全球气候治理中的南北关系

气候变化问题是当今人类社会面临的主要全球性公共问题之一。全球大气空间是典型的全球公共资源,它在消费上具有竞争性,但是在使用上却不具有排他性,因此这一公共资源很容易被过度使用,从而引发气候变化问题上的“公地悲剧”。有效应对气候变化需要广泛的国际合作,     

借力借势,合作共赢——"新兴大国与全球治理"国际研讨会纪要

2010年9月14-15日,中国当代世界研究中心和德国卢森堡基金会在京联合举办了＂新兴大国与全球治理＂国际研讨会,来自德国、荷兰、印度、俄罗斯、巴西、印度尼西亚以及中国社会科学院、北京大学、现代国际关系研究院、中国国际问题研究所等近40位学者政要与会,就大国崛起的经验教训、金融危机后新兴大国的发展走势、新兴大国合作的现状与前景及新兴大国与国际新秩序等议题展开了热烈讨论。     

Assessing Aid and Global Governance

This analysis argues for a system of global economic, social and political governance in which development aid is part of wider global redistributive mechanisms to foster social progress and development in the twenty-first century. The study provides two arguments in favour of setting up a new system of global governance, and the role of aid in such a new system. First, since in the current international economic system aid cannot cope with adverse external shocks, a new system of global governance is necessary in order to protect LDCs from the volatility of the international economic system. Second, it is argued that a new system of global governance is needed to improve redistribution at the global level to foster social progress and development.     

金砖国家崛起与全球治理体系

后金融危机时期的世界面临三大机遇同时也是三大挑战。其一,全球治理体系进入一个新阶段：美国提供公共产品的能力下降;联合国体系难以适应新的全球问题;传统大国和新兴大国开始共同设定全球治理的议程。     

全球治理进程中的政府改革

全球治理既是一种内涵丰富的崭新理论,又是一种客观历史发展进程.作为一种理论,它是对传统政治学所体现的国家统治理念的超越,反映了当代国际政治发展到全球政治新阶段在政治结构、政治主体、管理方式的新变化、新特点.作为一种客观发展进程,它是冷战结束后国际政治经济秩序发展的新形态,是国际规制有效性的现实要求,是全球公民社会和世界民主潮流的产物.全球化和全球治理既对国家主权和政府有效管理提出了严峻的挑战,也为政府改革提供了有益的思路,这就是,以治理与善治思想为指导,以公民社会成长为依托,以充分发挥市场机制在资源配置中的基础作用为前提,转变政府职能和行为方式,让市场、国家(政府)和公民社会三者在各自的作用范围内发挥作用.     

"Global Civil Society" and the Political Depoliticization of Global Governance

Activists, officials, and academics alike have often linked observations about an emerging global civil society to an incipient democratization of world politics. Global civil society is assumed to bring public scrutiny and "bottom-up" politics to international decision making "from outside" formal political institutions. Based on an analysis of uses of the concept of global civil society in 1990s global governance discourse (especially related to the major UN world conferences), this paper argues that the presumed democratization of world politics is better understood in terms of a double movement: on the one hand, "global civil society" depoliticizes global governance through the promotion of "human security" and "social development"; on the other hand, the emerging international public sphere (in the UN context) operates as a subsystem of world politics rather than opposing the system from outside. Practices of depoliticization are thus part of the political logic of (neo-)liberal global governance. The argument draws on Luhmann's systems theory and Foucault's analysis of governmentality.     

全球治理中的中国进程:以中国减贫治理为例

随着新兴大国的崛起,传统上由西方世界主导的全球治理体系开始受到来自世界多极化的挑战。以减贫领域为例,中国国内贫困治理的成功经验为全球减贫治理提供了多样化的解决方案。中国减贫治理强调主权国家在贫困治理中的主导性作用,国内各种社会力量的整合运用,通过发展解决贫困问题,立足国情、有效利用国际援助及对外援助的去意识形态化。中国开始将这些来自国内实践的有效经验合理整合到全球减贫议程中,促进相关治理机制改革及内容调整,进而为其他发展中国家的国内贫困治理提供极具参考价值的理念和方法。     

国际货币体系呼唤全球治理

在2009年4月18日,博鳌亚洲论坛2009年开幕大会上,温家宝总理发表了题为《增强信心、深化合作、实现共赢》的主旨演讲。在演讲中,温总理再次表明了中国对改革国际货币体系的态度,指出“要推进国际金融体系改革,提高新兴市场和发展中国家的代表性和发言权,加强对主要储备货币发行经济体宏观经济政策的监督,     

全球治理新思考:发展中国家的视角

当今世界,全球化加速发展,学术界新兴的全球治理理论作为一种新的调色方法,从新的视角搭配着世界调色板的色彩方案。本文以发展中国家的视角进行分析、批判,旨在对全球治理理论的不足与缺失进行修补,希望使之更加全面、丰富、人性。     

"全球治理"的置疑性解读

十几年来,"全球治理"已经成为国际政治学术领域里最流行的学说之一."全球治理"的理念源于西方,是西方核心价值观的传承与发展,并试图使其"普世化".中国学术界近年来大量引进了"全球治理"的有关著作和文章.     

促进G20在全球经济治理中的核心作用

“多伦多”在印第安语中指的是“会面之地”,不知是巧合还是有意为之,主办国加拿大将此次G20峰会安排在了这座位于安大略湖畔的美丽城市。在新世纪头十年已成过去的时间节点,各国领袖在此“会面”,讨论世界经济复苏、国际体系改革等关系人类生存发展的全球性问题。     

Renewing Global Governance: demanding rights and justice in the global South

Global inequality is increasing. Global inequalities are an expression of global social injustices and ‘pathologies of power’. Global governance has been posited as a way forward. However, global governance will not deliver justice unless it embraces a more radical vision of what justice means and permits the voices of the marginalised to be heard in spaces of decision making. We identify two important approaches to building more just forms of global governance: the civil society approach, which is useful when it draws attention to the agency of those at the margins of global circuits of power; and the rights-based approach, which can provide opportunities for justice claims by marginalised groups.     

全球治理新观察与中国角色再思考

新兴大国的群体性崛起对长期以来主要由西方主导的国际体系造成了强烈冲击,也使全球治理结构发生了前所未有的深刻变革。在谋求建立国际政治经济新秩序的过程中,新兴大国之间有着广阔的合作空间和巨大的合作潜力,但要真正成为全球治理中的重要一员,尚有很长的路要走。新的时代背景需要新的战略思维,究竟以何种身份和角色参与全球治理进程,进而推动国际秩序朝向真正公正合理方向发展,是摆在中国面前的一个兼具理论价值和现实意义的重大战略课题。     

The Gx Global Governance:China Faces G20 Leadership

<正>The Enlarging Gx Leadership Since the2005G7/8summit at Gleneagles,China's leader and the leaders of the other G5 countries-China,India,Brazil,South Africa     

全球金融治理中霸权稳定论和多边主义思想初探

当前全球金融治理成为研究的热点。在全球金融治理中,到底应该反映主要个别成员国的意志还是平等地反映所有成员国的意志,长期以来,在国际合作领域一直存在类似的争论,即霸权稳定论思想和多边主义思想之间的争论。本文将从多角度对全球金融治理中的霸权稳定论和多边主义思想进行初步的讨论,进而分析哪一种思想比较适合当前的全球金融治理。     

Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: the political economy of Turkey in the age of brics

The rise of bric s presents a major challenge to the existing global order. A second category of emerging powers, which may be labelled near- bric s, have also displayed increasing pro-activism in recent years in terms of influencing the regional balance of power politics, in addition to their growing presence in international organisations and global affairs. It is in this context that we aim to examine Turkey as a striking example of a ‘near- bric ’ power, a country that has adopted an increasingly assertive and independent style of foreign policy with aspirations to establish itself as a major regional actor. Using the Turkish experience as a reference point, this paper aims to understand the extent to which near- bric countries possess the economic capacity, sustainable growth performance and soft-power capabilities needed to establish themselves as significant regional and global actors. The recent Turkish experience clearly highlights both the potential and the limits of regional power activism on the part of emerging powers from the ‘global South’.     

中国参与全球治理的地方支持——兼论长三角次区域的地方全球联系与责任

全球化时代的加速推进、全球性问题的凸显,以及中国走和平发展道路的实际需要,都促使中国参与全球治理。在这一进程中,中国地方为中国参与全球治理,提供了政治经济动力、建制经验与智力支持。长三角次区域作为中国沿海三大经济区域之一,其突出的地方全球联系促进了区域内经济社会发展,并承担起国际组织落地、国际社区形成、国际智力开发以至分散外交压力等责任。随着改革开放的深化,中国外交既需要国际制度的内化,也要有央地关系的优化,以实现对外关系和国内发展的相互促进。     

The Process Is the Message: The IMF Leadership and Global Governance

The further we get from the crisis moment of the global financial meltdown in 2008–2009, the weaker the momentum to establish an effective system of global governance. Gordon Brown, the former prime minister of Great Britain who hosted the most successful G‐20 conclave in London at the apex of the crisis, laments the complacency that has taken over. With the scandalous departure of Dominique Strauss‐Kahn as head of the International Monetary Fund, a global debate has opened up over whether the emerging economies should have a greater voice in that institution. Nobel laureate Michael Spence comments.