论“不具有可撤销内容”行政行为的法律适用

行政诉讼法司法解释第57条对“不具有可撤销内容”的行政行为的规定存在模糊之处,第58条对“第三人合法权益”的保护也极为不利。对行政行为不可撤销的四种情形分别进行分析,或许可以解决上述问题。     

Changes to Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) provisions--HCFA. Notice

This notice describes how subsections 6202(b), (c), and (e) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (Pub. L. 101-239) affect the Medicare Program These subsections: Create uniform rules for computing Medicare secondary payments for all MSP situations; Exempt from the MSP provisions services performed for a religious order by members of the order who take a vow of poverty; Prohibit group health plans (GHPs) from "taking into account" that an individual is entitled to Medicare when Medicare is the secondary payer; Prohibit GHPs from differentiating, in the services they provide, between individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and other individuals covered by the plan; Require that GHPs of employers of 20 or more employees provide the same benefits under the same conditions to employees age 65 or older and employees' spouses age 65 or older as they provide to employees and spouses under age 65; Impose a 25 percent excise tax on contributions that employers and employee organizations make to nonconforming GHPs, i.e., plans that do not comply with the MSP provisions; Extend to all MSP situations the Federal Government's right to take legal action to collect double damages if a primary plan fails to comply with the Medicare secondary payment requirements of the law; Make the provisions for special enrollment periods for the disabled parallel to those in effect for the working aged. The statutory changes made by subsections 6202(b), (c), and (e) can be put into effect without first issuing regulations because it is clear on the face of the statute what the Congress intended.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Notes and comments "High and dry?" The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and liability protection for pharmaceutical manufacturers

In an era filled with fears of bioterrorism, Congress approved the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA) to encourage development of vaccines and other countermeasures. By providing pharmaceutical manufacturers with protection from liability for potential side effects, Congress has attempted to motivate manufacturers to produce a national stockpile of countermeasures. As part of PREPA, the government established a compensatory system intended to provide compensation to persons injured by countermeasures used during a public health emergency. Although the Act provides for a compensation fund, it fails to allocate monies for that fund. Thus, in the absence of further congressional action, PREPA will not provide compensation to those injured by countermeasures. Failing to assure the American public of a compensation program constitutes bad public policy and risks inspiring potential vaccinees to refuse necessary drugs. Additionally, arguments as to the constitutionality of the Act exist should Congress fail to adequately fund the program, and the existence of those arguments undermines the purpose of the Act--namely to assure pharmaceutical manufacturers that they will not be sued into oblivion should they attempt to aid national pandemic protection. In addition to detailing both the Act and the statutory precedent for congressional attempts to spur biodefense, this Article addresses important issues of healthcare, tort, and constitutional law that will continue to manifest themselves in this new era of bioterrorism.     

Is There a Duty to Legislate for Linguistic Minorities?

In April 2005, the Scottish Parliament passed the Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act 2005, requiring certain public bodies in Scotland to provide some services through the medium of Gaelic. This Act was modelled to a certain degree on similar legislation for Welsh, the Welsh Language Act 1993. Both Welsh and Gaelic, and to a lesser extent Irish in Northern Ireland, benefit from a range of other measures of legislative support. Many other languages are, however, spoken in the United Kingdom, and their speakers have needs and expectations. In this article, the extent to which a state is obliged to legislate for these is assessed. Fundamental principles such as the right to freedom from discrimination, equal protection of the law, substantive equality, and the protection and promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity may argue for legislative intervention and support, and the provision of such support to linguistic minorities must itself be non-discriminatory.     

Antigua introduces robust legislation for asset protection trusts

This article highlights key considerations of the InternationalTrust Act of Antigua. The Act authorizes self-settled spendthrifttrusts. Such trusts are used for asset protection in a numberof offshore jurisdictions, but are not authorized in a numberof other jurisdictions, including many States in the UnitedStates.     

Pushing Patriotism: Why Flag Encouragement Doesn't Fly

The federal Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 prohibits homeowners' associations (HOAs) from forbidding the display of the American flag. At least twenty states also have such laws, most of which have not been challenged in court. This article suggests that these “flag-encouragement laws” would not withstand challenges by either residents of HOAs or by HOAs themselves. HOA residents may use the state action doctrine to apply traditional First Amendment jurisprudence to these content-based laws, and HOAs may attack the laws using other precedents of the Supreme Court of the United States.     

Dilution in the US, Europe, and beyond: international obligations and basic definitions

Legal context. The efficacy of trade mark dilution as a causeof action has been cast into doubt by the Supreme Court's actualdilution standard. However, Congress is currently consideringthe Trademark Dilution Revision Act 2005, removing the actualdilution standard and resolving other difficulties under thepresent Lanham Act 43(c). This should breathe new life intoblurring and tarnishment. It should also be recalled that theEU already has strong laws against dilution and unfair advantage. Key points. This article identifies international dilution obligationsin order to determine (in Part II) whether the US and EU arecompliant. It identifies problems under the present US dilutionlaw and the solutions offered by the Revision Act. It comparesthe US proposals with EU dilution protection to determiningwhat the two jurisdictions have to learn from each other. Thistheme will be continued in the next part of this article, whichfocuses specifically on blurring/detriment to distinctive character. Practical significance. The introduction of new US legislationwill make successful dilution claims easier and will increasethe frequency of actions under 43(c). It is vital that trademark lawyers are familiar with the changes. At the same time,it should be remembered that many of the same outcomes can beachieved under the current European legislative provisions.To the extent that the jurisdictions do not live up to theirinternational dilution obligations, there is scope for proprietorsto lobby for even stronger protection.     

A Tort-Based Approach to Damages under the Human Rights Act 1998

This article argues that a strong case can be made for departing from the current approach to damages under the Human Rights Act 1998, and for the adoption of an alternative tort-based approach. The article critically analyses the English courts' arguments against adopting a tort-based approach and demonstrates that neither the Act nor the European Convention on Human Rights militate against such approach. It makes a positive case for a tort-based approach, arguing that the law of damages in tort provides an appropriate model for damages under the Act as a matter of principle given the common functions and protected interests that underpin both areas of the law. Further, tort law offers an established and elaborate corpus of principles to draw on, which can readily and naturally be read across to the human rights context. A tort-based approach would also promote consistency across English law, while generally affording greater protection to human rights than the English courts' current approach.     

Protection of competitors, consumers and the general public--The new German Act against Unfair Competition

Legal context. In 2004 the German legislature passed the newGerman Act Against Unfair Competition, replacing the old Actof 1909. By ensuring effective protection against unfair competitionpractices the Act promotes honest and conscionable conduct inthe marketplace for the benefit of competitors, consumers, andother market participants. Key points. The main provision of the Act in section 3 prohibitsunfair commercial practices in the marketplace which are capableof distorting competition to the detriment of competitors, consumers,and other market participants. The general clause is complementedby a non-exhaustive list of categories of commercial practicesconsidered to be unfair under the more recent 1909 Act caselaw. Further provisions deal separately with the categoriesof misleading, comparative, and intrusive advertising, transposingthe relevant provisions of several European Directives intoGerman law. The Act also encompasses provisions on civil remediesand on litigation such as procedural regulations concerninginjunctive relief actions, competence and jurisdiction, andthe role of mediation boards. Practical significance. The prime focus of the new Act is tofurther liberalize German unfair competition law after the repealof the laws governing discounts and bonuses in 2001. Furthermajor accomplishments of the new Act include the explicit emphasisof a high level of consumer protection: for the first time theconsumer is explicitly mentioned together with competitors andthe general public as a subject of protection under unfair competitionlaw in Germany (tripartite protection). Furthermore, the Actprovides greater transparency than the old Act by introducinga catalogue of definitions and by codifying established caselaw with respect to certain categories of commercial practicesconsidered to be unfair.     

Protected activities of nonunion employees

The vast majority of American workers are nonunion and therefore unprotected by many of the mechanisms established through collective bargaining. They are protected to some degree, however, by a number of statutes and evolving legal doctrines that limit the employer's right to hire, fire, or otherwise discipline its nonunion people. The most elemental of these limitations is embodies in the National Labor Relations Act: section 7 protects the concerted activities of nonunion employees, section 8(a)(1) makes it an unfair labor practice for an employer to interfere with the section 7 rights of its employees; and section 10(c) grants the National Labor Relations Board broad remedial powers to correct violations, including the power to reinstate workers with or without back pay. The following article will examine this basic protection of nonunion employees and will point out those areas in which the Board has attempted to expand the scope of section 7's protection.     

NEPA: Not as Much as Many Wanted; More than Many Bargained for.… All We're Likely to Get

This article is an elaboration of remarks made at the American Society of Planning Officials annual conference workshop on the National Environmental Policy Act, April 9, 1973. It is also part of a more extensive analysis of impact statements and the National Environmental Policy Act being undertaken by the author during 1973–74, as a joint project of the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources and the Fund for Environmental Studies, in Bonn, Germany. It is not intended to be an exhaustive analysis of the Act, its historical background or potential administrative problems posed either by the Act itself, or by CEQ guidelines or court decisions implementing the Act. Most of these issues have been explored at some length by others. If anything, this article is an early, perhaps too early, favorable appraisal of the Act, along with some cautions and the author's biases as to what practical and political reality is likely to produce vis-a-vis NEPA in the near future.     

Exemption of certain systems of records under the Privacy Act. Final rule

This final rule exempts four systems of records (SORs) from subsections (c)(3), (d)(1) through (d)(4), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): The Automated Survey Processing Environment (ASPEN) Complaint/ Incidents Tracking System (ACTS), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0565; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Information Tracking System (HITS), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0544; the Organ Procurement Organizations System (OPOS), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70- 0575; and the Fraud Investigation Database (FID), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0527.     

Exemption of certain systems of records under the Privacy Act. Proposed rule

This proposed rule would exempt the four system of records from subsections (c)(3), (d)(1) through (d)(4),(e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(2): The Automated Survey Processing Environment (ASPEN) Complaint/Incidents Tracking System ("ACTS"), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0565; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Information Tracking System ("HITS"), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0544; the Organ Procurement Organizations System ("OPOS"), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0575; and the Fraud Investigation Database ("FID"), HHS/CMS, System No. 09-70-0527.     

Dilution in the United States and European Union (and beyond) Part II: testing for blurring

Legal context. Dilution by blurring has often been accused ofbeing a vague concept which is difficult to understand and whichhas no sensible limits. Mindful of the need for certainty inthis area, the US Senate and House of Representatives have passedthe Trademark Dilution Revision Act 2006. This Bill (which isdiscussed more generally in Part I) includes a definition ofblurring and a six-point test for blurring. Meanwhile, the EuropeanUnion has been steadily building up jurisprudence in this area. Key points. This part of the article focuses on dilution byblurring, considering how blurring is defined, how it is testedfor and whether US and EU blurring protection is in compliancewith the jurisdictions’ international obligations in thisarea (discussed in Part I). In particular, it considers thenew definition of, and test for, blurring under the US TrademarkDilution Revision Act 2006, and compares the position underthat Bill to the situation in the EU. Practical significance. Assuming that it enters into law, theRevision Act 2006 has serious implications for the proprietorsof famous marks doing business in the US. This article willinform the owners of such marks what protection they will benefitfrom and how this will differ from the protection they willget in the EU.     

美国修改《数字千年版权法》的反垄断法解读——以Iphone智能手机的“越狱”“解锁”事件为例

美国修改《数字千年版权法》,使破解IPhone等智能手机,以便转换电信服务提供商;或者安装非IPhone应用程序都成为合法的事情。此事件在知识经济时代中对各国数字版权的保护,防止知识产权的滥用具有一定的代表性。从此事件中可看到,美国修改《数字千年版权法》,打破了原来的关于捆绑电信运营商,不允许兼容其他程序等限制性商业行为,使得以创新和竞争为特征的信息产业,具有继续向前发展的动力。美国修改《数字千年版权法》,对中国反垄断法的实施具有一定指导意义。即在网络经济时代,在保护知识产权的合法垄断权时,中国反垄断法应该禁止知识产权滥用,鼓励创新或动态效率的促进,消费者福利的保护。     

The third way in mental health policy: negative rights, positive rights, and the Convention

Mentally disordered patients may be said to have rights in two senses: negative rights to freedom from arbitrary detention or interference with their person; and positive rights to expect a certain minimum standard of service, be that in terms of treatment as an in-patient, or as a patient in the community. The Labour government has appointed a 'scoping group' to carry out a root-and-branch review of the Mental Health Act 1983. The 1983 Act was mainly concerned with in-patient treatment. The group is to look at the scope for introducing further compulsory powers in the community, enhancing the rights of carers and relatives, and is to take account of recent British and Strasbourg case law. The primary impact of the Convention on psychiatric patients has been in relation to protection against arbitrary detention under Article 5, unsoundness of mind being one of the permitted grounds of deprivation of liberty under Article 5(1)(e). This article explores the potential impact of Convention rights in developing what Gostin referred to in the early 1980s as a 'new legalism'. The new legalism linked concern for traditional rights to due process and review by the courts or other external bodies with the 'ideology of entitlement' to adequate treatment and services. The article outlines the current policy context of mental health services and looks at the development by the European Court of Human Rights of positive Convention rights to services out of Article 5, whose purpose seems at first sight to be the protection of due process rights. It examines the relevance of Convention rights to community powers.     

美国对外国国家的送达制度

美国《外国主权豁免法》明确规定了对外国国家的送达程序,以区别于《联邦民事诉讼法》中的送达程序。这些特殊的送达规则以及送达实践强调被送达的外国国家实际接收和接受送达的效果,更加注重程序公正,在某种程度上给予外国国家更多的正当程序保障,增强审判程序和判决的可接受性,减少或避免国家豁免诉讼可能带来的政治风险。中国应对在美国法院被诉时,应当充分利用美国《外国主权豁免法》中的送达规则和实践,更好地维护我国的尊严和主权。     

Truth and Consequences: Law,Myth and Metaphor in American Indian Contested Adoption

This article considers the effects of the operations of myth and metaphor on law through a comparison of a United States Supreme Court decision and a novel that deal with the contested trans-racial adoption of an American Indian child. It argues that the United States founding myth of Manifest Destiny—of the divinely ordained fate of the continent to host a (white) Christian state—is determinative of the way in which legal decisions regarding American Indians are made. The myth of Manifest Destiny contains a metaphor of vanished American Indians, such that contemporary American Indians are rendered nearly invisible and whose existence is not easily absorbed into the working of the American legal system. The American Indian Child Welfare Act provides protections against assimilation for indigenous families and community, thus working at cross-purposes to the ultimate aim of Manifest Destiny. What happens in those instances when legal provisions and interpretation run counter to Manifest Destiny? Through the consideration of the situation of a contested adoption, this article reveals the heavy influence of Manifest Destiny in the Supreme Court decision, which is counter to the vision of a pluralistic culture envisioned in both the novel and the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) itself. The consequences of legal resistance to ICWA for American Indian communities and as to the operation of the legal system itself are discussed.     

论中小微企业科技创新人才法律保障机制的完善

中小微企业科技创新人才法律保障机制是指从法律上为生产规模较小、从业人员和营业收入较少的企业进行科技创新活动的人才提供保障的机制。我国虽然在《中华人民共和国中小企业促进法》、《中华人民共和国科学技术进步法》等法律法规和政策中对中小微企业科技创新人才法律保障机制进行了初步规定,但还是面临着缺乏专门立法、立法位阶不高、操作性不强、激励机制不完善等困境。美国完善的法律体系、英国的激励机制等值得我国借鉴。我们应该从清理和整合现有法律、法规政策、制定中小微企业科技创新人才保障法、完善人才激励机制和科技服务体系等方面完善中小微企业科技人才法律保障机制。     

Getting to Grips with Sexual Grooming? The New Offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003

In recent years, there has been increased societal concern regarding the dangers posed to children by sexual abuse and other related acts. For the main part, this article examines the new offence of meeting a child following sexual grooming under Section 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. I will address the question of whether the introduction of this offence is likely to meet the Government's aim of providing greater protection for children against behaviour associated with sexual abuse. In particular, I will consider how difficult it will be to prove the existence of a harmful ulterior intent in order to make out the offence and why the Government has opted to create this specific offence rather than utilise the existing law of criminal attempt. I will argue that the new offence is a step in the right direction and that the current protection offered to children will be significantly extended by its introduction.