共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Tao Wenzhao 《现代国际关系(英文版)》2012,22(2):80-96,130
A number of government officials and scholars in the U.S. have recently suggested that the country rethink its Taiwan policy, arguing that U.S. arms sales to Taiwan need to be reconsidered. However, the mainstream still emphasizes Taiwan’s strategic value to the U.S. and advocates maintaining the current policy on Taiwan. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
Ni Xiayun 《现代国际关系(英文版)》2007,17(5):70-86
In January 2007, China and Russia vetoed a UN draft resolution on Burma with the result that the Burma issue has become yet another point of conflict between the U.S. and China. Although the Burma issue has been present for nearly 20 years, China and the U.S. have both successfully kept their differences under control. In the short term, it is unlikely that conflict will break out between China and U.S. over Burma. However, in the long term,there is still the possibility that the Burma issue could trigger a conflict between China and the U.S.. 相似文献
10.
11.
The Taiwan issue concerns Chinese people living in the mainland and in Taiwan.Its peaceful resolution can be achieved through negotiations between the two sides.Unprecedented progress has been made since the KMT came back to power in Taiwan.On December 31,2008,at an event to mark the 30th anniversary of the "Message to Compatriots in Taiwan",Chinese President Hu Jintao stressed the need to "deepen cross-Strait exchanges and cooperation",and said that "negotiations should be considered as an important way to promote the peaceful development of cross-Strait relations".On May 20,2012,Ma Ying-jeou said in his second term inaugural speech that:"In the next four years,the two sides of the Taiwan Strait should explore new areas of cooperation,continue to consolidate peace and expand prosperity,and deepen mutual trust". 相似文献
12.
14.
Liu Liping 《现代国际关系(英文版)》2008,18(4):1-11
In the early 1950s, Kenneth W. Waltz's book Man, State and War laid the cornerstone for a new branch of international relations theory called the Level of Analysis. The author of this paper believes that Sino-U.S. relations can be studied in a similar multi-dimensional way. Among Waltz's three images, the world strategic structure, i.e. the international image, has been the most decisive factor in the development of Sino-U.S. relations over most of the past 40 years. 相似文献
15.
On August 1-2, China and the United States held a strategic dialogue. This is in fact the first mechanized strategic dialogue between China and America. Both sides decided to hold such a dialogue alternatively in each other's capital twice a year.The significance of the first comprehensive and mechanized senior dialogue between the two sides to discuss strategic issues of common interest cannot be underestimated. Therefore, it was an event that attracted worldwide attention. Apart from paying attention tothe dialogue itself, the media hope to fully understand the cause of the dialogue, the result of the first strategic talk, the influence of the talk on bilateral relations. The Editorial Department of Contemporary International Relations invited scholars from the Institute of American studies of China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations to hold a discussion to provide our readers some food for thought over relevant issues. 相似文献
16.
中美关系从两国建交后的一波三折逐渐演变成今天比较正常的国家关系,除了中国在两国关系的改善和发展上做出重要努力外,双方强劲的经贸合作带来的双赢也起到到了极其重要的作用。随着中国经济实力的提升,经济因素在中美关系中的分量和影响还将进一步增强。 相似文献
17.
2006年,国际格局调整加快,世界热点问题升温,大国协调进一步展开,中国外交硕果累累。2007年,世界将进入深度调整,国际形势总体趋向缓和,但局部紧张可能加剧,尤其是伊朗核问题有可能升级,中国外交则在面对新机遇的同时有可能遭遇更复杂的挑战。鉴此,《现代国际关系》编辑部于2007年1月6日举办“2007年国际大势前瞻”研讨会,特别邀请30多位京内外专家学者在总结、回顾2006年国际形势的基础上,着重对2007年国际形势及中国外交的变化趋势进行前瞻性分析。现将研讨会主要观点辑录如下,以期有助于读者更准确把握国际形势走向。 相似文献
18.
自2003年3月23日美国发动伊拉克战争迄今已历四年。四年来,美国软硬实力、内政外交因为这场战争而发生了什么样的变化?国际战略形势又随之出现了哪些变迁?对中国而言,加速发展的战略机遇期是否还将持续?伊拉克战争本身又带来哪些启示?围绕这些问题,《现代国际关系》编辑部举办了“伊拉克战争四周年国际战略形势”专题研讨会,邀请一些知名国际问题专家进行了深入探讨。现将与会专家学者的主要观点辑录刊发,以期对读者更好地理解和把握这些问题有所裨益。 相似文献
19.
20.
Li Xuefei 《现代国际关系(英文版)》2007,17(5):59-69
The United States has criticized the domestic and foreign policies of the Mugabe regime, and has attempted to raise the Zimbabwe issue in the UN Security Council, thus creating a point of potential conflict in Sino-U.S. relations.China differs from the United States on this issue not because of the measures taken by the Western countries such as economic sanctions and political pressure, but,more significantly, because of the Western conception of democracy and human rights, and the difference between the U.S. and Chinese strategies in Africa. The policies of China and the United States on the Zimbabwe issue can be interpreted as a struggle between two powers in Africa. In the short term, however, it is the Middle East that will continue to preoccupy U.S. foreign policy, and Zimbabwe will not become a major flash point in Sino-U.S. relations. 相似文献