构建智能环路监管机制——基于数字金融监管的新挑战

面对金融科技的创新与发展,传统监管机制显现出监管滞后、监管失效等方面的无力和脱节。数字金融监管在风险控制、监管方式、监管模式上面临新挑战,应以科技化监管为核心,借助大数据、人工智能等新型科技手段,实现风险的综合动态监测,推动监管向科技型、统筹型转变。在金融智能监管系统的基础上,构建由事前准入及测试、事中实时动态监测、事后风险处置反馈系统组成的智能环路监管机制。     

监管失灵与市场监管权的重构

从中国市场监管权的制度设计看,明显存在定位模糊、设立缺乏合理考量、配置分散、监管者非专业性等缺陷,实质上是“政企不分”、行政主导的立法模式以及权力文化等体制痼疾在监管法制架构上的一种表象。因此,必须在推进市场化进程和政治改革的过程中,通过厘清政府经济职能、明晰政府经济职权的内涵和范围、重塑监管机构、设计适当的控制机制等路径,实现市场监管权的重构。     

我国慈善组织法治监管创新机制研究——基于香港地区的经验

目前我国內地慈善组织监管错位、监管缺位、监管模式扭曲、监管法治化程度较低等弊端暴露明显,严重挫伤了公民的慈善热情和慈善信心。香港地区的慈善组织法治监管机制在保持慈善界独立自主的同时,确保其受到高效、公平、适度的监管。內地慈善监管问题的解决,可尝试借鉴香港经验,降低监管门槛,设立权威的专门监管机构,明确监管重点,建立科学的监管模式,强化行业自律,完善立法,提高监管的法治化程度,重塑慈善组织的公信力。     

美国律师管理制度对中国的借鉴——以法律服务市场准入为视角

美国的律师管理制度以行业自律为主。美国律师协会在法律服务市场准入中负责制定管理律师的行业规则和纪律。相比之下,中国律师协会的自律管理薄弱,未能在中国法律服务市场准入中发挥主导作用。美国的律师管理制度有许多值得我国借鉴的地方。     

我国食品安全监管问题探析

目前,我国食品安全事故频发,给民众的健康和政府的形象都带来了严重的影响。尽管政府相当重视并加大了监管力度,但收效有限。本文针对我国食品安全监管存在的主要问题以及成因进行分析,从政府监管手段方面提出了相应的解决办法。     

Techniques for evaluating regulatory change

This paper demonstrates the applicability of two empirical techniques—the Heckman two-stage switching regression and the event study methodology—for evaluating regulatory or legislative change relating to companies and in particular to the regulation of company reporting. These techniques measure the impact of regulatory changes once they have happened. They could be used in practice if regulatory changes were subject to a review procedure. The availability of these relatively sophisticated techniques should encourage the quantitative analysis of regulatory changes. Comparisons of effects across member states of the European Union would be interesting but would obviously need care.     

论《食品安全法》对我国食品安全监管体制的影响

近几年来,我国食品安全问题不断,暴露出我国食品安全政府监管体制存在诸多弊端。本文探讨新《食品安全法》出台后,我国食品安全监管在监管体制、食品安全标准、免检制度、监管行为等几个方面的变化以及尚存在的问题。     

俄罗斯金融服务市场监管法律制度评介

俄罗斯金融服务市场监管法律制度承继了前苏联的部分理念和框架,随着自由化和私有化进程的加速,逐渐形成了自己的特色。监管主体以中央银行为核心,联邦金融市场管理局为辅助,同时推动行业自律和社会监督的发展。在法律体系方面以《银行法》、《保险法》和《证券市场法》作为主要规范金融服务市场的依据,其他单行法规和个别部门法中的特殊规定也发挥着调控作用。金融危机之后,俄罗斯金融服务市场的监管法律逐步完善,法律规定比较全面,更加重视消费者权益的保护,但还应继续转变立法理念,加强部门法的协调统一,平衡好国家利益和个人权利的关系。     

政府监管模式类型化分析及启示

在自由市场基础上,政府有限监管的经济模式已成为当今市场经济国家的共同选择趋势,各国政府在依据本国实际需要的基础上形成了各具特色的政府监管模式。监管模式的选择必须与本国国情和实际相符合,对不同国家政府监管模式进行比较分析有助于在不同情况下选择更有效的政府监管模式。     

ADJUDICATING THE REGULATORY PENALTIES AGAINST NONPROFESSIONAL TAXI SERVICES IN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION

This paper provides an overview of judicial decisions on lawsuits against regulatory penalties imposed on nonprofessional taxi drivers and ride-hailing platform operators in China and the European Union (especially Germany). Despite strikingly different facts in these cases, courts in both China and the EU are frequently called upon to rule on similar legal issues, including the applicability of old regulatory rules to new forms of transport services, the regulatory bar for the operation of emerging transport models, and the proper intensity of competition in taxi markets. The comparison of such cases suggests that for deciding the regulatory schemes of the innovative economy of transport services, the judicial system is not better suited than the regulatory system, especially the regulatory authority of the central government. Moreover, an experimental regulatory approach with minimum standards is arguably a feasible option that can fit with the emerging nature of innovative businesses.     

论中央与地方金融监管权配置之优化——以地方性影子银行的监管为视角

近年来,我国各类地方性影子银行的涌现及其引发的诸多地方金融风险事件,使完全依赖中央政府一己之力的垂直监管模式弊端凸现,地方金融监管的补充作用越发明显。长期以来,我国较关注金融监管权在中央部门间的横向配置,对其在中央与地方之间的纵向配置几无触及,导致地方金融监管权的实现只能端赖中央金融监管机构“一事一议”的规章、规范性文件乃至政策的授权方式,缺乏应有的正当性。地方金融办也因此“名不正、言不顺”,普遍存在职能错位、监管权被随意干预和监管资源配备不足等困境。是故,国家应尽早通过更高位阶的立法对“央地”金融监管权的配置加以优化,包括明晰“央地”金融监管边界,一揽子授予地方完整的金融监管权,设置相应的外部监督问责制度,并建立起以国家金融稳定发展委员会为主导的纵向金融监管协调机制,使两者形成监管合力,依法共治。     

中国政府监管机构构建中的缺失与前瞻性思考──兼议政府监管领域"大部门体制"的改革方向

中国目前虽然成立了一些冠以"监管"或"监督管理"之名的机构,但与现代意义上的监管机构还有相当大的差距。中国政府监管机构的设立应坚持"立法先行"的原则,避免"三定方案"带给监管机构的尴尬境地;中国政府监管机构不宜采用美国的独立管制委员会模式或以英国为代表的公法人模式,现阶段比较现实和稳妥的做法是在国家行政体制框架内设置行政机构类型的监管机构,最好采用隶属于国务院的监管机构模式,并通过法律机制保障其独立性;面对产业汇流的趋势,在经济性监管领域,应设立综合性的监管机构。     

市场型金融创新法律监管路径的反思与超越

市场型金融创新凸显了规范与现实之间的冲突。无论是选择性监管路径,还是规则扩张式监管路径,抑或是以监管沙箱为代表的实验式监管路径,都不能很好地解决该冲突。以上三种路径,都是在“术”的层面上展开。为了超越以上三种路径,我国应在“道”的层面上进行理念与制度完善,即我国需要完善金融法治基础,建构金融法治哲学,制定《金融法典》或《金融法总则》,创新金融法的更新机制,创建市场型金融创新合法性裁定制度,完善市场型金融创新的法律责任,以便进一步提升我国对市场型金融创新监管的法治化水平。     

场外衍生品市场监管制度改革:英国的经验与启示

2008年金融危机暴露出全球场外衍生品市场监管制度的缺陷;金融危机后,全球各个国家和经济体都加强了场外衍生品市场监管制度改革。英国是全球最大的场外衍生品交易中心,英国场外衍生品市场监管制度改革措施一定程度上代表或影响着全球场外衍生品市场监管制度改革的趋势。通过分析金融危机前英国场外衍生品市场监管制度的缺陷以及金融危机后英国场外衍生品市场监管制度改革的主要措施,在此基础上提出完善我国场外衍生品市场立法和监管制度的建议。     

食品安全视域下政府监管存在的矛盾及改进策略

目前,突出的食品安全问题与政府管理机制的运行缺陷、内在矛盾有着密切关系。政府在管理职能、管理手段、治理过程、信息传播、法规执行上存在着诸多的问题。因此,厘清矛盾关系,找出监管"失灵"的根源,转变监管理念,调整监管行为,提升监管效能,这样,才能提高政府对食品安全监管的公信力。     

英美国家公用事业监管机构研究及其对我国的启示

公用事业的私营化需要独立的监管机构来维护公共利益和消费者权益,英国和美国公用事业私营化的成功与监管机构的有效运作密不可分。本文总结了英美国家在电信、电力、天然气和水务行业四个有代表性的监管机构在组织立法、机构独立性、权力规范和监管监督方面的共性,以期对我国公用事业改革有所裨益。     

Regulatory Conversations

The article proposes a new site of analysis for the study of regulation: regulatory conversations, and a new theoretical approach: discourse analysis. Regulatory conversations, the communicative interactions that occur between all involved in the regulatory 'space', are an important part of most regulatory systems. Discourse analysis, the study of the use of language and communication, suggests that such interactions are constitutive of the regulatory process, that they serve important functions, that they can be the basis of co-ordinated action, and that they are important sites of conflict and contestation. The article explores five key contentions of discourse analysis, considering how each may shed light on aspects of regulatory processes. These are, first as to the meaning of language and co-ordination of social practices; second, as to the construction of identities; third, the relationship of language, thought, and knowledge; fourth, the relationship of language and power, and finally, that meaning, thought, knowledge, and power are open to contestation and change.     

The Liberalization of the Telecommunications Sector: A Rent-Seeking Perspective

This paper assesses market liberalization in the telecommunications industry from a rent-seeking perspective. Our focus is on United States regulation, with corollary international developments that are spurring competition. The analysis which is general in approach, assesses pervasive government controls which have long shaped the nature of competition in the telecommunication sectors. We find that government has been a means for retarding competition and innovation in the telecommunications sector through the actions of rent-seeking agents. Rapid technological change, however, increasingly is rendering traditional government regulation obsolete. This change is spurring welfare-enhancing competition, regulatory reform, and privatization in the telecommunications sector.     

论行政监管权与法治

行政监管制度在中国建立的十几年间,监管效果并不理想,市场经济和现代监管制度尚未完全建立,监管权力失灵已经开始显现,这种消极现象不可能通过市场经济自身的力量消除,必须遵循法治原则,通过法律对行政权力进行规制。     

An assessment of the proportionality of regulation of ‘over the top’ communications services under Europe's common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services

‘Over the top’ communications services such as Skype and FaceTime are changing the way we communicate, carrying voice and video traffic over the Internet. Unlike traditional mobile and fixed line alternatives, these services fall outside the reach of the common regulatory framework. Whilst an absence of regulation is not appropriate, neither is subjecting these services to the full gamut of regulation the path forward: an analysis of the core elements of the regulatory frameworks reveals that, in respect of data retention and privacy, harmonisation of regulation is appropriate. The remaining challenge is determining whether effective regulation could indeed be imposed on services offered from outside the EU.