排序方式: 共有10条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
2.
Eva-Clarita Pettai 《Journal of Baltic studies》2016,47(2):165-178
This is a debate article about a volume by Michael Bernhard and Jan Kubik, who put forth a novel analytical framework for comparing memory regimes in post-communist Central and Eastern Europe. The article briefly outlines the model, debates the results of the Baltic chapter in the volume, offers a more rigorous comparative application of the original framework to these cases, and finally provides a methodological critique with regard to the comparative study of memory politics more broadly. 相似文献
3.
Kreuzer Marcus Pettai Vello 《Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID)》2003,38(2):76-98
In contrast to established party systems, the transformation of post-communist party systems is not only shaped by shifts
in electoral preferences, but also by the changing organizational loyalties of politicians. Post-communist politicians pursue
a wide range of organizational strategies such as party fusions, fissions, start-ups, and interparty switching. By focusing
on the interaction between these organizational strategies and voters’ electoral preferences, we argue that the seeming instability
of post-communist party systems actually reveals distinct patterns of political change. The article develops an analytical
framework, which incorporates politician-driven interparty mobility and voter-induced electoral change. It uses this framework
to show that the apparently inchoate party systems of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania actually follow definable modes of transformation.
Marcus Kreuzer is assistant professor of political science at Villanova University. His work focuses on how electoral and
legislative institutions shape the organizational and electioneering practices of parties in interwar Europe and post-communist
democracies. He also is studying the origins of liberal democracy in nineteenth century Europe. He is author ofInstitutions and Innovation—Voters, Politicians and Interest Groups in the Consolidation of Democracy: France and Germany,
1870–1939 (2001).
Vello Pettai is lecturer in political science at the University of Tartu, Estonia. He specializes in comparative ethnopolitics
and party politics. He has published previously inNations and Nationalism, Post-Soviet Affairs, East European Politics and Society, andJournal of Democracy.
We would like to thank for Artis Pabriks and Darius Zeruolis for sharing their knowledge of Latvian and Lithuanian party politics
as well as John T. Ishiyama, Scott Desposato, and two anonymous SCID reviewers for commenting on an earlier draft. Funding
for this research came from an Estonian Science Foundation grant, nr. 4904. We gratefully acknowledge their support. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Eva-Clarita Pettai 《欧亚研究》2015,67(7):1079-1101
This article discusses the presidential historical commissions of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania that were established in 1998 to research the crimes of the Nazi and Soviet totalitarian regimes and to overcome interpretive disputes that had begun to overshadow the new democracies' politics. Conceptually framed as a state tool of historical conflict resolution and reconciliation, the Baltic commissions' structure, operative work and results all reveal many of the pitfalls, but also the opportunities of such official bodies of historical truth-seeking. The article concludes that even though all three commissions had a clear reconciliatory aim, their operative processes and final output differed remarkably. Their contribution to actual reconciliation was also very limited. 相似文献
1