共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Ernest Lim 《Journal of law and society》2014,41(4):523-550
This article seeks to question the two dominant conceptions of ‘landmark’ or ‘leading’ cases in English legal scholarship, using the House of Lords decision in Salomon v. Salomon Co Ltd. – the most famous case in corporate law – as a case study. It argues that neither the first dominant conception of ‘leading’ or ‘landmark’ cases, characterized by the analysis of the intrinsic merits of a case, nor the second, which looks at the historical contexts in which cases were decided, appears sufficient by itself to determine whether a case is landmark or canonical. Rather, we have to look at how the canonicity of a case is constructed by subsequent courts. The article seeks to advance the debate concerning the formation of landmark cases and aims to challenge certain prevailing views on the canonicity of corporate law's arguably most significant case. 相似文献
16.
《Planning & Environmental Law》2013,65(1):1-16
This is the complete issue of Volume 1, Issue 1, April 1949, Pages 1–16 相似文献
17.
《Planning & Environmental Law》2013,65(4):53-72
This is the complete issue of Volume 4, Issue 4, April 1952, Pages 53–72 相似文献
18.
《Planning & Environmental Law》2013,65(4):73-96
This is the complete issue of Volume 7, Issue 4, April 1955, Pages 73–96 相似文献
19.
《Planning & Environmental Law》2013,65(4):113-152
This is the complete issue of Volume 17, Issue 4, April 1965, Pages 113–152 相似文献
20.
《Planning & Environmental Law》2013,65(4):105-144
This is the complete issue of Volume 12, Issue 4, April 1960, Pages 105–144 相似文献