共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Young GW 《Health law vigil》1984,7(24):suppl 1-suppl 2
3.
Young GW 《Health law vigil》1984,7(13):suppl 1-suppl 2
4.
5.
6.
Young GW 《Health law vigil》1983,6(26):2p following 14
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Julian Le Grand 《Social Justice Research》1987,1(3):257-274
Equity goals, such as equal treatment for equal need or equality of access, commonly take pride of place among the aims of health policy. But do these conceptions, or others derived from more fundamental philosophical systems such as those of the utilitarians or John Rawls, successfully capture the way in which the term equity is generally used? If not, is it possible to find some interpretation that can command a greater consensus? This paper answers no to the first question and yes to the second. It is argued that the standard conceptions of equity ignore the processes by which health states are determined and hence the extent to which they arise from factors beyond individual control. An alternative conception is proposed that directly incorporates these considerations. 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Orentlicher D 《Annals of health law / Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, Institute for Health Law》2010,19(3):449-64, 1 p preceding i
The article examines two primary policy proposals for how the U.S. should allocate its limited health care dollars: a centralized model in which a commission establishes rationing guidelines, and a decentralized model in which rationing decisions are made by health care providers on a case by case basis. The author finds significant advantages with each position, leading the author to assert that a combination of each is key to an effective rationing policy: a centralized control of structure coupled with decentralized physician-level decision making. While mindful that formal rationing guidelines alone are unfeasible to effectuate cost-effective care, the author introduces two decentralized policies to control costs: the limitation of resources at physicians' disposal and elimination of physicians' personal incentive to provide high-cost care. 相似文献
20.