共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
Bo Rothstein 《Scandinavian political studies》1992,15(3):173-191
The question addressed in this article is how to explain major intentional changes in national political systems. The theoretical point of departure is that political systems are usually so tightly structured that the prospects of actors introducing such changes are very small. The argument put forward is that only under certain periods of crisis can such changes occur; it is only during such formative moments that political actors change the institutional parameters or the nature of the 'game'. Empirically, the article extends this argument in an attempt to explain why Sweden's political system became highly corporatist. It has been shown that from a rationalistic approach, collective action - e. g. why individuals join and support interest organizations - is difficult to explain. Instead, an institutional explanation is offered. The empirical analysis shows how centrally placed politicians in Sweden during the 1930s, by changing the payoffs, could solve the 'free-rider' problem for both farmers' and workers' interest organizations. Contrary to earlier studies, the analysis shows that the breakthrough of corporatist principles in Swedish politics took place under a Liberal government strongly supported by the Conservative Party. The traditional connection between the Swedish Social Democrats and the corporatist nature of Swedish politics is thus questioned and the alliance between the Social Democrats and the Farmers' League in 1933 is given a new explanation. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
Philip Perlmutter 《Society》2009,46(6):517-521
Though prejudice and discrimination exist in America, it has been steadily declining and measurably so. From our very beginnings,
there has been a diversity, accretion, succession, and simultaneity of racial, religious, ethnic, and gender victims and victimizers.
Fortunately, there has also been a process of meliorism, epitomized by the presidential election of a black American of mixed
racial parents—Barack Hussein Obama. Regardless of their group identity, today’s generation of Americans has less victims
or victimizers and has more social, political, and economic opportunities than their parents. grandparents, and predecessors
had. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
Randall G. Shelden 《政策研究评论》2004,21(1):5-12
This article provides an overview of recent trends in imprisonment rates in America and introduces the articles in this issue of The Review of Policy Research. Incarceration rates have increased by more than 500 percent since the early 1970s and have now reached a rate of almost 700, higher than anywhere else in the world. The impact has been particularly hard on racial minorities, especially women (whose incarceration rate went from around 8 in 1975 to 59 in 2001). The “war on drugs” has been one of the main reasons behind the increases in imprisonment, along with the more general “get tough on crime” movement that began in the late 1970s. The articles in this issue center around how this recent trend in incarceration impacts the entire society, but especially poor communities. Several of the articles focus on race, age and gender as important variables, in addition to the tendency of the parole system to sort of “recycle” released prisoners back into the prison system. 相似文献
12.
13.
Richard S. Katz 《European Journal of Political Research》2000,38(7&8):552-556
14.
Richard S. Katz 《European Journal of Political Research》2001,40(3-4):447-457
15.
European Journal of Political Research - 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
Richard S. Katz 《European Journal of Political Research》2001,40(7&8):447-457
19.
20.