DISCUSSION ON PAPER BY Dr EVANS

Dr Evans stressed that the attempt to plan for the effects of technological changes was likely to be very difficult, or even to set misleading precedents. Such changes were largely unpredictable, and compensation schemes for displacement are often highly inequitable in their impact.     

孙中山与公共管理

孙中山是中国20世纪三大伟人中的第一人.他深信应该"天下为公",并将终于实现世界"大同".他对"政治"的简单解释为"政"指"众人的事","治"是"管理",亦即"管理众人的事"就是"政治".他努力谋求公共利益和重视合格公共管理人员的培养,在理论和实践方面,很接近或相同于后来成为新兴独立学科的"公共行政"或"公共管理"所研习的内容.因此,他可算是中国现代公共管理研究的先驱.     

The rise of Dr Walter Becher

Meir Kahane's accession to the Knesset in the 1984 elections sparked a debate about the implications of Kahanism in Israeli politics. Whilst the Israeli left saw it as a logical extension of Likud policy and entirely representative of the national religious camp, others maintained that it had more in common with secular Zionism. Consequently, Kahane was portrayed as representing one point on a continuum, rather than as an evil sui generis.     

DISCUSSION ON PAPERS BY Mr MUNRO AND Dr HAWKER

Three speakers, Mr J. L. Evans (Education Department, Tasmania), Mr D. Moore (New Zealand Institute of Public Administration), and Ms D. K. Conroy (Queensland Institute of Technology) agreed that a major element in the papers was the demand for change. Reducing staff, though the commonest solution to the problem of "managing with less", did not necessarily lead to effective administration, especially when departments were expected to maintain the same range of activities. Mr Evans argued that change had to pay regard to the needs of clients. "We must see that those who are hurt are not those who can least afford to suffer". There might be ways of simplifying administration, such as a better sorting out of federal-state activities. Mr Moore asked whether it was a real option that governments should do less in an age of higher technology, more unemployment, and greater calls for equity and help to the underprivileged.     

Debating the ‘Stalemate’: A Response to Dr Dixon

This article responds to the critique of our work offered by Paul Dixon in this issue of Political Quarterly. We correct the numerous inaccuracies and straightforward errors in his work, which, in our view, distort and misrepresent our arguments.     

在体制创新与发挥能动性上下功夫--经济学家范恒山博士谈西部大开发

西部大开发是我国现代化进程中的一项重大战略部署,是实施我国区域发展战略的必然要求和重要组成部分。西部大开发不仅关系到西部地区经济社会的发展,而且关系到我国现代化的实现。实施西部大开发战略已一年有余,经过了群情振奋并形成了共识之后,就应该是深层的冷思考和切实的行动了。下一步开发西部的着力点应放在哪里？记者访问了范恒山博士。 记者：范博士,我看过您在北京电视台、中央电视台与中外专家探讨西部大开发问题的节目。想请您展开谈谈您对西部开发的战略思考。我们知道,西部大开发的战略目标是实现我国各区域间的协调共…     

Laudatio: Verleihung des Theodor Eschenburg-Preises an Prof. Dr. Gerhard Lehmbruch am 25. September 2003 auf dem Kongress der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft in Mainz

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Laudatio: Verleihung des Theodor Eschenburg-Preises an Prof. Dr. Helga Haftendorn am 27. September 2006 auf dem Kongress der Deutschen Vereinigung für Politische Wissenschaft in Münster

Ohne Zusammenfassung