多重置换扩增技术用于法医学微量DNA检测效果

目的探讨多重置换扩增(MDA)技术对法医学微量DNA样品STR检测分型的效果。方法用MDA技术对不同模板量DNA进行全基因组扩增(WGA),扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用Profiler PlusTM试剂盒检测基因型。结果该方法可对模板DNA增加104～106倍。1ng样品DNA的MDA产物可获得9个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的准确分型结果;低于0.1ng的样品DNA经MDA扩增后,基因座检出数增加,但可见等位基因不平衡或丢失现象。结论MDA技术可有效增加DNA模板量和提高微量DNA分型效果。但样品DNA量低于0.1ng时,MDA产物的STR分型结果判读须慎重。     

多重置换扩增技术用于法医学微量DNA检测效果

目的探讨多重置换扩增（MDA）技术对法医学微量DNA样品STR检测分型的效果。方法用MDA技术对不同模板量DNA进行全基因组扩增（WGA）．扩增产物用实时荧光定量PCR技术定量、用Prrfiler Plus^TM试剂盒检测基因型。结果该方法可对模板DNA增加10^4～10^6倍。1ng样品DNA的MDA产物可获得9个STR基因座和Amelogenin性别基因座的准确分型结果；低于0．1ng的样品DNA经MDA扩增后，基因座检出数增加。但可见等位基因不平衡或丢失现象。结论MDA技术可有效增加DNA模板量和提高微量DNA分型效果。但样品DNA量低于0．1ng时，MDA产物的STR分型结果判读须慎重。     

全基因组扩增法应用于低拷贝数DNA检测

目的建立基于多重置换扩增(MDA)技术的全基因组扩增(WGA)方法,实现对低拷贝数(LCN)DNA样品进行分析。方法采用REPLI-g试剂盒对样本进行等温全基因组扩增,扩增产物采用ProfilerPlus试剂盒确定样本的十个STR基因座的等位基因型。结果10pgDNA模板经全基因组扩增后,能够进行DNA分型。结论全基因组扩增可以用于LCN的DNA分析,帮助提高微量物证的检出成功率。     

水浸和洗涤血样本的DNA检验

目的对经水作用的血样本DNA分型检验结果进行分析探讨。方法全血样本分为两组,水稀释组用水将全血样本稀释5、10、20、25、30倍后制作血斑;洗涤组分为纯水手洗、肥皂弱洗、肥皂强洗、84消毒液浸洗和洗衣粉机洗等5种洗涤方式。所有样本用IQ试剂盒提取DNA,Identifiler PlusTM试剂盒扩增,并进行分型检测。结果血液稀释组中心部位检材,均无等位基因丢失,除30倍稀释样本外,峰高均衡性均大于70%;外周部位检材出现2～10个等位基因丢失,峰高均衡性均小于50%。洗涤组中除84消毒液洗涤样本未检出DNA谱带外,其余均无等位基因丢失,而峰高及均衡性以手洗和肥皂弱洗样本更好。结论经水稀释或洗涤剂清洗的血样本,即使联苯胺预实验结果为阴性,选取合适的检验部位,仍可获得DNA分型。     

不同织物上血斑洗涤后DNA检验结果分析

目的分析评价织物上洗涤过的血斑DNA检验的效果。方法取棉、化纤和麻布块各25份,用40μL新鲜血均匀涂制成直径约1.5cm的圆形血斑,样本分为5组,分别在加有皂粉的洗衣机中洗涤1、3、10、30、60min;所有样本用IQ试剂盒提取DNA,用Identifiler PlusTM试剂盒扩增,并进行STR分型检测。结果各种载体血斑周边处检材中,仅棉布载体洗涤1min检材检出RFU200的峰,但等位基因丢失率可达50%以上,不能正确判型。各种载体血斑检材洗涤30min以内均可得到成功分型,但峰高以棉布最高、化纤最低,洗涤60min时仅棉布血斑检出率为100%,其他载体血斑均有明显的等位基因丢失及非特异性扩增,检出率低于60%。结论洗涤一定时间后的血迹仍具有DNA分型检验的价值,能否正确提取洗涤后的血迹检材是分型成功的关键,洗涤时间较长的检材判型应谨慎。     

MPure-12全自动核酸纯化仪与Chelex-100法的比较CSCD

目的通过对DNA含量不同的血痕和多种类型生物学检材进行DNA提取和STR分型检测,探讨MPure-12全自动核酸纯化仪(MPure-12法)在DNA提取中的法医学应用价值。方法收集血痕、精斑、唾液等9种类型的生物学检材,应用MPure-12法和传统Chelex-100法提取DNA,经过PCR扩增和电泳,获取STR分型图谱。结果 MPure-12法对发根、口香糖、烟蒂、肌肉组织、唾液斑、血痕、精斑这些检材能够成功分型,唾液出现了个别等位基因丢失现象,接触拭子分型较差。Chelex-100法对血量为20μL、15μL、10μL、5μL、1μL制成的血痕均有完整分型结果,MPure-12法在血量为1μL时出现等位基因丢失现象。结论 MPure-12法适用于一定浓度血样的检验,而对于微量血样,Chelex-100法提取DNA的效果可能更优。仪器应用于DNA提取具有操作简单、快速、提取效率高,分型成功率高,减少人为污染等优势。     

MPure-12全自动核酸纯化仪与Chelex-100法的比较

目的通过对DNA含量不同的血痕和多种类型生物学检材进行DNA提取和STR分型检测,探讨MPure-12全自动核酸纯化仪(MPure-12法)在DNA提取中的法医学应用价值。方法收集血痕、精斑、唾液等9种类型的生物学检材,应用MPure-12法和传统Chelex-100法提取DNA,经过PCR扩增和电泳,获取STR分型图谱。结果 MPure-12法对发根、口香糖、烟蒂、肌肉组织、唾液斑、血痕、精斑这些检材能够成功分型,唾液出现了个别等位基因丢失现象,接触拭子分型较差。Chelex-100法对血量为20μL、15μL、10μL、5μL、1μL制成的血痕均有完整分型结果,MPure-12法在血量为1μL时出现等位基因丢失现象。结论 MPure-12法适用于一定浓度血样的检验,而对于微量血样,Chelex-100法提取DNA的效果可能更优。仪器应用于DNA提取具有操作简单、快速、提取效率高,分型成功率高,减少人为污染等优势。     

免疫磁珠法分离混合样本中血液成分的探究

目的 基于免疫磁珠法分离脱落上皮细胞中的白细胞，消除或减弱混合检材中血液来源STR分型对结果分析的干扰。方法 分别取两名不同个体的血液和口腔脱落上皮细胞，按不同比例制备成混合样本作为实验组，并同时制备细胞量相等的对照组。应用免疫磁珠法分离实验组样本中白细胞，并与对照组以相同条件进行DNA提取、扩增、分型，对比两组STR分型结果。结果 当血液量较少时，对照组为混合STR分型，经免疫磁珠法分离混合检材中白细胞后，实验组为单一来源STR分型；当血液量较多时，此时对照组为混合STR分型，但口腔脱落上皮细胞来源的STR分型谱带峰高较低甚至丢失，经免疫磁珠法后，实验组仍为STR混合分型，但口腔脱落上皮细胞来源的STR分型谱带成为主峰；当混合样本中口腔脱落上皮细胞微量，血液占比极大时，此时对照组为血液来源的单一STR分型结果，经免疫磁珠法后，实验组为STR混合分型，包含口腔脱落上皮细胞来源的所有等位基因分型。结论 该方法可用于分离脱落上皮细胞中血液成分，降低血液来源的DNA比例，能够改善此类混合检材中目的细胞的STR分型结果，为刑事案件中含有血迹浸染的混合生物检材的检验提供了一种新思路。     

Profiler Plus试剂盒扩增Amelogenin基因座变异1例

目的探讨日常检案及DNA数据库建设中常用的ProfilerPlus系统扩增法医生物检材可能出现的变异情况。方法分别采用ProfilerPlus试剂盒扩增、毛细管电泳分析及Amelogenin单基因座扩增、银染技术分型两种方法分别检测两份血痕的基因型。结果应用ProfilerPlus试剂盒扩增、毛细管电泳分析发现X-Y同源Amelogenin基因座的X片段丢失,而运用Amelogenin单基因座扩增、银染技术分型则X片段正常出现。结论应用ProfilerPlus系统分析法医生物检材,有可能出现等位基因丢失现象,此现象需要引起我们在日常检案及DNA数据库建设中的足够重视。     

微量DNA的短串联重复序列分型可行性

目的了解微量DNA分型的法医学应用的可行性。方法一系列浓度的DNA模板用PowerPlexTM16System试剂盒扩增,并用ABI377DNA测序仪进行短串联重复序列(STR)的分型。结果当模板量小于250pg时,部分位点发生了等位基因漏扩,并出现非特异带、杂合子扩增不平衡等干扰分型的杂峰。结论上述这些不正常的现象可能会导致分型错误。在对微量检材的DNA检验结果进行判型时一定要小心谨慎,全面考虑。     

Direct STR amplification from whole blood and blood- or saliva-spotted FTA without DNA purification

The DNA purification step has been thought to be essential for typing of STR DNA. However, this process is time-consuming, and there is a risk of unexpected cross-contamination during purification. We report a new method for direct short tandem repeat (STR) amplification using a newly developed direct PCR buffer, AnyDirect, which can amplify STR loci from whole blood and blood- or saliva-spotted FTA cards without DNA purification. The autosomal and Y chromosomal STR loci were analyzed for whole blood and blood or saliva spots of random individuals, followed by comparison of the results with those of corresponding purified DNA. The results from whole blood and blood spots showed perfect concordance with those from purified DNA without allele or locus drop-out. However, in the case of saliva spots, no amplification or locus drop-out was observed in some of the samples, which offers a topic for further study. Additionally, some commercial hot-start DNA polymerases other than AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase were also found to be compatible with this buffer system. Therefore, this direct PCR buffer was demonstrated to be useful for fast forensic DNA analysis or criminal DNA databases for which there is no need to store DNA samples.     

Whole-genome amplification by MDA to improve sensitivity of forensic expert examination of chromosomal DNA

This pilot project has the objective to evaluate the possibility of application of the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) technique to whole-genome amplification with a view to improving sensitivity of molecular-genetic test-systems. Preparations of total cellular DNA were amplified by MDA and analysed to assess conserved specificity of chromosomal DNA and its enhanced template activity in the standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for typing allele variants of polymorphous DNA loci. DNA samples before and after MDA showed virtually identical genotypic combinations of alleles. Allele fragments were stably detected at a level of DNA 4-5 times lower than in the standard test. The results of the study indicate that the MDA technique provides a promising tool to improve reliability of forensic- expert examination of chromosomal DNA and imply the necessity to further develop forensic-medical aspects of this method.     

Extended PCR conditions to reduce drop-out frequencies in low template STR typing including unequal mixtures

Forensic laboratories employ various approaches to obtain short tandem repeat (STR) profiles from minimal traces (<100 pg DNA input). Most approaches aim to sensitize DNA profiling by increasing the amplification level by a higher cycle number or enlarging the amount of PCR products analyzed during capillary electrophoresis. These methods have limitations when unequal mixtures are genotyped, since the major component will be over-amplified or over-loaded. This study explores an alternative strategy for improved detection of the minor components in low template (LT) DNA typing that may be better suited for the detection of the minor component in mixtures. The strategy increases the PCR amplification efficiency by extending the primer annealing time several folds. When the AmpF?STR^® Identifiler^® amplification parameters are changed to an annealing time of 20 min during all 28 cycles, the drop-out frequency is reduced for both pristine DNA and single or multiple donor mock case work samples. In addition, increased peak heights and slightly more drop-ins are observed while the heterozygous peak balance remains similar as with the conventional Identifiler protocol. By this extended protocol, full DNA profiles were obtained from only 12 sperm heads (which corresponds to 36 pg of DNA) that were collected by laser micro dissection. Notwithstanding the improved detection, allele drop-outs do persist, albeit in lower frequencies. Thus a LT interpretation strategy such as deducing consensus profiles from multiple independent amplifications is appropriate. The use of extended PCR conditions represents a general approach to improve detection of unequal mixtures as shown using four commercially available kits (AmpF?STR^® Identifiler, SEfiler Plus, NGM and Yfiler). The extended PCR protocol seems to amplify more of the molecules in LT samples during PCR, which results in a lower drop-out frequency.     

PEP-PCR法及其在法医学中应用的可行性研究

提高微量检材的利用率 ,建立PEP方法并对其法医学应用进行可行性研究。用 15个随机寡核苷酸的序列作为引物 ,低特异性下扩增出微量DNA ,以此扩增物作为模扳 ,进行特异基因座扩增。经PMCT118,GABAR ,DYS19,D18S849,D3S1744,D12S10 90 ,D8S1179,D2 1S11,D18S5 1,D5S818,D13S3 17,D7S82 0 ,D3S13 5 8,vWA ,FGA ,TH0 1,CSF1PO ,TPOX ,D16S5 3 9及Amelogene等 2 0个基因座的PEP PCR与直接的PCR分析比较 ,二者分型结果一致 ,即使 1ngDNA也能得到正确分型。PEP方法可用于法医学检验 ,有利于微量物证的利用 ,使物证检材提供尽可能多的信息     

车辆内接触DNA检测方法的分析比较

目的探讨汽车内接触DNA的分离方法及遗传标记分型效率。方法收集单人长期驾驶的11辆小型轿车,采用粘取法和擦拭法富集方向盘、变速杆和手刹三个部位的脱落细胞,采用磁珠法和硅胶膜法提取基因组DNA,采用GoldenEye^TM 20A和PowerPlex■Fusion进行扩增,并对检验结果进行比较分析。结果方向盘在基因座分型正确率、等位基因drop-in和drop-out基因座比率、单基因座正确率以及单基因座等位基因drop-in和drop-out率六个方面均表现最好,其次为变速杆,最差为手刹;擦拭法和粘取法之间DNA提取在获得的DNA总量和STR检测正确成功率方面无统计学差异;PPFusion与20A的总体基因座分型比较正确率无差异,但单基因座正确率优于20A,drop-out发生率低于20A,drop-in发生率高于20A。结论汽车内脱落细胞的检测可优先采集方向盘部位,根据载体质地选择擦拭法或粘取法采集脱落细胞,选用硅胶膜法或磁珠法提取DNA,PPFusion和20A两个试剂盒均可,分析结果时需特别注意drop-in和drop-out。     

05式警用转轮手枪弹壳接触DNA检验方法的比较

目的比较05式警用转轮手枪弹壳表面接触性DNA检验方法,为实际检验提供参考和借鉴。方法制备40例击发后手枪弹壳的模拟样本,分别用两步转移法提取弹壳表面不同部位检材,采用两种DNA提取法和两种扩增试剂盒对样本进行STR分型检验,比较评价检验结果。结果避开发射药残留区域采用两步转移法提取样本,有助于提高检出率;Chelex-100联合Microcon-100法提取模板DNA的产量最高可达1.18ng,高于Mini M48试剂盒法(0.91ng);MiniFilerTM试剂盒的等位基因检出率(23.61%)高于IdentifilerTM试剂盒(6.41%)。结论采用选择适当区域提取检材,采用Chelex-100联合Microcon-100法提取DNA,经MiniFilerTM试剂盒扩增,进行弹壳接触DNA分型的效果较好。     

Higher Capillary Electrophoresis Injection Settings as an Efficient Approach to Increase the Sensitivity of STR Typing

Abstract:  Evidentiary traces may contain low quantities of DNA, and regularly incomplete short tandem repeat (STR) profiles are obtained. In this study, higher capillary electrophoresis injection settings were used to efficiently improve incomplete STR profiles generated from low-level DNA samples under standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions. The method involves capillary electrophoresis with higher injection voltage and extended injection time. STR peak heights increased six-fold. Inherent to the analysis of low-level DNA samples, we observed stochastic amplification artifacts, mainly in the form of allele dropout and heterozygous peak imbalance. Increased stutter ratios and allele drop-in were rarely seen. Upon STR typing of 10:1 admixed samples, the profile of the major component did not become overloaded when using higher injection settings as was observed upon elevated cycling. Thereby an improved profile of the minor component was obtained. For low-level DNA casework samples, we adhere to independent replication of the PCR amplification and boosted capillary electrophoresis.     

Evaluation of ABO and Lewis genotypes using primer extension preamplification

There are some difficulties with blood typing from ABO variant bloodstains and Lewis negative samples using serologic methods. In these samples, DNA analysis should be employed simultaneously to avoid errors in typing. Primer extension preamplification (PEP) produces copies of template DNA. The minimum quantity to examine nucleotide substitutions of ABO and Lewis genotypes by PCR ranged from 1 to 3 ng DNA. The PCR products with or without PEP treatment showed identical ABO and Lewis genotyping results. Performing both serologic and PCR testing served to crosscheck the ABO and Lewis grouping of such specimens. Errors in ABO and Lewis typing can be avoided as discrepancies are investigated further. The application of the PEP method to limited amounts of DNA samples for ABO and Lewis blood groupings is useful.     

Recovery of genomic DNA from archived PCR product mixes for subsequent multiplex amplification and typing of additional loci: forensic significance for older unsolved criminal cases

A method for genomic DNA recovery from different types of PCR product mixes suitable for multiplex amplification and typing using the Profiler Plus STR typing system has been investigated. The application of this method is of significance in cases where the original DNA samples have been exhausted due to repeated typing analyses in an effort to maximize their evidentiary value. Such cases typically involve samples analyzed using the available DNA typing systems of the time which gave a markedly lower power of discrimination, either alone or in combination, compared to that of modern multiplex STR typing systems. It was found that an effective method for recovering genomic DNA from HLA-DQA1 +PM and CTT triplex amplification mixes, suitable for reproducible achievement of the complete Profiler Plus profile, involved the use of Amicon Microcon-100 microconcentrators. Interestingly, this method was not required to achieve the complete nine STR profile using D1S80 amplification mixes.     

Establishing an integrated pipeline for automatic and efficient detection of trace DNA encountered in forensic applications

The analysis of trace DNA is a crucial component in forensic applications. Biological materials containing low-level DNA collected at crime scenes, such as fingerprints, can be valuable as evidence. Automatic detection of biological samples has been largely embraced in forensic applications to meet the increasing throughput requirements. However, the amount of DNA automatically retrieved from trace evidence often tends to be small and unstable, ultimately resulting in poor detection of DNA profiles. Thus, in this work, we introduced a robust DNA extraction and purification platform named Bionewtech® BN3200 (Bionewtech®, Shanghai, China) with the goal of constructing a rapid automatic detection system for trace DNA. The establishment of automatic detection system for trace DNA mainly encompassed two parts: assessing the sensitivity of automatic extraction platform and screening the optimal short tandem repeat (STR) typing kit. The sensitivity of Bionewtech® BN3200 platform based on Ultra-sensitive DNA Extraction kit was initially estimated, demonstrating that this extraction platform might contain large potential in the trace DNA extraction. For the amplification part, three sets of commercial multiplex STR typing kits were selected as candidates, and the amplified products were further genotyped on the Applied Biosystems 3500xl Genetic Analyzer. After comparation, SiFa™ 23 Plex Kit was determined as the most suitable amplification system for trace DNA. Eventually, the newly exploited trace DNA detection system was successfully implemented in the detection of fingerprints derived from glass surfaces with the five-seconds contact time. As a result, the DNA recovered from the fingerprints fluctuated approximately from 57.60 pg to 18.05 ng, in addition, over 70% of the total STR loci were detected in 75% of the fingerprint samples.