共查询到14条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ERIC SILVER 《The Political quarterly》1990,61(2):169-176
11.
12.
Ira Sharkansky 《Australian Journal of Public Administration》1978,37(2):144-156
Abstract: There are sharp differences between the public enterprises of Australia and Israel. Australia relies on the structure of statutory authorities for enterprises of the Commonwealth and the States; managers express a narrow view of what is permitted to them; and tend to spend their careers within single firms. "Public" enterprise in Israel reflects a complex amalgam of three public sectors, with Arms owned wholly or in part by the State, the labour federation, and institutions of the international Jewish community. Israel emphasizes the more flexible structure of public sector holdings in limited liability companies. Entrepreneurialism is more apparent in the public enterprises of Israel than Australia, but problems of service delivery are also more apparent in Israel. This article relates national differences in enterprise traits of control by government, styles of management, career patterns and service delivery to the national settings of government structure, economics, and political culture. 相似文献
13.
14.