France and the International Financial Crisis: The Legacy of State‐Led Finance

Despite the far‐reaching liberalization of the French banking system over the past quarter century, French banks suffered far less in the international financial crisis (2007–2009) than banks in the United Kingdom and Germany. However, the French system also suffered far more—at least in the first stages of the crisis—than the banking systems of Southern Europe. By several measures, French banks were world leaders in financial innovation, and the French banking system was highly exposed to international market movements. The limited impact of the crisis, however, owed to the specificities of French “market‐based banking.” Deliberate state action over the two decades prior to the crisis created a specific kind of banking system and encouraged forms of financial innovation, the unintentional consequence of which was the limited exposure to the securitization that caused the damage wrought during the financial crisis.     

后金融危机时代的中国国家安全

深刻认识国际金融危机的时代特征,科学分析国际金融危机对我国国家安全的复杂影响,准确把握后金融危机时代我国国家安全面临的机遇,正确应对国家政治、经济、社会、外交、国防等领域面对的新挑战,对于我国经济在未来更长时期内持续稳定快速发展,实现全面建设小康社会目标具有重要意义.     

国际金融危机下劳资关系利益均衡路径分析

自2008年下半年以来,国际金融危机对我国经济发展的不利影响开始逐步显现,从目前来看,这场国际金融危机还在蔓延和深化,国际金融市场仍处于动荡之中,全球实体经济受到的影响日益显现,世界经济增长明显减速。受其影响,我国经济运行也面临很多困难,未来一个时期,经济社会发展的总体环境将可能更加严峻。面对当前严峻复杂的国内外经济形势,如何处理当前的劳资关系问题,保持劳资关系的利益平衡,的确给工会带来了很大的挑战。     

Multilevel Governance and Business Interests in the European Union

The article analyzes how business interests responded to European integration. It draws on survey data of eight hundred German, French, British, and European Union (EU) trade associations as well as thirty-four large firms. The argument is that the multilevel governance approach to European integration captures the realities of EU interest intermediation better than neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism. The article suggests that the strategies of interest organizations depend mainly on their location in the EU multilevel system and on their governance capacities. I distinguish two kinds of governance capacities: negotiation capacities and organizational resources. The analysis proceeds in the following steps: After outlining the three theories of European integration and presenting their implications for interest groups, a brief overview of the relative importance for interest organizations of EU and national institutions over time is provided. Then, cluster analysis techniques serve to identify types of interest groups according to their lobbying strategies in the multilevel system: niche organizations, occasional players, traditionalists, EU players, and multilevel players are distinguished. The composition of these clusters and the characteristics of their members support the multilevel governance approach and indicate that multilevel players have greater governance capacities than organizations in the other clusters.     

国际金融危机以来法国劳工社会抗议事件研究及其对中国社会治理之启示

党的十九届四中全会重点研究了国家治理体系与治理能力现代化的重大课题.社会抗议事件是剖析一个国家治理问题的重要方面.自2008年国际金融危机以来,国际上劳工社会抗议事件日趋增多.本文选择老牌西方发达国家——法国的劳工社会抗议事件①作为研究对象,总结出法国社会抗议事件可分为"有组织"与"无组织"两类的特征,深入分析引发社会抗议事件的内在原因,并结合中国当前社会治理中的一些问题,提出相关启示与思考.     

国际金融危机条件下工会维护破产企业职工权益的路径选择——大连开发区总工会处理日资企业“旭染织”破产案的启示

2008年,由美国“次贷危机”所导致的国际金融危机席卷全球,我国的实体经济也受到严重冲击,由此而衍生的企业欠薪问题、职工的安置问题、职工再就业问题直接影响广大职工的切身利益,并对工会维权工作提出严峻挑战。     

新自由主义与阿根廷金融危机

本文重点分析了新自由主义的实质以及它对阿根廷经济所造成的危害,提出了必须从本国国情出发合理利用国家的经济职能,而不能完全听任市场和外资去主宰本国经济的中肯建议.     

公共利益:服务型社会治理模式的核心价值

服务型社会治理模式与以往统治型和管理型社会治理模式的根本不同在于,前者是建立在“公共利益”核 心价值基础之上。服务型社会治理模式中公共利益的实现途径:以政治制度化作保障;政府建设植入新公共服务理念;培 育伦理性的公共行政文化;构建共同治理的社会机制。     

新自由主义与国际金融危机——西方国家思想界的反思与评析

本文从五个方面分析了西方国家思想界对新自由主义与国际金融危机的反思与评析,梳理了二者的内在关联:新自由主义缘起与发展于滞涨危机与社会主义受挫,并孕育了但又无法挽救当前的国际金融危机,其结果是危及自身.     

Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy

What makes a well‐functioning governmental crisis management system, and how can this be studied using an organization theory–based approach? A core argument is that such a system needs both governance capacity and governance legitimacy. Organizational arrangements as well as the legitimacy of government authorities will affect crisis management performance. A central argument is that both structural features and cultural context matter, as does the nature of the crisis. Is it a transboundary crisis? How unique is it, and how much uncertainty is associated with it? The arguments are substantiated with empirical examples and supported by a literature synthesis, focusing on public administration research. A main conclusion is that there is no optimal formula for harmonizing competing interests and tensions or for overcoming uncertainty and ambiguous government structures. Flexibility and adaptation are key assets, which are constrained by the political, administrative, and situational context. Furthermore, a future research agenda is indicated.     

Governance in Crisis and withering of the welfare state: the legacy of the policy sciences

The introductory essay to this special issue on Governance in Crisis has three objectives. Firstly, it tries to show that current dilemmas of governance in advanced industrial Western nations can be analysed within the common framework of the thesis of the withering of the modern welfare state. Secondly, it argues that the policy sciences have a legacy of problem-oriented and value-conscious scholarship, bestowed by Lasswell and others, which can and should be taken up in the analysis of the comprehensive problems of governance confronting advanced industrial nations. Thirdly, it considers the requirement that the policy sciences go significantly beyond a managerial perspective and take up the timely but challenging task of linking up problem-orientation to contextuality. Contributions to this issue are seen to constitute a promising step in this direction.     

The Bureaucratic Approach to the Financial Revolution: Japan's Ministry of Finance and Financial System Reform

While all industrialized countries have enacted financial reforms over the past decade, Japan's Ministry of Finance (MoF) officials have crafted a distinctive approach to reform. They have managed to pursue their own agenda while at the same time responding to international market pressures and domestic political demands. This article examines Japan's "financial system reform," the process by which the MoF has recast the regulatory barriers between different types of financial institutions, such as banks and securities houses. Financial system reform represents an extreme case of a common Japanese policy pattern—the bureaucratic-led bargain—in which Japan's bureaucrats, rather than its politicians, organize the bargains that eventually emerge as policy. Two ministry policy councils deliberated for seven years before the Diet passed comprehensive reform legislation in 1992, and the ministry continues to redefine the reform at the stage of implementation today. While MoF officials have been forced to make concessions to industry groups and to adjust to unforeseen developments along the way, they have maintained overall control of the reform process. In fact, this article suggests that they have been remarkably successful in promoting their own peculiar interpretation of the public interest and in preserving and, in some cases, enhancing their own power.     

Reforming the Westminster Model of Agency Governance: Britain and Ireland After the Crisis

Conventional understandings of what the Westminster model implies anticipate reliance on a top‐down, hierarchical approach to budgetary accountability, reinforced by a post–New Public Management emphasis on recentralizing administrative capacity. This article, based on a comparative analysis of the experiences of Britain and Ireland, argues that the Westminster model of bureaucratic control and oversight itself has been evolving, hastened in large part due to the global financial crisis. Governments have gained stronger controls over the structures and practices of agencies, but agencies are also key players in securing better governance outcomes. The implication is that the crisis has not seen a return to the archetypal command‐and‐control model, nor a wholly new implementation of negotiated European‐type practices, but rather a new accountability balance between elements of the Westminster system itself that have not previously been well understood.     

再综合化：常态与应急态协同治理制度体系研究

基于社会形态特征的学理性分析以及常态和应急态下的治理行为特性比较研究发现,协同治理理论框架是实现跨阶段协同的重要基点,需要围绕多主体之间的信息共享、协同决策、协同规则、协同行动、监测评估等过程要素进行系统建设。要做好顶层设计,建立多要素多环节多情景的协同治理结构;深化结构性改革,完善政府组织制度体系;深化放管服改革,以健全机制为抓手加快制度性协同创新;强化制度保障体系建设,为协同治理赋能;建设"五位一体"的社会协同体系。     

公共危机治理中政企协同研究

公共危机有效治理需要社会参与。企业作为市场经济的主体,在公共危机治理中发挥着重要的作用,拥有不可忽视的能量。政府与企业的各自诉求构成两者互动的基础,两者优势资源互补构成完善政企协同的前提。但是,两者都需要转变观念,政府更需要完善法律制度建设,需要鼓励企业发展应急产业。企业应该增强社会责任感,加强合作应急能力建设,才能推动两者和谐互动,开创公共危机治理新局面。     

金融危机与盎格鲁-撒克逊模式的衰落

由美国次贷危机引发的金融危机,终止了20世纪80年代以来盎格鲁-撒克逊模式不断扩张的步伐.打破了其试图一统天下的幻想,使整个资本主义经济陷入了衰退的泥潭中.盎格鲁-撒克逊模式自身的缺陷以及在该理念下采取的一系列政策举措,是造成今天百年一遇的金融危机的诱因.而危机本身标志着盎格鲁-撒克逊模式已经陷入难以自拔的困境.