职务犯罪适用缓刑问题刍议

对国家工作人员职务犯罪适用缓刑,要严格按照《刑法》第七十二条缓刑条件办理,不具备缓刑条件的不能勉强适用,对缓刑条件不能简单理解。只有正确适用缓刑,才能在改革开放的形势下,既严惩严重破坏经济的罪犯,又对一些犯罪情节较轻,真诚认罪悔罪或自首的犯罪分子,恰当适用缓刑,体现惩办和宽大并举的宽严相济政策,从而使司法审判工作更好地为改革开放、发展经济这一中心服务。     

职务犯罪适用缓刑问题刍议

对国家工作人员职务犯罪适用缓刑,要严格按照《刑法》第七十二条缓刑条件办理,不具备缓刑条件的不能勉强适用,对缓刑条件不能简单理解。只有正确适用缓刑,才能在改革开放的形势下,既严惩严重破坏经济的罪犯,又对一些犯罪情节较轻,真诚认罪悔罪或自首的犯罪分子,恰当适用缓刑,体现惩办和宽大并举的宽严相济政策,从而使司法审判工作更好地为改革开放、发展经济这一中心服务。     

罚金刑缓刑适用条件新论

缓刑制度在实践中对教育和改造犯罪分子,使之改过自新,预防重新犯罪,维护社会稳定等方面发挥了重大作用。因为缓刑的诸多优越性,本文建议增设罚金刑的缓刑,并对罚金刑缓刑的适用条件进行论述。     

试析《刑法修正案(八)》新缓刑制度

结合我国立法、司法实践,对缓刑适用的前提条件、实质条件、排除条件分别予以阐述,以便在司法实践中更准确地把握缓刑制度.     

浅谈缓刑的适用——以二个案例适用缓刑为例

我国《刑法》第72条规定：对于被判处拘役、三年以下有期徒刑的犯罪分子，同时符合下列条件的，可以宣告缓刑，时其中不满十八周岁的人、怀孕的妇女和已满七十五周岁的人，应当宣告缓刑：（一）犯罪情节较轻；（二）有悔罪表现；（三）没有再犯罪的危险；（四）宣告缓刑时所居住社区没有重大不良影响。宣告缓刑，可以根据犯罪情况，同时禁止犯罪分子在缓刑考验期限内从事特定活动，进入特定区域、场所，接触特定的人。第74条规定：对于累犯和犯罪集团的首要分子。不适用缓刑。本文以三个实践中的案例适用缓刑为例，简要分析了缓刑的适用以及条件，是以案说法。     

论检察机关如何加强对法院适用缓刑的监督

随着缓刑适用率的逐渐提高,缓刑适用过程中存在的如决策程序透明度不高、考察机制不到位、不规范等问题应予以重视。文章从基层法院适用缓刑的现状及存在的问题入手,探讨检察机关加强对审判环节中法院决定适用缓刑的监督的方法途径。可从事前、事中、事后三个节点即加强法院适用缓刑的监督,事前监督即延伸事前监督,增设有检察机关参与的缓刑听证制度;事中监督即重视事中监督,发挥检察机关缓刑量刑建议的作用;事后监督即强化事后监督,对适用缓刑不当的判决适时进行抗诉,使缓刑制度能在实践中得到更好的发挥。     

检察机关对缓刑适用的法律监督之刍议

刑罚执行监督是国家赋予检察机关法律监督职责的重要内容。目前,检察机关在对我国缓刑适用的法律监督方面,存在诸多问题,使得缓刑适用的实效大打折扣。要使缓刑制度在我国真正发挥其积极作用,就必须在完善相关法律规定的基础上,对法官的自由裁量权加以制约,完善相关部门的联系配合制度,使检察机关对缓刑适用的法律监督职责得到真正有效发挥。     

未成年人刑事处罚分流制度研究

未成年人分流基于宜教不宜罚等理念,以便捷的非正式程序来替代繁琐的正式程序,解决情节轻微的未成年人犯罪与偏差问题,降低少年司法体系之正式干预,从而减少或避免问题少年标签化、促其改造自新及复归社会。本文分析总结了未成年人分流概念、特征、作用及历史沿革;未成年人分流类型;未成年人分流适用对象、条件及依据等内容。在此基础上,客观评析目前我国未成年人分流立法及司法实践中存在的问题并提出相应的完善建议。     

未成年罪犯适用缓刑存在的问题与对策

对未成年人犯罪从宽处罚是各国刑事立法普遍的选择,对需要判刑的未成年罪犯尽可能适用缓刑是从宽处罚的表现之一。因此,未成年罪犯缓刑的立法状况和司法效果如何,是检验一个国家未成     

对我国缓刑制度适用条件的细化思考

缓刑制度能够有利于对罪犯实行矫正,促使缓刑犯早日回归社会,但是从我国缓刑制度适用的现状来看,还有许多不尽如人意的地方。笔者试图对我国缓刑制度的适用进行进一步细化,以期使缓刑制度的作用得到最大限度的发挥。     

Impacts of Juvenile Probation Training Models on Youth Recidivism

Probation and parole case managers in 12 field offices of a state juvenile justice agency took part in a controlled experiment aimed at advancing knowledge on implementing evidence-based practices in juvenile assessment, treatment planning, and placement. Employing stratification and random assignment, case managers in four of the offices were assigned to a control/no training condition and case managers in the other eight offices took part in an initial training and two follow-up sessions on research-based supervision practices. In four of these offices, training was enhanced by the inclusion of peer coaches who provided internal support for practice implementation. Consistent with other ongoing research that shows improved organizational functioning in the enhanced training sites, logistic and Cox regression results on 1,518 youth in two follow-up cohorts tracked over 12?months indicate those supervised in the enhanced sites show a pattern of reduced recidivism compared to those in the standard and control sites.     

A 21st Century Developmentally Appropriate Juvenile Probation Approach

Principles of adolescent development have accelerated positive changes to the juvenile justice system. These changes have been most pronounced in reducing reliance on incarceration and in approaches to sentencing of youth tried as adults. While juvenile probation has made some developmentally friendly adjustments, it remains an area that is fertile for reform. Many of the principles and goals in this paper have been endorsed by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ), which “supports and is committed to juvenile probation systems that conform to the latest knowledge of adolescent development and adolescent brain science,” and which “recommends that courts cease imposing ‘conditions of probation’ and instead support probation departments’ developing, with families and youth, individualized case plans that set expectations and goals.” 1 NCJFCJ's July, 2017 resolution in support of developmentally appropriate juvenile probation services built on earlier NCJFCJ policies. From the time NCJFCJ adopted Juvenile Delinquency Guidelines in 2005, those policies have grown increasingly robust. 2