共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 4 毫秒
1.
2.
Farrah Ahmed 《The Modern law review》2017,80(2):238-262
Courts and scholars across jurisdictions increasingly identify personal autonomy as the primary rationale for the right to religious freedom. But there are tensions between autonomy on one hand, and religious belief, practice and proselytism on the other. This paper will focus on two tensions which have unappreciated implications for religious freedom jurisprudence, particularly that of the ECHR. The first tension stems from the resistance of some religious beliefs to revision. The second stems from the manipulative nature of some modes of religious proselytism. This paper argues that, given these tensions, the protection currently offered to religious beliefs, practices and proselytism by the right to religious freedom cannot be justified by reference to the value of autonomy. This finding has significant implications for the justification of the right to religious freedom. 相似文献
3.
4.
名誉权与言论自由:宣科案中的是非与轻重 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
本文围绕不久前审结的一场名誉权诉讼展开讨论。文章首先分析了该案涉及的事实和法律问题;然后揭示并讨论了该案中被遮蔽和忽略的具有重要意义的宪法问题;最后则对法院审理名誉权诉讼时应当遵循的原则作了进一步的讨论。本文的基本观点是名誉权诉讼包含了公民人格尊严和言论自由两种基本权利之间的紧张关系。处理名誉权诉讼的正确办法不是先验地确定何种权利当然地具有优先性,而是在民主宪政的一般原则之下,根据每一案件的具体情况,判断什么是最值得保护的价值,并在此基础上平衡各种不同利益。 相似文献
5.
6.
一表达自由(freedom of expression),也称信息自由、言论自由(freedom of speech),意指所见所闻所思以某种方式或形式表现于外的自由。它至少包括了解信息的自由、持有意见的自由、传播意见的自由、接受意见的自由、意见表达方式的自由,是一个以知情权为中心的法律构造。信息自由保障了一个人传递并且获得信息的权利。其正当性大致基于下面三个互相依 相似文献
7.
8.
论表达自由与公正审判 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
表达自由与公正审判均具有极大的社会价值 ,但又存在着一定的利益冲突 ,怎样合理处理它们之间的关系 ,是各国法学界和法律实务界共同关注的重要话题。本文概述了国际社会对表达自由与公正审判关系之态度 ,着重阐述了表达自由与公正审判之间的界线问题 ,并最终提出了在国内解决这一矛盾的建议 相似文献
9.
表达自由、媒体近用权与政府规制 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
一、表达自由与思想市场理论
表达自由,又称表现自由、意见自由、表述自由,其内涵和外延在学理和制度上可谓莫衷一是、形形色色,不过,将这项具有普适性的基本人权界定为:公民享有的受法律规定、认可或保障的,使用各种媒介或方式公开发表、传递思想、意见、主张、观点、情感或信息等内容而不受他人干涉、限制或侵犯的权利,则应被广泛接受. 相似文献
10.
11.
LESLIE GREEN 《Law & policy》1991,13(3):215-229
This paper argues that sound principles of freedom of expression protect an individual's choice of which language to speak. They do so, not to guarantee against mistranslation, but rather to ensure that speakers are able to reach their intended audiences and, more importantly, to allow for the expressive value of speaking a particular language as a symbol of ethnic or political identification. The example of Quebec's Charter of the French Language and the resulting litigation is considered in some detail. 相似文献
12.
13.
著作权侵权具有易发性、难以预防和控制、侵权成本低与维权成本高的特点。传统民法认为,侵权损害赔偿只具有填补损害的功能。然而,作品作为一种典型的公共产品,著作权人对作品的控制较弱,补偿性损害赔偿难以为著作权提供足够保护。因此,在著作权侵权救济中应引入惩罚性赔偿。同时,考虑到惩罚性赔偿有可能会不合理地限制作品的传播进而影响到社会公众的表达自由,在惩罚性赔偿的适用范围和条件上应当做出一定限制。 相似文献
14.
言论自由、出版自由、新闻自由的主体及其法律保护 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
言论自由的主体是自然人 ,出版自由的主体是自然人和法人 ,新闻自由的主体是法人。法律应当对言论区别不同类型给以相应的保护 ;对出版自由 ,法律既要保护 ,又要限制 ,但二者的界限尚有待明确 ;法律对新闻自由在保护的同时 ,要注意它与公民个人权利、与国家权力、与公众人物的利益发生冲突时应采取不同的调整手段。 相似文献
15.
In this Article, Professor Carlos A. Ball explores the philosophical foundations for the types of rights and benefits that our society currently provides to individuals with disabilities. The concept of autonomy places on society a moral obligation to assist individuals with disabilities when their basic human functional capabilities are impaired. The exercise of this obligation entails assisting individuals with crossing a minimum threshold of functional capabilities below which it is not possible to lead autonomous lives. In making this argument, Professor Ball responds to libertarian critics who contend that notions of freedom or liberty proscribe an activist role for government in this arena. He explains how even a libertarian state redistributes wealth in order to provide for some incapacities. Professor Ball also disputes the idea that the meeting of the needs of the disabled is enough to provide moral justification for the rights and benefits provided to individuals with disabilities. The problem with the concept of needs, Professor Ball argues, is that it fails to account sufficiently for the human good of personal autonomy. 相似文献
16.
17.
在基本权利体系中,人格权是一种旨在保护个人自由的基本权利,表达自由则是一种旨在促进公共参与以及促进公共利益和公共道德的基本权利.在特定情形下,表达自由与人格权所包涵的两种价值追求呈现出一种相互竞争的态势,人格权的实现会对表意人构成限制,而表达自由如果与基本权利之外所谓"公共福祉"之类的法律理由相结合,便会对人格权构成限制.作为当事人的冲突双方尽可通过论证的方式,来为规范性或者评价性陈述提供合理基础,支持自己的权利主张.裁判者则不能任意地限制一项权利,无论如何,冲突需要被衡量. 相似文献
18.
Maclean A 《European journal of health law》2006,13(4):321-338
In this article the author considers whether healthcare professionals should be under a legal duty to persuade their patients to change their minds when they have made an apparently irrational decision. 相似文献
19.
本论文试图评析我国现行刑法对表达自由的规制和保护的现状,并得出结论认为我国刑法没有很好的贯彻言论自由的保护精神.第一,从在现行刑法的425个个罪中,挑选出47个与表达自由相关的个罪.第二,确定评价的精神和具体原则.第三,得出结论认为我国刑法没有很好的贯彻言论自由的保护精神. 相似文献
20.