Rambus案最新进展与政府在标准化制度中的作用

介绍标准中知识产权Rambus一案的最新进展,分析支持FTC申请美国最高法院实施案件审查的"法庭之友"文件,建议为了保证标准化制度的正常运行,政府应当对于由私有组织控制的标准化制度加强管理,考虑采取反垄断法作为规制的法律基础,以促进市场竞争,保护消费者和公共利益.     

房屋买卖合同中的陷阱及法律救济

开发商和购房人之间的权利义务关系规定在购房合同中。由开发商单方面提供的格式合同已提前确定了本应由双方协商的合同条款。本文以某房屋买卖合同为例，指出在房屋买卖合同中常见的不公平、不舍法条款，针对房屋买卖合同中的陷阱提出法律救济途径。     

Rambus专利侵权诉讼与标准中知识产权的管理

创新是信息社会发展的基本动力,标准化是合作创新的重要形式.但是如何管理标准化过程中由多个标准制订者拥有的知识产权,成为人们日益关注的热点问题.     

The appraisal remedy and merger premiums

The appraisal remedy affords corporate shareholders the optionto redeem their shares for cash in the event of certain transactions,including mergers. Access to appraisal for publicly traded shares,however, differs from state to state. We present the first large-sampleempirical study of the effect of appraisal rights on targetshareholder gains from acquisitions. We examine 1,350 mergersinvolving publicly held firms. We find some evidence that appraisalreduces average shareholder gains in transactions involvingself-interested managers. For the entire sample, however, wefind no evidence that appraisal has any effect, positive ornegative, on target shareholder gains from takeovers.     

Physician organizations: two years under the FTC/DOJ guidelines

The joint antitrust enforcement statement for physician networks was designed in part to dispel uncertainty in the physician community about antitrust agency law enforcement intentions. In the two years since its issuance, the antitrust agencies have generally, but not always, been consistent in applying the methodology and standards set forth in their enforcement statement. Even though agency pronouncements like the enforcement statement are not binding on private parties or the federal courts, both the statement and subsequent advisory opinions and business review letters have been exceptionally helpful, if not always encouraging, to health care providers in their antitrust planning efforts.     

Toward a theory of jurisdictional competition: the case of the Japanese FTC

The Japanese antitrust agency (the J-FTC) holds a jurisdictionalmonopoly over most issues. Because overlapping jurisdictionswould enable politicians to gauge relative bureaucratic performance,this monopoly prevents politicians from monitoring the agencyon most issues. In response, J-FTC bureaucrats have chosen notto enforce those statutory provisions like criminal penaltiesthat firms might contest, and firms face virtually no criminalsanctions for antitrust violations. Most Japanese markets arestill competitive—but primarily because they are large,fluid, and easy to enter. The J-FTC enforces the law only inareas where politicians can monitor its performance, and politicianshave the information they need to monitor only on issues aboutwhich they care deeply. Although monopolist agencies will regulateless actively than competitive agencies, politicians do notwin elections by creating agencies they cannot control, andeven monopolist agencies will regulate actively when politicianscan gauge their performance. In equilibrium, therefore, politicianswill grant agencies a jurisdictional monopoly over electorallyimportant issues only when they have access through other sourcesfor information by which they can monitor their bureaucrats.     

药品不良反应的法律定性及其后果的救济

药品不良反应致人损害的救济是我国法律规制的盲区。药品不良反应类型包括药品常见且可预期的不良反应、常见且可预期之外的不良反应以及特异体质型药物过敏反应。其中，常见且可预期之外的不良反应对药品使用者而言应属不合理的危险，也即药品本身存在缺陷，消费者因此遭受损害理应得到法律救济。另外，对遭受特异体质型药物过敏反应的受害者则应从社会补偿的角度给予考虑，而不应让其独自承担不幸。     

提高行政救济实效性的若干思考

行政救济制度的存在,就是要给予公民及时有效的救济.提高行政救济的实效性,要从拓宽救济渠道,完善救济程序,扩大救济范围,增强救济力度等多方面入手.     

The right to an effective remedy in European law: significance,content and interaction

China-EU Law Journal - One of the basic rights and a general principle of the European Union is the right to an effective remedy. In the paper is presented the basis of the right to an effective...     

The "new" genetics: emerging medicolegal issues in the prenatal issues in the prenatal diagnosis of hereditary disorders.

Major advances in prenatal genetic diagnosis have occurred in the past few years which pose difficult challenges to the law. This paper raises questions relative to family history taking, genetic counseling, carrier detection, amniocentesis, and prenatal genetic studies, and also raises questions with respect to the rights and responsibilities of the patient, the fetus, the physician, and society in light of such modern advances. Law reform often occurs only after prior harm to an individual, family or group. Perception and delineation of the most important issues in this area should serve to stimulate the development of medicolegal guidelines and corrective legislation prior to the occurrence of a genetic tragedy.     

论经济法的可诉性缺陷及其弥补

经济法的可诉性是经济法所必备的为了判断经济纠纷的是非而使诉讼主体可诉求于法律公设之判断主体的基本属性,它是经济冲突尖锐化的必然产物,也回应了经济法的独立性和经济权利司法救济的现实性和可能性.但是,经济诉权理论研究几乎是一片空白,致使我国现行的经济法律法规中不可诉现象大量存在,导致经济审判功能严重错位.因此,为顺应市场经济持续、健康、快速发展的客观需要,应当突破传统三大诉讼的现有观念,刨设一种新型的诉讼模型,即经济诉讼,并赋予它区别于其他三大诉讼,尤其是区别于民事诉讼的根本标志.     

“在场的不在场”——论刑事被害人权利的缺失与补救

刑事被害人作为直接受害人，其权利无论在法律中还是在司法实践中一直遭受冷遇。在刑事诉讼中，被害人不仅承受着实体利益的丧失，程序权利亦未得到有效保护，适种权利保护薄弱背後有其深刻的社会动因。鉴于刑事被害人现实的权利境遇，完善刑事被害人权利的保护措施自然至关重要。     

药品不良反应的法律定性及其后果的救济

药品不良反应致人损害的救济是我国法律规制的盲区。药品不良反应类型包括药品常见且可预期的不良反应、常见且可预期之外的不良反应以及特异体质型药物过敏反应。其中,常见且可预期之外的不良反应对药品使用者而言应属不合理的危险,也即药品本身存在缺陷,消费者因此遭受损害理应得到法律救济。另外,对遭受特异体质型药物过敏反应的受害者则应从社会补偿的角度给予考虑,而不应让其独自承担不幸。