Applying competitive bidding to health care

This paper reviews the empirical literature on competitive bidding for health services under public programs and, in this context, discusses the major issues that must be confronted in designing bidding systems. These issues include the specification of units of service, the selection of winning bidders, the determination of reimbursement for winning bidders, the treatment of losing bidders, and contract enforcement. The paper then illustrates these issues in practice by outlining one possible competitive bidding system for purchases and rentals of durable medical equipment under the Medicare program.     

Predatory bidding in competitive tenders: A Swedish case study

Public procurement by competitive tendering is an important part of European policies to encourage competition in network industries previously dominated by public companies. In recent years, the appearance of very low bids has become an issue in several countries. We discuss predatory bidding from a theoretical, practical and legislative point of view. A case of tendering for train services in Sweden is used to illustrate the possibilities to detect an abnormally low bid. An analysis of projected costs and revenues is complemented with a method using historical data on previous tenders. One conclusion is that there is scope for reform in national competition policies in European Union member states concerning multinational enterprises participating in local tenders. JEL Classification K21 · K23 · L12 · L43 · L92     

Medicare program; establishment of the Medicare Advantage Program; interpretation. Final rule; interpretation

This final rule clarifies our interpretation of the meaning of "entity" in the final rule titled "Medicare Program; Establishment of the Medicare Advantage Program" published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2005 (70 FR 4588). Subsequent to the publication of the Medicare Advantage (MA) final rule on January 28, 2005, we have received inquiries from parties interested in offering an MA Regional Plan concerning whether they could jointly enter into a contract with us to offer a single MA Regional Plan in a multistate region. The participating health plans wish to contract with each other to create a single "joint enterprise." They have asked us whether such a joint enterprise could be considered an "entity" under sections 1859(a)(1)and 1855(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, for purposes of offering an MA Regional Plan. The MA final rule is scheduled to take effect on March 22, 2005. Our interpretation of the word "entity" that follows in the "Supplementary Information" section of this final rule is deemed to be included in that final rule.     

Considerations in Medicare reform: the impact of Medicare preemption on state laws

This article explores the key issues involved in understanding the impact of Medicare preemption on state laws affecting the federal purchase of managed care products, as a consideration in future Medicare reform. Author Commander Jackonis argues that any further Medicare reform must address the impact of federal preemption on quality and quantity of care purchased in order to ensure the existence of a market of product providers, as well as to ensure protection of patient rights and benefits.     

Medicare program; payment to health maintenance organizations and competitive medical plans--HCFA. Final rules with comment period

These regulations implement section 114 of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 by authorizing Medicare reimbursement for health care services to eligible health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and competitive medical plans (CMPs) on a prospective basis for those entities that have a risk contract or on a reasonable cost basis for those that have a cost contract. The regulations set forth the requirements that an entity must meet in order to be: Eligible to enter into a Medicare contract (either risk or reasonable cost) as an eligible organization; and Reimbursed by Medicare on a capitation basis (either prospectively or retrospectively) for items and services furnished to Medicare enrollees. In addition, these regulations implement sections 2322 and 2350 (b) and (c) of Pub. L. 98-369 (Deficit Reduction Act of 1984), which further amended the Social Security Act concerning payments to HMOs and CMPs.     

Medicare program; establishment of an expedited review process for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in health maintenance organizations, competitive medical plans, and health care prepayment plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period

This final rule with comment period establishes a new administrative review requirement for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in health maintenance organizations (HMOs), competitive medical plans (CMPs), and health care prepayment plans (HCPPs). This rule implements section 1876(c)(5) of the Social Security Act, which specifies the appeal and grievance rights for Medicare enrollees in HMOs and CMPs. This rule requires that an HMO, CMP, or HCPP establish and maintain, as part of the health plan's appeals procedures, an expedited process for making organization determinations and reconsidered determinations when an adverse determination could seriously jeopardize the life or health of the enrollee or the enrollee's ability to regain maximum function. This rule also revises the definition of appealable determinations to clarify that it includes a decision to discontinue services.     

Medicare program; revision of the Medicare Economic Index--HCFA. Final rule

Before January 1, 1992, Medicare payments for physicians' services under Part B were limited by the Medicare Economic Index (MEI), which capped prevailing charges. Beginning January 1, 1992, Medicare payments for physicians' services under Part B are made based on a fee schedule. Annual updates to the conversion factor used in establishing the physician fee schedule are based in part on the MEI. This final rule revises the method used to calculate the MEI to more accurately reflect year-to-year price changes affecting the cost of providing physicians' services, thus ensuring appropriate adjustment of Medicare payments.     

Paying for the Medicare program

Although the hospital insurance (HI) trust fund acted as a source of strength for the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program during its recent financial crises, projections by HCFA and CBO reveal that the Medicare program will experience financing problems of its own within the next decade. No one would argue that Medicare's financing problems should be solved simply by raising more money. However, the prospect of insolvency in the HI trust fund and the increasing strain on general revenues from the Supplementary Medical Insurance trust fund require policymakers to survey the options for increasing Medicare revenues while cost-control devices are being developed. Indeed, even if cost-control efforts are completely successful, additional revenues may be needed in the future to finance new initiatives in the Medicare program. Therefore, this paper will look briefly at current efforts to regain control of soaring hospital and physician costs and then examine some of the more feasible options for increasing Medicare revenues.