A prospective analysis of the relationship between childhood sexual victimization and perpetration of dating violence and sexual assault in adulthood

The majority of studies evaluating the relationship between childhood sexual assault and subsequent sexual assault perpetration by men have been conducted retrospectively and with incarcerated populations. The present study seeks to improve on previous research by prospectively investigating the relationship between childhood sexual assault and subsequent perpetration of dating violence in adulthood in men. Although there is a significant relationship between childhood sexual abuse and history of sexual assault perpetration at baseline, prospective analyses indicate that childhood sexual assault is not predictive of perpetration during the follow-up period. The role of family factors, including parental conflict resolution, is implicated in subsequent sexual aggression. These results are supportive of the idea that the effects of childhood sexual abuse may be mediated by a variety of factors.     

Universal Jurisdiction of Spanish Courts over Genocide in Tibet: Can it Work?

The Audiencia Nacional has authorized investigations into actsof genocide committed in Tibet, based on complaints againstthe former President and the former Prime Minister of China.The decision is based on and implements the latest interpretationof the notion of universal jurisdiction by the Spanish ConstitutionalCourt, which does not require any direct link between the crimes,or their alleged authors or victims with Spain. Given the banin Spain on trials in absentia, the institution of criminalproceedings in this case will not lead to any conviction. Moreover,with this decision, the political viability of universal jurisdictionis, once again, put to the test. Nevertheless, criminal prosecutionof alleged genocide in Tibet might reinforce the emerging statepractice accepting the exercise of universal jurisdiction overthe most heinous crimes.     

Separating Compensatory and Punitive Damage Award Decisions by Trial Bifurcation

In a simulated products liability trial, we tested the effects of bifurcating decisions regarding compensatory and punitive damage awards. Fifty-nine groups of 5-7 jurors heard evidence in a unitary or bifurcated format, deliberated about the case to a unanimous decision, and awarded damages. Trial bifurcation decreased variability in compensatory damage awards across juries hearing the same case, and also decreased the tendency for juries to award extremely high compensatory damages. In addition, deliberation led to lower compensatory awards in the low injury severity condition and higher awards in the high injury severity condition. Jurors reported that they were using evidence more appropriately when the decisions were bifurcated. Implications of evidence bifurcation in civil trials are discussed.