共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Kamaleswar Bhattacharya 《Journal of Indian Philosophy》1994,22(4):391-393
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Richard Moorhead 《International Journal of the Legal Profession》1994,1(1):127-128
Indexing Legal Materials E. M. Moys (Ed.) London, Society of Indexers, 1993 86 pp., £8.00 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Michael Stolleis 《Ratio juris》2003,16(2):266-280
Abstract. Judicial review ( richterliches Prüfungsrecht ), administrative review ( Verwaltungsgerichtbarkeit ), and constitutional review ( Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit ) are three different ways in which the judiciary has sought to control the executive and legislative powers of the state. Historically and functionally they are closely linked. I intend to discuss them in their German context, focussing, in particular, on the Weimar Republic, that is to say, on the period between 1919 and 1932. Although I shall not be addressing the highly interesting parallels with the U.S. Supreme Court, or with the comparable courts in Italy, France, and, especially, Austria, I should like to invite attention to them, for there is really no Sonderweg in Germany as far as these developments are concerned. 相似文献
19.
对行政复议书面审查方式的异议 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
《行政复议法》规定的复议审查方式是书面审查原则。这一原则与公开性、行政争讼性都是不一致的,而且,书面审查并不能保证查清案件事实,也缺乏相应的档案制度、证据制度的支持。建议修改这一法律规定,使书面与非书面审查方式并存,由当事人和复议机构选择决定,非书面审查方式应增加开庭式、听证式,以补听取意见形式的不足,并建立健全行政执法档案制度和行政证据的法律制度。 相似文献
20.