共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Faye Boland 《Liverpool Law Review》1997,19(2):231-239
Conclusion
R. v.Ireland marked the emergence of the psychic assault—an assault which does not involve fear of immediate force, where the harm becomes
a feature of the assault. This explains why foresight ofsuch harm was required of the defendant by the Court of Appeal inIreland. However, the more recent discussions on assault, by the House of Lords inR. v.Burstow, R. v.Ireland and by the Court of Appeal inR. v.Constanza, have made no reference to the defendant's foresight or to the victim's psychiatric injury. Instead the decisions have focused
on the victim's fear of immediate violence. To this extent they have halted the development of the psychiatric assault and
preserved the traditional view of assault as the apprehension of immediate unlawful force. 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
Brock VM 《Loyola law review》1980,26(3):749-760
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.