共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ian Ward 《Liverpool Law Review》2010,31(3):207-232
Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France is one of the defining texts in the history of English constitutional thought. It is conservative in its overt defence of
England’s ancient constitution, and in particular the twin bulwarks of Church and Crown. In more immediate terms, it was written
against those who appeared to sympathise with the principles of the French revolution, men such as Joseph Price and Tom Paine.
But the true ‘genius’ of Burke, as Wordsworth famously noted, does not lie in the surface defence of traditional conservative
institutions and principles. It lies, rather, in an appreciation that constitutions are aesthetic expressions, their vitality
dependent upon the strength of the political imagination which they strive to shape and to nurture. What is truly distinctive
about Burke’s Reflections accordingly is that it was written as a poetic as much as a political treatise. The purpose of this essay is to explore this
genius and this poetic. 相似文献
6.
7.
Alon Harel 《Criminal Law and Philosophy》2017,11(4):847-859
Why Law Matters examines various legal and political institutions and procedures and argues that the desirability of these institutions and procedures is not contingent and does not hinge (only) on the prospects that these institutions are conducive to the realization of valuable ends. Instead, various legal institutions and legal procedures that are often perceived as contingent means to facilitate the realization of valuable ends matter as such. 相似文献
8.
9.
Saul Smilansky 《Law and Philosophy》2011,30(3):353-367
How can hard determinism deal with the need to punish, when coupled with the obligation to be just? I argue that even though hard determinists might find it morally permissible to incarcerate wrongdoers apart from lawful society, they are committed to the punishment’s taking a very different form from common practice in contemporary Western societies. Hard determinists are in fact committed to what I will call funishment, instead of punishment. But, by its nature funishment is a practical reductio of hard determinism: it makes implementing hard determinism impossible to contemplate. Indeed, the social practices that hard determinism requires turn out to be morally bad even according to hard determinism itself. I conclude by briefly reflecting upon the implications. 相似文献
10.
Peter Oberndorfer 《Journal für Rechtspolitik》2011,19(1):47-51
Der Beitrag schildert aus Anlass seines 70. Geburtstages die gro?en Verdienste, die sich Karl Korinek um die ?sterreichische Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit im Allgemeinen sowie als Pr?sident des VfGH im Besonderen erworben hat. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
Daniel Raveh 《Journal of Indian Philosophy》2008,36(2):319-333
The article offers a close reading of the famous upanişadic story of Indra, Virocana and Prajāpati from the eighth chapter
of the Chāndogya-Upanişad versus Śankara’s bhāşya, with special reference to the notions of suşupti and turīya. That Śankara is not always loyal to the Upanişadic texts is a well-known fact. That the Upanişads are (too) often read
through Śan-kara’s Advaitic eyes is also known. The following lines will not merely illustrate the gap between text and commentary
but will also reveal an unexpected Upanişadic depiction of ‘dreamless sleep’ and ‘transcendental consciousness’. Suşupti is described here as ‘one step too far’, as a ‘break’ or discontinuity in one’s consciousness; whereas turīya is depicted positively, and surprisingly even in wordly terms. Unlike the third state of consciousness in which there is
no ‘world’ nor ‘me’, and which is described through Indra’s character as ‘total destruction’ (vināśa); in turīya, the world ‘comes back’, or rather the ‘renouncer’ returns to the world. Sankara’s position, as far as the story under discussion
is concerned, is radically different. For him, the Upanişadic story illustrates the continuity of consciousness in all its states. For him, the identification with merely one of the consciousness-states
is an error (adhyāsa) which causes suffering. Consciousness prevails even in suşupti, and turīya has nothing to do with ‘coming back to the world’, since there is nowhere to come back from or to. Turīya, as seen by the Advaitin, consists of all the other states of consciousness together, or as K. C. Bhattacharyya puts it,
‘It is not only a stage among stages; it is the truth of the other stages’.
The article is dedicated to Prof. Daya Krishna (1924-2007). 相似文献
15.
16.
Rechtsprechung
Grundbuchsrecht 相似文献17.
18.
19.
20.