共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Izabela Z. Schultz 《Psychological injury and law》2008,1(2):94-102
This paper critically reviews and integrates multidisciplinary literature informing conceptualization and determination of disability and return to work from a psychological injury perspective. It focuses on dissecting and disentangling the ambiguities and complexities of theories and definitions of disability, impairment, and return to work, highlighting the conceptual quagmires that affect both research and clinical methodology in the field. The paper discusses the strengths and limitations of the main theoretical perspectives on disability and return to work—social, medical, and biopsychosocial—and the associated applied perspectives, including the legal/administrative, clinical, and research oriented. It provides a special focus on the Americans with Disabilities Act and the American Medical Association’s Guides for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment as leading applied perspectives. The paper also highlights the features and methodological implications of the integrative framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (World Health Organization, International classification of functioning, disabilities and health, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001). Finally, it draws implications for the field of psychological injury in a legal context. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Grad FP 《Columbia journal of law and social problems》1976,12(4):489-529
15.
16.
17.
《Computer Law & Security Report》2003,19(5):392-393
Over recent years there has been a great deal of speculation over the prospect of taking various business processes offshore to low cost economies. More recently, and to the concern of various trade unions, the speculation is becoming reality — major UK and multinational organisations are now “offshoring” a significant proportion of their business processes. This article explores the issues involved. 相似文献
18.
19.
20.
Tonn K 《Annals of health law / Loyola University Chicago, School of Law, Institute for Health Law》2007,16(2):241-62, table of content
This article explores the problems within a niche area of health law, the Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) safe harbor of the Anti-Kickback Statute. The author advocates for its removal by discussing how the HPSA designation is being used incorrectly to curb fraudulent behavior and how the current provision serves few hospitals. The author concludes by suggesting innovative solutions to remedy the problems with the current HPSA designation system. 相似文献