首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
This article seeks to question the two dominant conceptions of ‘landmark’ or ‘leading’ cases in English legal scholarship, using the House of Lords decision in Salomon v. Salomon Co Ltd. – the most famous case in corporate law – as a case study. It argues that neither the first dominant conception of ‘leading’ or ‘landmark’ cases, characterized by the analysis of the intrinsic merits of a case, nor the second, which looks at the historical contexts in which cases were decided, appears sufficient by itself to determine whether a case is landmark or canonical. Rather, we have to look at how the canonicity of a case is constructed by subsequent courts. The article seeks to advance the debate concerning the formation of landmark cases and aims to challenge certain prevailing views on the canonicity of corporate law's arguably most significant case.  相似文献   

16.
This is the complete issue of Volume 1, Issue 1, April 1949, Pages 1–16  相似文献   

17.
This is the complete issue of Volume 4, Issue 4, April 1952, Pages 53–72  相似文献   

18.
This is the complete issue of Volume 7, Issue 4, April 1955, Pages 73–96  相似文献   

19.
This is the complete issue of Volume 17, Issue 4, April 1965, Pages 113–152  相似文献   

20.
This is the complete issue of Volume 12, Issue 4, April 1960, Pages 105–144  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号