Toxicology case data reporting system

A computerized system has been organized to serve the toxicology sections of seven R.C.M.P. laboratories across Canada. Scientists may view and retrieve information concerning drugs and drug combinations, blood and liver drug concentrations, etc. from cases of sudden death or impaired driving which were analyzed in the laboratories. This has proven to be a great help in interpreting toxicology case results for the investigator or the courts and also in choosing methodology to be used in analyzing specimens for unusual drugs or poisons.     

Medicare program; uniform electronic cost reporting system for hospitals--HCFA. Final rule

This final rule responds to comments on the May 25, 1994, final rule with comment period that implemented a standardized electronic cost reporting system for all hospitals under the Medicare program. In that rule, we solicited comments on the requirement that cost reporting software be able to detect changes made to the electronic file after the provider has submitted it to the fiscal intermediary. This final rule responds to comments on that requirement and clarifies that although changes to the "as-filed" electronic cost report are prohibited, an intermediary makes a working copy of the as-filed electronic cost report for use in the settlement process.     

Medical device reporting: manufacturer reporting, importer reporting, user facility reporting, distributor reporting--FDA. Direct final rule; withdrawal

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published in the Federal Register of May 12, 1998, a proposed rule (63 FR 26129) and a direct final rule (63 FR 26069) to implement amendments to the medical device reporting provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA). The comment period closed July 27, 1998. FDA is withdrawing the direct final rule because the agency received significant adverse comment.     

Medical devices; hematology and pathology devices; classification of cord blood processing system and storage container. Final rule

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying a cord blood processing system and storage container into class II (special controls). The special control that will apply to this device is the guidance document entitled "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Cord Blood Processing System and Storage Container." FDA is classifying this device into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of this device. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of the guidance document that will serve as the special control for this device.     

Medicare program; uniform electronic cost reporting system for hospitals--HCFA. Final rule with comment period

This final rule with comment period implements the provisions of section 4007(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, as amended by section 411(b)(6) of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988, which require the Secretary to place into effect a standardized electronic cost reporting system for all hospitals under the Medicare program. Under this final rule with comment period, all hospitals are required to submit their cost reports, for hospital cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1989, in a uniform electronic format. The Secretary may grant a delay or a waiver of this requirement where implementation could result in financial hardship for a hospital.     

Medicare program; demonstration project to develop a uniform cost reporting system for hospitals--HCFA. Final rule

This final rule responds to public comments on the August 25, 1989, interim final rule with comment period that established a demonstration project to develop a uniform cost reporting system for hospitals under the Medicare program. Under that rule, all hospitals in the States of California and Colorado were required to participate in the demonstration project. In addition, since the demonstration project ended on June 29, 1992, this final rule removes the relevant provisions from the Code of Federal Regulations.     

Government & education news

Abstract

THIS ARTICLE details research which attempts to assess what effect electronic delivery of law modules has on actual student assessment performance. The authors reviewed the assessment results of students who had taken both conventionally and electronically delivered modules and compared and contrasted individual student performances in all the modules studied by them in a particular semester. As far as the authors’ researches were able to ascertain this was a relatively unique piece of research as far as legal study is concerned. We found that weaker students (those who might ordinarily fail or scrape a bare pass) were achieving a mark some 10% higher than that achieved in the conventionally delivered modules; pushing those students into the lower second category—the assessment criteria for such classification demanding evidence of deep as opposed to surface learning. However there was little or no difference in the marks achieved by upper second quality students.

The authors acknowledge that many factors affect the quality of assessment performance and that, whilst the article addresses some of the variables, any specific conclusions based on results alone are open to question.

Furthermore, we accept the limitations of a small and narrow statistical sample and that therefore this can only be a survey rather than a controlled experiment.

Nevertheless we believe that as part of the debate on the role of Communication &; Information Technology (C &; IT) it has a useful role to play.

Inevitably an article such as this trespasses on many pedagogical issues deserving debate which goes beyond the objectives of this discussion.