委托书公证该怎么办——从侵权责任角度谈房屋委托书公证涉诉案件常见问题

最高人民法院2011年修正的《民事案件案由规定》,明确将侵权责任纠纷案由提升为第一级案由,并将公证损害责任纠纷案由列为其项下的第三级案由。在法院立案和审理过程中．明确将涉及公证机构的房屋委托书赔偿案件．按照公证损害责任纠纷立案和审理。从立法和司法实践中可以看出．房屋委托书公证赔偿案件．是作为一种特殊的侵权责任纠纷案件处理的．因此．笔者将从法院审理侵权责任案件的角度．就审理中涉房屋委托书公证赔偿案件常见的问题进行分析．并提出相关建议．以期对公证行业日后业务的开展有所帮助。     

委托书公证该怎么办

从侵权责任角度谈房屋委托书公证涉诉案件常见问题 卢秋 北京市海淀区人民法院 最高人民法院2011年修正的《民事案件案由规定》,明确将侵权责任纠纷案由提升为第一级案由,并将公证损害责任纠纷案由列为其项下的第三级案由.在法院立案和审理过程中,明确将涉及公证机构的房屋委托书赔偿案件,按照公证损害责任纠纷立案和审理.从立法和司法实践中可以看出,房屋委托书公证赔偿案件,是作为一种特殊的侵权责任纠纷案件处理的,因此,笔者将从法院审理侵权责任案件的角度,就审理中涉房屋委托书公证赔偿案件常见的问题进行分析,并提出相关建议,以期对公证行业日后业务的开展有所帮助.     

时事点击

基层法院立案信访窗口覆盖率超过90％ 全国法院司法便民利民措施更加完备，基层法院立案信访窗口覆盖率达90．1％，有14个省份达到100％。据了解，全国各级法院恢复、新建和调整人民法庭，保障人民群众司法需求，近5年新投入资金19．6亿元，新增立案信访窗口建设面积36．6万平方米，为当事人提供诉讼引．导、诉前调解、立案受理、诉调对接、判后答疑等“一站式、全方位、多层次、低成本”司法服务，使立案信访窗口服务水平大大提升。     

北京铁路运输法院精心打造人性化立案和信访服务窗口

今年以来，北京铁路运输法院积极完善立案和信访服务工作中的便民、利民措施，提升立案和信访接待队伍的综合素质，努力在立案和信访工作中充分体现司法人文关怀，精心打造人性化的立案和信访服务窗口。     

试论法院立案工作公开化

为进一步提高立案工作的透明度，保障人民群众对人民法院立案工作的知情权和监督权，保证当事人依法行使诉讼权利，《最高人民法院关于司法公开的六项规定》中将立案公开作为司法公开的一项内容作了规定，立案公开无疑将对人民法院的廉政建设和提升司法公信力起到极其重要的积极作用。但是，如何解决立案难，如何让立案公开真正落到实处。本文试图从立案公开的理论依据、内容、途径及意义进行分析，提出立案工作公开化要真正落到实处，不仅要更新立案工作理念，而且要对法院的立案工作公开进行。     

民事执行几个实践问题研析

民事执行几个实践问题研析叶向东一关于立案执行的问题司法实践中，有的法院采取“申请执行人不能提供被执行人基本状况和可供执行的财产状况，则不能立案执行，但认可其保留申请执行的权利”的作法。某些法院甚至要求申请执行人负完全的举证责任，否则不予立案执行。对此...     

关于强制执行公证若干问题的探讨

特定公证书具有司法执行力为大陆法系国家公证制度的特点,是拉丁公证制度的传统。《拉丁公证制度的起源及其发展趋势》一文说：“拉丁公证制度在其发展过程中．形成了一些特殊原则，公证文书具有无可怀疑的执行力。拉丁公证制度规定，对于追索金钱物品的债权文书．如果债务人不能履行其给付义务并经过一定时限．债权人有权依据公证文书副本径直向法院申请执行，无须另经法院的审判程序。”     

破解行政案件立案难——以纵向监督机制运行的实证研究为视角

"立案难"问题是行政诉讼的"老大难",立案权配置和监督也一直是困扰中基层法院立案部门的现实难题。法院内部的行政立案权纵向监督机制在实际运行中存在诸多问题,需要予以完善,以期能破解"立案难",保护当事人诉权,保障法院公正司法,提升司法公信形象。     

论公证人的判断义务（上）

一、本文主旨及“判断”一词的基本含义 公证活动中,公证人是否负有判断义务?这一问题的提出首先和公证的特性不无关系。 习惯上,人们往往将公证和法院司法作对比。西班牙法谚有“多开一家公证处就意味着要倒闭一家法院”这种近乎极端的说法。作为法律职业共同体的一个有机组成部分,公证有着和法院     

实施立案调解 创新解纷模式——广东省东莞市中级人民法院立案调解工作纪实

在全国法院立案审判工作会议上,最高人民法院提出把强化立案调解工作,增强化解矛盾纠纷的能力作为立案庭在新时期提高司法能力、增强司法水平的工作任务和要求。东莞     

论我国法官选任制度的重构

2002年7月18日,最高人民法院发布了《关于加强法官队伍职业化建设的若干意见》,提出了法官职业化的目标,而法官职业化目标的实现,最关键的是改革和完善现有的法官选任制度,把真正高素质的法律人才选拔到人民法院。因此,提高法官任职的社会阅历条件、明确法官选任程序、建立严格科学的考核制度,建立起符合法官职业化特点的完备的法官选任制度十分必要。     

法庭警察权研究

法庭警察权乃法院为维护法庭秩序及审判的威严所享有的采取秩序措施及施加秩序罚的权力。法庭警察权有妨害预防作用、妨害排除作用与妨害制裁作用三种基本形态。基于法庭秩序维护的实效性与法庭警察权实施基础的客观实在性,法庭警察权依附于裁判权,由担当裁判权的法院行使。法庭警察权以功能意义上的法庭为其实施的时空范围,以妨害法庭秩序及审判威严的行为及状态为规制对象。对于妨害法庭秩序的行为实施何种作用形态的法庭警察权取决于法院的合目的性裁量,应受比例原则的规制。法庭警察权在我国由三大诉讼法分别规范,不仅未能科学地体认法庭警察权的性质,也未能正确地廓清法庭警察权应有的实施边界,加剧了司法实务中法庭警察权制度适用之乱象,亟待统一立法构建。     

法院“人财物”问题研究——以法院审判权的独立行使为视角

我国之所以出现法院对地方政府的依赖以及地方政府对法院审判权的不当干预现象,根本原因在于目前法院的"人财物"管理方式存在制度性缺陷,即法院行政化的人事制度、依赖政府财政拨款的经费保障制度与现代审判权的运行规律存有内在冲突。它"后台"式地消解着法院的独立性,必须建立以符合法官职业特性和审判权运行规律的"人财物"管理制度,这是审判权独立运行的基石。     

Entering the Australian Judiciary: Gender and Court Hierarchy

There is considerable attention to increasing judicial diversity along a range of dimensions, in particular, gender. Women remain underrepresented in many courts, especially at the higher levels of the judiciary. A comprehensive socio‐legal study of the Australian judiciary compares experiences and attitudes of women who have become judicial officers at different levels of the court hierarchy. Understanding their personal and professional backgrounds and the features that attracted them to the judiciary has important implications for addressing gender disparity. Effective recruitment and selection must focus on the expectations and experiences of women in relation to particular judicial contexts.     

The use of technology in the transformation of business dispute resolution

The use of technology in dispute resolution mechanism can be viewed from two perspectives: first, as an aid in the conventional dispute resolution system, and second, as an online dispute resolution mechanism via the Internet. Online dispute resolution (ODR) is transforming the way disputes are being resolved, in particular, in business to consumer (B2C) transactions. ODR offers a more successful means of resolving e-commerce disputes. In fact, there is a new move by the Malaysian judiciary to transform its court system. Previously, the judiciary has been very conventional in its administration of justice, and the system is said to be slow and outdated. The court system in Malaysia has been frequently criticised because of its dilatoriness in resolving disputes, resulting in a large backlog of cases. To overcome these problems, the judiciary has introduced a new system called the e-court. New methods including as e-filing, electronic case management, queue management, and court recording and transcribing form the complete e-court mechanism.     

中国民事执行难问题的再解读 ——法院权能的视角

在法律治理化背景下,中国法院是国家能力体系的有机组成部分,其组织目标的实现程度取决于自身权能的强弱。我国民事案件执行难的根源在于法院权能不足,具体表现在资源汲取权能、组织协作权能、正当化权能和强制权能四个维度。集中清理活动中法院的自我政治化、行政化,模糊权力边界,扩大参与主体范围,以及执行方式的灵活性和执行目标的民生导向等,从不同层面补足了法院权能,促成执行联动的新格局。这种非常规的运动式执行活动暂时消解了执行难问题,却导致政治吸纳司法的非预期后果。执行难的最终化解依赖于常规执行中法院权能的补强,尤其是法院政治地位的提高,而非固守审执分离、司法独立、当事人主义执行模式等理论信条。要排除执行乱的话语干扰,厘清法院执行工作的责任边界,以实现民事执行工作的理性回归。     

Challenges and Changes in Dutch Family Law

Since the “Divorce Challenge” in the Netherlands, a lot of initiatives have been taken on a political level, from the judiciary and in practice, to improve the situation for children of separation. Experimental legislation is on its way to enable the development of new court procedures. One of its ideas is to introduce a so‐called family's representative. This new professional, a lawyer or mediator, can represent both parents in court or coordinate the entire divorce process, both before and after the court procedure.     

二审全面审查制度应当废除

我国《刑事诉讼法》明确规定了二审全面审查原则。这个原则作为一种制度,使二审法院必须要对当事人没有上诉、检察机关也没有抗诉的一审判决中认定的事实部分或法律适用部分进行全面的审理。这个制度,既不符合刑事诉讼中控审分离的基本原理,违背了现代司法制度中审判中立的基本原则,也不符合诉讼经济原则和世界各国的普遍做法。因此,应当在修改《刑事诉讼法》时废除这一制度。     

欧洲国家宪法法官制度初论

在20世纪,欧洲生成并发展出颇具特色的宪法法院制度,宪法法官作为宪法法院的决策主体承担了保障宪政生活中的合宪性这一重要使命。它们普遍建立了精英型宪法法官体系,通过任命机制控制宪法法官构成,使之具有合理性;同时,它们极力保障宪法法官的独立性,为其提供充分的权利保障及物质支持,并通过严格规范职业行为来保障宪法法官有效履行职责。     

THE PRESS AND THE JUDICIARY： COURT AND JUDICIAL REPORTS IN THE PREss IN ENGLAND AND WALES

Western scholars have argued that image making and image management are a preoccupation of the judiciary. Images of the judiciary may take a variety of forms and be produced for kinds of audiences. One form of judicial image making and image management is live performances in the courtroom and other court settings. Another is the written judgment where the preoccupation is the style of the written text. Press and other mass media reports of judicial activity are another. The audience for judicial images is equally diverse, from fellow judges, lawyers in the courts and the wider legal community, the litigants before the courts to the executive, legislature and the public both in the courtroom and beyond. The image of the judiciary that is available to the public has a particular significance in Western rule of law democracies. As a general rule courts and the judiciary are required to operate in public and their activities must be open to public scrutiny. A recent policy manifestation of this goal is debated about confidence in the justice system and initiatives designed to improve confidence. In the majority of cases public scrutiny of judicial activity and public confidence in the judiciary relies upon the media. Objective and accurate press and media reports play a key role in shaping public understanding of the judiciary and generating or undermining confidence in that institution. Reports in regional and national newspapers have long been an important source of information, shaping public knowledge and facilitating public scrutiny of the justice system. In the UK, there is almost no scholarship on these representations past or present. The result is little known about the representation of the courts and the judiciary in press reports. Little is known about what the diligent reader of these reports can learn about judicial activity. The aim of this article is to take a first step towards changing that state of affairs. It uses a data set made up of 205 contemporary domestic newspaper reports of court and judi