坚持社会主义:苏联的教训和中国的经验

过去十年来社会主义经济改革的记录,并不能令社会主义者感到鼓舞.苏联为革新社会主义而宣布的改革计划,反而导致废除社会主义的各项制度,以资本主义取而代之.中国领导人为改革社会主义而采取的十分不同的战略使经济快速增长,但过去十年来中国的发展方式越来越像是向资本主义的过渡.承诺的中国特色社会主义日益显现出资本主义倾向.     

苏东地区“现实社会主义”的垮台和当前社会主义计划的重新制定

前言自社会主义作为理论和政治实践出现以来,一直是人们思考和分析的问题。在整个20世纪,不同国家的社会主义革命补充了社会主义计划具体形成的根本问题并对已经出现的社会主义经验做出评价,其中一些经验继续朝着乐观的方向发展。     

国外学者关于苏联模式和社会主义前途的思考

十几年来国外马克思主义学者和实践者对苏东剧变问题进行了多方面的分析研究,对苏联社会主义模式及其在苏东剧变中的作用作出了评价,对苏东剧变后马克思主义的发展前途和社会主义的命运进行了判断。尽管他们对苏联社会主义模式的历史作用看法不尽相同,但对社会主义的未来则都充满了信心。     

Soviet war memorials and the re-construction of national and local identities in post-communist Poland

This article proposes to look afresh at the legacies of communism in urban spaces in post-1989 Poland. Specifically, it investigates the fate of Red Army monuments and explores how these public spaces have been used in the multifaceted and multileveled process of post-communist identity formation. The article suggests that Red Army monuments constitute sites for the articulation of new narratives about the country's past and future which are no longer grounded in the fundamental division between “us” (the nation) and “them” (the supporters of communism) and which are far from being fixed in the binary opposition of the banished and the embraced past. The reorganization of public memory space does not only involve contesting the Soviet past or affirming independence traditions but is rather the outcome of multilayered processes rooted in particularities of time and space. Moreover, the article argues that the dichotomy “liberator versus occupier,” often employed as a viable analytical tool by scholars investigating the post-communist memorial landscape, impedes our understanding of the role played by Soviet war memorials in the process of re-imagining national and local communities in post-1989 Eastern Europe.     

Peripheral modernity and anti-colonial nationalism in Java: economies of race and gender in the constitution of the Indonesian national teleology

This analysis investigates the limits of colonial modernity in the 20th century Dutch East Indies at a time that coincided with the building of the Indonesian national project. I am interested in the constitution of the national teleology as an inexorable socio-political project, deploying specific racial and gendered economies. As a locus of investigation I choose the literary narratives of two celebrated Indonesian intellectuals (and participants in the anti-colonial struggle), Pramoedya’s Buru Quartet and Mangunwijaya’s Durga/Umayi. Were the impulses of anti-colonial resistance intrinsically national in their orientation? Through what erasures and re-appropriations has the nationalism/modernity paradigm become the medium of decolonisation?