1 November: Deadline for firms to comply with the requirementsof MiFID. 1 November: MiFID/Capital Requirements Directive—Dateon which the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and ControlsSourcebook (SYSC) will be disapplied (for all common platformfirms) and replaced by the common platform. 1 November: Date from which the proposed amendments to the Admissionand Disclosure Standards of the  相似文献   

2.
  14 May: Deadline for comments on the Accounting Standards Board'sExposure Draft of a Statement ‘Half Yearly Financial Reports’. 30 May: 39th ICMA AGM and Annual Conference takes place in Berlin,Germany. 31 May: Capital Requirements Directive—CEBS to providea quantitative analysis of the types of capital held by  相似文献   

3.
  5 April: Transition period under Finance Act 2006 ends, andAccumulation and Maintenance trusts will become subject to therelevant property regime. 6 April: Capital gains tax reform – a new flat rate ofcapital gains tax of 18% for individuals and trustees and taperrelief will be withdrawn (the changes do not apply to capitalgains  相似文献   

4.
Economic crises, capital transfer restrictions and investor protection under modern investment treaties     
Kolo  Abba; Walde  Thomas 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(2):154-185
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Capital liberalization was the norm of internationaleconomic relations until the Economic Depression of the 1930swhen exchange restrictions became an important instrument ofeconomic policy of many countries.
  • The IMF Articles of Agreementwere the outcome of efforts by several countries to providean acceptable international legal framework that would minimizethe negative impact of exchange restrictions while at the sametime preserving the right of Member States to impose exchangerestrictions when faced with balance-of-payment problems.
  • Thatposition is to a large extent maintained by most modern investmenttreaties although subject to heightened scrutiny by internationalarbitral tribunals under the disciplines of expropriation, nationaltreatment and fair and equitable treatment standards among othersin order to protect investors’ interests whilst safeguardinghost states, regulatory autonomy.
 
  The Asian and Russian financial crises in 1998 and the Argentineeconomic crisis of 2001 and the claims brought against some. . . [Full Text of this Article]     Main approaches on capital transfers under investment treatiesApplication of the doctrine of necessity under international law to capital transfer measuresCapital transfer restriction measures and indirect expropriationOther investment obligations, in particular fair and equitable treatmentTransparency and the protection of legitimate expectationsFreedom from coercion and harassmentProcedural proprietyProtection against arbitrariness: discrimination and ‘national treatment’Good faith      相似文献   

5.
  February 20072 February: CESR's consultation period closes on Draft Level3 Guidance on the operation of the MAD. 9 February: CESR's consultation period closes on inducementsunder MiFID. 9 February: CESR's consultation period closes on  相似文献   

6.
  2 March – ‘Switzerland and the Taxation of TrustArrangements’, STEP Event (Zurich, Switzerland) 3 March – ‘Trusts and International Taxation: SessionG: Switzerland’, STEP Event (Zurich, Switzerland) 3 March – ‘Successful Estate Planning’, IIRConference (London, UK) 5 March – ‘Powers  相似文献   

7.
How to compare regulatory regimes     
Wood  Philip R. 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):332-344
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.
It is the policy of this Journal to only publish material thathas not been published previously. However, an exception hasbeen made with this article as the work from which it has beendrawn has only recently published. This article is taken fromPhilip Wood's Regulation of International Finance, one of aseries of nine works by Philip Wood on the law of practice ofInternational Finance, published by Sweet & Maxwell in 2007.Philip Wood is a member of the Editorial Board of Capital MarketsLaw Journal. Many readers of Capital Markets Law Journal aroundthe world will not have had the chance to read this very topicalarticle which is of exceptional quality and Capital MarketsLaw Journal is very pleased to make it available to the widercapital markets community.                 TheEditors
Key points
  • This article examines the criteria which might usefullybe . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
                Identity and independence of regulatorsCodification of the lawCriminalization of the lawXenophobia and protectionismDegree of investor protectionFreedom index      相似文献   

8.
Three IP blogs     
Headdon  Toby 《Jnl of Intellectual Property Law & Pract》2006,1(7):493-494
Lessig Blog By Lawrence Lessig United States of America Archivedback to August 2002 http://www.lessig.org/blog/ Techno Llama ByAndres Guadamuz Scotland Archived back to October 2004 http://technollama.blogspot.com/ Patently-O:Patent Law Blog By Dennis Crouch United States of America Archivedback to April 2005 http://patentlaw.typepad.com/  
  Lawrence Lessig is the author of such revered titles as Codeand Other Laws of Cyberspace and The Future of Ideas. As maybe expected, his eponymous blog site follows themes  相似文献   

9.
  1 May – Ascension in Liechtenstein and Switzerland (publicholiday) 5 May – May Bank Holiday, UK (public holiday) 7 May – ‘Antitrust Litigation – EC White PaperAnalysis’ Centaur Conference (London, UK) 8–9 May – ‘Legal Challenges for Foreign Investmentin Latin America’, American Bar Association Seminar (SaoPaulo Brazil) 9 May  相似文献   

10.
  FSA expected to publish its feedback statement on the definitionof capital. 29 June: Deadline for the implementation  相似文献   

11.
Retail cascading in Germany a model for a revision of the PD?     
Schneider  Hannes; Haag  Hendrik 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2007,2(4):370-380
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The EU Prospectus Directive (the ‘PD’),as implemented in several EEA member states, including the UnitedKingdom, and the Regulation accompanying the PD (the ‘Regulation’)render difficult or even inhibit public offers of debt securitiesto retail investors.
  • Market participants and their advisors,trade associations such as the International Capital MarketAssociation (‘ICMA’), as well as the United KingdomListing Authority (‘UKLA’) and the Committee ofEuropean Securities Regulators (‘CESR’) have beendealing with the issues. UKLA and ICMA have come forward byproposing a solution regarding the information requirementsof Annex V.5 of the Regulation. The proposal is to utilize Article23.4 of the Regulation allowing information required by theRegulation to be omitted if the information is not pertinentto the offer. CESR may take a wider approach. It has indicatedits willingness to assess whether further Level 2 work is appropriateand legislative action will . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
        The legislative history of Section 3 (1) WpPGNon-conforming transposition?DiscussionValidity of prospectus, supplements to the prospectus and publication of inside informationProspectus liabilityAnnex V.5 of the RegulationDebt issuance programmes in particular    相似文献   

12.
  24 September: Deadline for comments on the DTI's consultativedocument on registration of Scottish floating charges underthe Companies Act 2006.   Clearing and settlement—the Economic and Financial Committeeto prepare comprehensive strategic discussions  相似文献   

13.
  The Italian torpedo is dead: long live the Italian torpedo.A recently published decision of the Milan Court of First Instancenot only confirms that a cross-border claim for a declarationof non-infringement of a European patent is unlikely to succeedbefore an Italian court unless it is brought against an Italiandomiciled party, but also shows that the longstanding traditionof Italian torpedoes is not yet defunct, contrary to predictionsafter a landmark decision of the Italian Supreme Court in 2003.(p. 6) Wilfulness redefined: In re Seagate. In In re Seagate Tech.LLC, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit redefinedwilfulness relating to patent infringement, altered how wilfulnesswill be litigated,  相似文献   

14.
  PatentsIrish ‘Lipitor’ litigation: High Court favours broadclaim construction. In its first significant judgment on claimconstruction in over 25 years, Ireland's High Court approvedthe principles laid down by the English House of Lords in Kirin-Amgen,holding that Warner-Lambert's ‘Lipitor’ patent isnot limited to a racemic mixture and refusing Ranbaxy a declarationof non-infringement. Trade marksCancellation of a trade mark based on a prior foreign geographicalindication related to different products. The registration andthe use of a composite trade mark including a famous geographicalindication (GI), for products different to those covered bythe GI, are acts of unfair competition insofar as they allowthe trade mark owner to free-ride on the  相似文献   

15.
  PatentsAdvanced therapies and the outer limits of DNA regulation: newhorizons for patents or a scaffold too far? This Regulationseeks to regulate existing and future advanced therapy medicinalproducts intended for the market in Member States, being eitherprepared industrially or manufactured by a method involvingan industrial process, and introduces additional provisionsto those laid down in the pharmaceutical legislation Directive2001/83. (p. 210)Federal Circuit affirms Nilssen's 15 patents unenforceable forinequitable conduct. The US Federal Circuit affirmed the DistrictCourt finding; it did not abuse its discretion in holding 15of Nilssen's patents unenforceable due to his intentional withholdingof material information during patent prosecution from the USPatent Office (‘USPTO’). (p. 212)Trade marksCourt in Argentina holds that HARRODS trade marks cannot co-exist.In October 2007, Chamber I of the Federal Civil and CommercialChamber of Appeals, Buenos  相似文献   

16.
  After completing my law degree  相似文献   

17.
Emissions trading in the European Union     
Roberts  Rhian; Staples  Chris 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):5-17
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • The EU ETS will undergo a number of changes consequentupon the commencement of the first Kyoto Commitment Period on1 January 2008.
  • This article considers the existing EU ETSframework and also the key developments that are anticipatedin the European emissions market for 2008–2012.
  • A secondarymarket for trading EUAs has already developed and this market,together with the standard-form documentation used, is discussed.
  • Inconclusion, the article questions the future of emissions tradingin Europe—particularly after the current Kyoto targetsexpire in 2012.
  European businesses entered a carbon-constrained economic environmenton 1 January 2005. For some, the impacts were immediate anddirect in the form of caps on their emissions. The majorityfelt it indirectly and more slowly through increased energycosts as the perceived cost of compliance was passed on by generators.The full impacts are not yet clear, but a quiet revolution is. . . [Full Text of this Article]
                  CDM projectsJI projects                      相似文献   

18.
Indirect holdings of securities and exercise of shareholder rights (a Spanish perspective)     
Trueba  Ignacio Gomez-Sancha 《Capital Markets Law Journal》2008,3(1):32-57
The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. Key points
  • Shareholder rights have been the centre of the debatein Corporate Governance since recently. At the same time, modernsecurities markets have evolved and changed profoundly in recentdecades, both in the way in which the securities are representedand transferred—through electronic book entries held byintermediaries—and in the geographical reach of such transfers:every corner of the world.
  • Recent research has thoroughly analysedthe effects of the indirect holding system in those countriesthat have chosen to give legal status to indirect holding systems(where the paradigm is the USA), leading to the conclusion thatin these countries the issuer–investor relationship encountersfar more difficulties than in those that facilitate direct holding.Some scholars have even proposed that countries such as theUSA should move into a direct holding similar to the Spanishone.
  • This article analyses whether direct holdings facilitatethe said issuer–investor relationship by reviewing . . . [Full Text of this Article]
 
   
  首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
   November 2007    May 2007    April 2008    1. Introduction    2. Development of international law on capital transfers    3. Analysis of capital transfer restrictions under modern investment treaties    4. Remedies and compensation    5. Conclusion    First Quarter 2007    March 2009    1. Jurisdictions of the world    2. Legal families for the purposes of financial law    3. Characteristics of measurement criteria    4. General financial law criteria    5. Application of general criteria to legal systems    6. Legal and political infrastructure as a criterion    7. Commonality of underlying regulatory law    8. Criteria for measuring regulatory law    9. Comparison of the US and the UK    10. Background influences on the regulatory regime    Lessig Blog    May 2008    June 2008    1. Introduction    2. The regime preceding the PD: the Public Offer Directive    3. The Prospectus Directive    4. Retail cascades in Germany    5. A model for a revision of the PD?    September 2007    Autumn 2007    Current intelligence    Current intelligence    Current intelligence    How did you first become interested in intellectual property?    1. Sector coverage    2. Allocation    3. Treatment of new entrants    4. Installation closure    5. Auctioning    6. Trading    7. The Kyoto Protocol    8. Linking to the Kyoto Mechanisms    9. Buying from clean development and joint implementation projects    10. The primary market    11. The secondary market    12. Existing documentation for trading EUAs    13. Deliverability issues for Kyoto Credits    14. Eligibility requirements for emissions trading    15. The International Transaction Log    16. Commitment period reserves    17. The impact on secondary trading documentation    18. The voluntary market for CERs    19. The future for emissions trading    1. Introduction    2. Back where it started