时代与学科的前沿,多维度立体式展示了两代刑法学人对超规范的刑法学的基础命题、规范刑法学的前沿问题与实践课题的最新思考,展示了理论“突围”与专业槽建设的努力。突出展示了罪刑法定原则视角转换、死刑问题的观念引领、刑事政策的深刻洞见等内容。全书“充满了人文气息及高度学术性”,是践行刑法学者使命,体现刑法学创新与突围的一部力作。 相似文献
9.
10.
主观主义与中国刑法关系论纲--认真对待刑法主观主义 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
刑法主观主义作为西方刑法学说史上的重要思想,在我国刑法学界的地位却是尴尬的———刑法主观主义往往是作为被批判的对象,其本身所存在的合理内核却被人们所忽视。然而,中国传统法律思想、中国刑事立法的发展以及中国刑法的主客观相统一原则等都与刑法主观主义存在密切的联系,刑法主观主义的合理性不容抹杀,学界需要认真对待刑法主观主义。 相似文献
11.
12.
在刑事法治系统中,立法与司法是两个非常重要的子系统。研究刑法学方法,①对于这两个子系统的良性运转,进而促进刑事法治系统的良性运转,具有重要意义。一立法完善,对于中国刑事法治而言,是一项重要的制度建设工作。二十世纪八十年代以来的刑事立法,始终贯穿着这一主题。(一)立法完善的含义与意义完善之意,指(使之)完备美好。②立法完善,即通过立法程序使法律、法规进一步完备的过程与结果。刑法的立法完善亦然。废除、修改非正当、不合理的规定,增补与社会现实相适应的内容,是刑法立法完善工作的基本方式。制定立法解释,是刑法立法完善工作… 相似文献
13.
Family law professionals should be proactive in seeking and implementing constructive reforms. We identify some successful cutting‐edge reforms: (1) family resource centers, where all kinds of needs can be met; (2) informal family law trials, which streamline clogged calendars and provide an empowering and efficient forum; (3) licensed legal technicians, who increase public access to legal services; and (4) unbundled family law services. Second, we outline a protocol for implementation of reform developed by the Oregon Task Force on Family Law which is effective and replicable. Thoughtful reform of dispute resolution processes will serve family health and promote peace.
- Key Points for the Family Court Community:
- Evolving family constellations, private ordering through pre‐ and postmarital agreements, an increase in self‐represented litigants, and shrinking judicial resources are changing family law dramatically.
- Thoughtful, practical process reforms are needed in order to accommodate these changes.
- Practitioners should be proactive about seeking out and implementing such reforms.
- Some reforms already finding success include family relationship resource centers, informal domestic relations trials, licensed legal technicians, and unbundled legal services.
- We outline a protocol with a proven track record of success for implementing cutting‐edge family law reform.
14.
15.
16.
This paper uses parallels between Sophocles Theban Playsand the House of Lords decision in Dudley and Stephens, to questionthe decision in the Erdemovi case before the International CriminalTribunal for the former Yugoslavia. One should distinguish betweencausal, moral and criminal responsibility. If a man who commitsa crime, not by the action of his free will, is to be foundguilty, we are essentially equating causal responsibility withcriminal guilt. This logic clearly does not correspond withthat of the rest of international criminal law. The storiesof Erdemovi, Oedipus, Dudley and Stephens are tragedies. Eachof the victims/perpetrators felt an overwhelming sense of remorse.Whether they should be considered morally guilty of murder isa matter of individual conscience. The International CriminalTribunal for the Former Yugoslavia majority erred in using anabsolute moral position in Erdemovi. The majority's moral condemnationof the killing of innocents was confused with the question ofwhether Erdemovi should have been criminally punished. The contentof the majority opinion is largely of an irreproachably moralisticnature, though shrouded and mystified by the discussion of precedent.More generally, the decision to try Erdemovi at the InternationalCriminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia was itself self-defeating.Erdemovi should never have stood trial at The Hague. The internationalcommunity should not aid in self-flagellation. While his actionscannot be approved of, they should not be punished internationally.He could have been helped, supported and reintegrated with fargreater benefit to all. Heroesare hard to find in an atmosphere of total terror.1 相似文献
17.
18.
19.
一、2005年刑法学研究概况
(一)2005年以来,刑法学理论创新势头不减,著述丰富.主要个人学术专著有:<受贿罪研究新动向>、<管制刑研究>、<规范刑法原理>、<刑事政策立场与范畴>、<身份犯研究>、<行政刑法学>等等.主要编著有:<中韩刑法基本问题研讨"首届中韩刑法学术研讨会"学术文集>、<惩治恐怖主义犯罪理论与立法>、<中国区际刑法问题专论>、<中国刑法罪刑适用>、<刑事法问题研究>、<刑法总论研究>、<有组织犯罪研究>、<刑事法问题思索与研究>、<刑事一体化与刑事政策>、<惩治恐怖主义犯罪理论与立法>、<犯罪形态研究精要>等等;新译外国刑法著作:<死刑的全球考察>、<德国刑法学总论第1卷犯罪原理的基础构造>等;新译外国法典:<丹麦刑法典与丹麦刑事执行法>、<挪威一般公民刑法典>、<瑞典刑法典>等等.此外,发表的学术论文不啻千篇. 相似文献