共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(1):110
2.
《Trusts & Trustees》2009,15(1):1
3.
《Trusts & Trustees》2008,14(4):199
4.
《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(2):240
5.
《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):104
6.
《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):455-456
7.
《Trusts & Trustees》2008,14(3):151
8.
Lessig Blog By Lawrence Lessig United States of America Archivedback to August 2002 http://www.lessig.org/blog/ Techno Llama ByAndres Guadamuz Scotland Archived back to October 2004 http://technollama.blogspot.com/ Patently-O:Patent Law Blog By Dennis Crouch United States of America Archivedback to April 2005 http://patentlaw.typepad.com/
Lessig Blog
Lawrence Lessig is the author of such revered titles as Codeand Other Laws of Cyberspace and The Future of Ideas. As maybe expected, his eponymous blog site follows themes 相似文献
9.
10.
《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(3):325
11.
《Jnl of Intellectual Property Law & Pract》2008,3(4):206-208
12.
《Jnl of Intellectual Property Law & Pract》2008,3(1):2-4
13.
《Jnl of Intellectual Property Law & Pract》2008,3(3):148-150
14.
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
1. Introduction
2. Growth in the underlying–syndicated secured loan market
3. Factors influencing the decision to hold physical or synthetic positions
Attitudes of new entrants to the credit market Attitudes of banks and new regulatory standards Developing loan indices and service providers The LCDS documentation Motivation of market participants
4. Key documentation issues
Callability/cancelability Restructuring Reference Obligation Deliverable Obligation Substitution of the Reference Entity Substitution of the Reference Obligation or Deliverable Obligation Syndicated Secured Dispute Event and Syndicated Secured Resolution Settlement
5. Conclusion
相似文献
- The market for Loan Only Credit Default Swaps (LCDS)is expected to develop rapidly, but the market documentationfor this product is proving to be a difficult issue as a resultof differing views by users of the product and divergent approachesbetween the US and European markets.
- The International Swapsand Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA) has, on 4 May 2007,released a long-awaited revised draft of the European LCDS.The finalization of this draft is not far off, but certain importantissues are yet to be finalized.
- Rather than speculate on theoutcome of such discussions, this article looks at the developmentof the European LCDS market, the motivation and needs of itsparticipants and takes stock of the European documentation beforeit underwent the recent almost year-long consultation process.It therefore compares the European LCDS of May 2006 againstthe US LCDS of June 2006 (ignoring
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
15.
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
1. Introduction
2. Reports under the Transparency Obligations Directive
3. Liability for disclosure under English law
4. What went wrong?
5. Making the logical connections
6. Achieving the right threshold for liability
7. The importance of consistency in liability for market disclosures
- This article explains why the recent TransparencyDirective led to an unintended change in law in the United Kingdomrelating to liability for annual and other reports by listedcompanies. The change was the result of a misunderstanding ofthe fact that the expressed or implied purpose of disclosurecan act as a trigger for liability in negligence. The articleargues that new disclosure requirements should always be reviewedin the light of the liability that will be imposed on thoseresponsible for the disclosure, so that costs and benefits canbe correctly balanced and prompt, reliable and relevant disclosurewill be encouraged.
- The new liability regime for reports inthe United Kingdom is considered and it is argued that the regimeshould logically be extended beyond company reports to the fullrange of disclosures required of companies that are admittedto regulated markets.
- The article concludes by
. . . [Full Text of this Article]